by pkvi
5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Imagin 200 million people being such bitches that they would actually allow themselves to be imprisoned like this. And they're mostly men, too.

Really highlights the cultural divide between them and the Wesr.

by pkvi
3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

An excellent example of the "basic dictatorship" in action.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, it was probably more the other way around; these stories warned that young children without guidance could be led astray and become lost, then Disney was like "We could build a place where people voluntarily bring their children to engage in hedonistic excess and then lure them away when the parents inevitably let their guard down".

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the smoking gun, is it not? Conclusive proof that the vax doesn't work and never did?

And just in time to really stick it to some folks trying to get elected in Ontario.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chances are, if the mother got the shot and got pregnant in the last two years, that kid's getting the shot too. No big loss.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can't magically regulate stuff to be healthy.

Formula isn't poison, it's just not as good as breast milk and never will be. The government can't magically fix that.

0
WeedleTLiar 0 points ago +1 / -1

Working mothers

This here's your problem.

Motherhood (heck, parenthood) is a full time job. Why do women think that they can, let alone should, work while raising kids?

Do you not have a husband to provide for you? That's basically the point of husbands; if your man can't pay for the families expenses he's a shitty man or you're a gold digger.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exceeept...

You don't substitute baby food for breast milk, you substitute cow milk. Babies can't eat solid foods for months, period.

Also, baby food is a massive scam. It is, literally, vegetables boiled mushy and pureed. You can make it yourself with a pot and a hot plate.

Babies aren't starving because of this. More likely it's a psyop to make new mothers (the most likely to succum to hysteria) afraid when they can't find "baby food".

Edit: Remember wet nurses?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I looked into electric cars back at school and it always amazes me that they aren't more repairable, considering how simple they are compared to gas cars.

No timing chain, no gaskets, few fluid systems, basically one big moving part plus accessories and a little computer.

Shoot, I should be able to change the motor out in a couple hours with some friends and furniture straps.

Seems unnecessarily complicated...

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine a country that exports petrolium, ships it across the Pacific to be processed into disposable consumer goods, which get shipped back to the original country and consoomed, then are shipped back across the Pacific for disposal, at which point they're thrown in the ocean.

Obviously, the best thing to do to deal with pointless waste in this, purely hypothetical, country is to tax the sale of farm trucks...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is more important than quality issues; the fact that they're gettibg fixed. People forget that these are largely still quasi-prototypes that are being fine tuned by a young company.

And yes, obviously you would recycle the batteries, the same way you do with every other battery. Throwing a battery in the dump is like pouring gasoline into a storm drain; if you do that, you're the asshole, not tesla.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

If someone even pretends to care about the environment, they should be focused on the oceans, full stop.

Nothing affects global climate, food supply, weather patterns, or ecology more than the oceans, which we are currently dregding for the last few fish and filling with plastic waste.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is just how political discourse happens in clown world.

Soon we'll see groups of intimidating young men in matching uniforms defending these judges by brutalizing protestors, and we'll have come full circle.

by pkvi
6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Doing a little bit of your own basic research makes all the difference.

I had a doctor tell me that the vax was safe. I asked him how he knew that because the safety trials weren't done yet (this was spring 2021). He tells me they are and I leave.

I go home and check and, sure enough, Pfizer says on their website for the vax that trials complete in 2023 (and I think they pushed it back to 2024 now).

If she were able to ask basic questions of her doctor, she could have easily determined they were lying and changed doctors; sometimes blind obedience isn't so great...

15
WeedleTLiar 15 points ago +15 / -0

He brings up a good point: if Covid were actually deadly, the people in charge (who demanded draconian measures for two years), let it spread to their countries completely unchecked and would have let millions die.

The only time travel restrictions or lockdowns made any sense was before the virus spread everywhere; they're somewhat useful for containment, but that's it.

Not only did our "leaders" attack our jobs, families, and rights in the name of fighting the "pandemic", they also completely failed to actually fight it.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

They'll get the bomb two weeks aftet California sinks into the sea due to global warming.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bailouts are, of course, only good for investment firms. Individual home owners can't wait for the money to trickle down and go bankrupt.

Bailouts are really good for anyone who can survive the crash because the government's broke and would have to print more money, causing more inflation, and diluting the relative amount required to pay back.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

The inflation will also water down debt, so these big companies can take out huge, low-interest loans to buy property and the relative amount they have to pay back will negligible. They're already seen it drop by around 8% and there's no reason for it to stop.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not "taken for weakness", it is weakness.

Gatekeeping is necessary for any functional community. If you let people in because they bitch at you, well, you get what you get.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not really.

In the 90s, no one cared about race, sex, whatever. Being a racist was also much less of a big deal and people didn't get cancelled for jokes.

In the mid-2010s the progressives realized that black and hispanic areas were shitholes compared to white areas and women didn't want to work like men.

So they decided that we needed racism back, otherwise they wouldn't have anything to bitch about; an unacceptable situation.

Look at the most racist event of the 90s: the Rodney King beating. Some asshole has a go at the cops and they put the boot to him; that's nothing (although it didn't stop the blacks from rioting cause nogs gonna nog).

Today our schools are actually segregating blacks and telling them that they will never succeed because wypepo.

I think we actually got to a post-racist society for a brief instant, but then (((someone))) started stirring the pot again. Racism is their battlecry; they want us to be fighting blacks and spics so we get ourselves dirty wrestling pigs and don't focus on the real threat.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

So our unvaxxed population is actually closer to 30% than to <20% like we've been told? No kidding.

8
WeedleTLiar 8 points ago +8 / -0

My message to her is the same as to everyone else espousing the "we have too many people" rhetoric:

Kill yourself, bitch

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›