But, a subsonic 300BLK at 1100yds has about 120 joules of energy remaining, while a 7.62 x 51 supersonic has about 2600 joules (about 5 Mike Tyson punches). That's the difference between killing a bear and injuring a field mouse.
Can I make a recommendation? Remington 700 long action with .300 WinMag. .300 WinMag is cheaper to produce and has the same kind of destructive power as .338 LM and almost as good ballistic coefficient. .300 WinMag is a perfectly good round for stopping a tractor that is out of control on the farm and you're unable to pull the keys from the ignition. It's also powerful enough and long enough range to take down your self propelled cropdusting helicopter at altitudes up to 3000 feet, as long as your cropdusting helicopter does not have the optional rally fun pack with hail proof windows and panels. For those models you need .50 BMG with API rounds, or better.
Seriously, save the money by purchasing .300 win mag and you will not regret it. Purchase a tank style break and you will have literally zero recoil or muzzle rise. It's a great round to invest in, in case things ever go crazy on your farm.
I just read pages 15 to 27 of that Committee of 300 PDF... I've seen bits of that posted before, but I'm gonna read all of it now. Thanks for the post.
Also, I think we are going to war, but I believe WWIII will be a global civil war, where countries balkanize AMA kill each other. The famine that will ensue during the same period will likely help to bring the death toll into the billions.
This is a correlation does not imply causation scenario. The thing that makes these people willing to take the injections is the same thing that makes them willing to risk nuclear war for dubious reasons; namely, they are betas (e.g., easily submit to the reigning alpha, which, in this case, happens to be the bank / government).
This is honestly the most inspiring news I've seen in a long time. Italy was so ridiculous that I thought my wife and I would realistically never return there. I do suspect that the communist idiots within the country have ruined a great deal of the economy, and so a lot of the places we visited and restaurants we ate at are likely gone. One restaurant that we ate at in Polagnano A Mare is already gone. It makes me so sad. Not everybody in Europe is a stupid cuck, but, just like here in America, if enough people are retarded mongrels, then it doesn't matter whether or not the rest are.
Archive Link
This is interesting shit.
I've always wondered why they continue to do these obvious FF attacks when they are not even that effective at shaping the public opinion, and nothing big, in terms of new legislation, ever seems to really come from them. It's terrifying to contemplate what might actually be taking place behind the scenes.
Today I bought fresh, never frozen baby back ribs. We barbecued. The ribs stunk like poop. I bought four separately packaged racks from 2 different stores because they didn't have enough, all of them stunk. I don't know if this is related, but I've never had this happen before.
If you think it's crazy that they would do such a thing (lie to us to further their goals), look no further than the Iraq war, which was based on supposed evidence that the Saddam Hussein regime had weapons of mass destruction. However, it was later proven that the government had no such evidence and lied. Is it really that crazy to assume that these same actors would not lie to us about other things for other ends that they desire?
The Smith Mundt Act was repealed in 2012. This act previously prevented the US government from using false and/or misleading propaganda against its own population. Can you imagine a scenario where a decent government would want to repeal such an act? Is all of this really that hard to imagine being true?
I appreciate the reductionism from a philosophical standpoint.
That said, we (the physical human beings in the non-platonic sense) require energy, in the form of food, in order to survive. There is a natural economy in the non-platonic/territory sense, and an abstract economy in the platonic/map sense, and to a certain degree, we all choose to exist within the agreement of this framework.
That said, one supposition that my entire post makes is that we mostly all agree that there is a concept called "evil". This concept is similar to the concept of color, in the sense that each one of us intuitively knows what evil is on the map, even if each of us sees it differently in the territory.
Same for other concepts in the post. The goal is not to get everybody to agree on the framework for existence or to reduce our existence down to the elementary parts. The goal is to create a logos framework for better understanding of what is going on around us, using the elementary principles that we mostly already agree upon.
In other words, it serves little purpose, in the context of my post, to further reduce our physical "existence", simply as a means of debating the ontology of thought and reason itself.
For example, when I say "the powers that be are evil" is a supposition that might be useful, what I mean is that there is a group of people that desires an outcome for us (the proletariat) that does not represent what we desire, at least not through our informed consent. (for example, we might want peace and prosperity, and the death of 7 billion people is necessary for this outcome to be sustainable, but surely the death of 7 billion people is not desired by those 7 billion people - I am working with the supposition that the average user on this forum would agree with that statement, and would agree that's such a group of people who would make such a decision for those 7 billion people is "evil").
It's an interesting theory, but it's hard to rectify with some of the stuff these same powers do (e.g., take a known +100 IQ cohort and bring ~80 IQ mongrels into their towns, and then encourage them to mix). In order to get from there to the evolutionarily path you're describing, there is an inordinate effort required, compared to some more obvious vectors.
Archive link:
On the flipside, we might be in a correction during a melt up. I personally believe that the S&P 500 will reach near 10,000 before the real crash. The price of oil is definitely going to put a hamper on the economy, but assuming this price hike in oil disappears before ruining everything, this downturn will quickly turn into a flaming rally into the ludicrous realm when oil prices reach sub-$100 and the fed stops rate hiking again (which they will). It doesn't mean the economy will get better, in fact it will probably be much worse at that point, but the price of everything will continue to skyrocket, including houses and the stock market.