Who was Cain's wife? There is zero mention of Adam and Eve having daughters.
Cain also says to God: "You have made me a fugitive. All who see me will try to kill me" ~Genesis 4:14
Who was going to kill him? Adam or Eve, the only two other humans at that point, whom he was being banished from?
Then he fled to the land of Nod. Who named it thus?
Eve later gives birth to Seth, who had a son named Enosh. "It was during his lifetime that men first began to call themselves the Lord's people" ~Genesis 4:26. But aren't all humans the Lord's people, created by Him? Who else was there?
I'll also point out that God made "a man" on the sixth day of creation and "[gave him] all the plants and all the fruit trees for your food" ~Genesis 1:29. Then God formed "a man's body" from the dust of the ground and breathed life into it, set him in the garden as gardener and forbade him to eat from the Tree of Knowledge. It doesn't say anywhere in the Bible that Adam was the first man.
It is entirely consistent with Genesis for God to have created "men" who were basically human shaped animals with no concept of Good and evil, and then created Adam and Eve whose descendants (the Isrealites) carried the original sin and eventually produced Jesus Christ.
What is human?
Is it simply any species of bipedal ape? Then yes Blacks, alongside gorillas and chimpanzees, are human.
Is it bipedal apes who have the ability to distinguish Good and evil and choose to act accordingly? Do humans have the ability to understand how they would feel if they didn't eat breakfast? To engage internal dialog and picture the apple? Then 99.9% of Blacks are not human.
You missed the point.
She's arguing that people dying is the worst thing ever (despite the fact that every one of those people will die regardless) while also arguing that killing can be justified in some circumstances.
By her own "logic", if she wants "natalists", or "stormfags", or whomever to die, she should be killed. I've told her just that for years now but she's still here, therefore she doesn't actually hold this position.
Everything she says is in bad faith, which is why I always second guess myself when I find we are making the same point. In cases where I can show to myself that what I think is correct, process of elimination dictates that she's only saying it to push her solutions on people who already agree with the point.
human rights
I decide who deserves them
Jewish philosophy, summed up.
That's not an argument, it's an appeal to emotion ("look how based I am for going against the narrative").
Lol, it's not like her ethnic group is practicing what they preach to us.
No choice? I can stop using the internet, period.
I've got an elderly neighbour who doesn't do internet and I help hin with paperwork and such. It's totally doable to never use the internet if you're willing to make yourself a big enough pain in the ass.
Edit: My friends and I used to code websites, in raw html, for fun back in the late 90s. The only "downside" is lack of reach but that's exactly what makes them hard to subvert. The technical details of setting up your own systems are trivial.
If socialism is functionally superior to capitism, Greenland will win the war.
What, this nigger paid to say things said something?
Don't think I'm seeing your point?
Good call, we should probably attack random Christians in response to this, right? Or was it Liberal women? Or natalists? Gosh, I keep forgetting who it is I'm supposed to hate...
But definitely not the Jews funding 98% of Congressmen, though, never them...
talking about
As always
VA already did it
You posted this before, no they haven't.
She's right, though. Abandoning White Supremacy means suicide for every White man woman and child. No race other than the White race woud ever "tolerate" another; if White civilization disappeared, the whole world would plunge into existential war overnight.
Yeah, other than any time you post something falsifiable...
Lol, fuckin classic Imp
"Every source is suspect except me"
Edit: This is totally unverified and probably just alt-White propaganda. But, completely unrelated, here's a couple of Jews who wrote a book bragging about it (literally the second search result for Kiryas Joel after the wikipedia entry):
If my taxes pay your rent, shouldn't I be part owner?
Yeah, Black people rape and murder with impunity and White people sperg out on the Internet.
Truely, we are more alike than different...
As a parent, I only use public schools to teach my kids, in no uncertain terms, why we don't rely on government for anything.
Ah, there's the other shoe...
He only paid $1,500 and spent 24 days in jail per child.
Except they're being charged with actual crimes...
Not really. Several meta-studies have shown that there is a strong correlation between rates of asthma and vaccination (regardless of type).
It's absolutely possible that babies are dying of asthma attacks before being diagnosed with it.
If it was "women's nature", there would be no babies anywhere and we'd have gone extinct.
Either something external causes the behaviour or prevents it; it cannot be natural.
Imp's pretty much got it. I'd add though, that there are assholes out there, right now, creating AIs with the directive of "do evil" and setting them loose. In these cases they will, and they'll be constantly trying different ways to do evil. Who knows where that will lead?
I think this stems from a (fairly recent) pathology in humans: the idea that you are evil and deserve to be destroyed and by extension humanity also deserves to be destroyed while, at the same time, being to chickenshit to just kill themselves like they should. This view lacks humility, gratitude, and compassion, and just so happens to coincide with the "death" of Christianity in the West.
The bigger problem is that we are abandoning the teachings of Christianity while trying to hold on to all the benefits Christian ideas built. "Free Speech" is based on the idea that we're all trying to align ourselves with the ultimate Good; allowing those who believe Truth is subjective to speak is foolhardy. Likewise with the very idea of "human" rights being applied to people who don't believe that humanity is sacred.
AI is a more or less inevitable stage of scientific progress which, again, stems from Christian ideas of ultimate objective Truth. However, it's being created without a thought to humility, compassion, or gratitude. It's a very powerful manifestation of subjective morality but which could not have been built without the ideas behind objective morality; it's an abomination in the first place and will inevitably be used for evil because the people using it have abandoned the idea of Good.
See, if you actually deal with ideas, instead of personal prejudice and generalities, we can actually have discussions.
Neat, huh?
"Natalists" are the only ones who pay taxes, anti-natalists live in their parent's basement until they're 50.
Aside from taxes, natalists produce the next generation of society. Taxes are completely irrelevant if this is the last generation of civilization, which is why anti-natalist opinions on anything don't matter; you're a dead end.