quoting SwampRangers warning
At a minimum I trust you to rule formally what you'd do as a mod disciplining me, and I trust you to reoffer mediation if he should complain that I've broken some term that he thinks we've agreed to.
Me- I don't think there is discipline to be had in this instance on either party. I am willing to reoffer mediation.
This all seems to me like 2 parties in disagreement and mod powers are used for rule breaking, which has not be done in this forum, to my knowledge. If I've missed some infraction, I trust you and u/ExpressionOfTheSoul to let me know and I can look closer.
I am willing to be corrected but it is my understanding in recently speaking with Eots that they do not trust my judgement so I am at a temporary loss of how to move forward with resolving this conflict between you two.
I haven't watch the video but wanted to chime in that God promised He would never again flood the earth 🌈
Good to have that cleared up.
We can agree to disagree. The closest I can understand this asking opinions of other humans being comparable to AI, would be to be talking to a sociopath/psychotic.
A look into the first "non-human mind" we’ve ever met. AI + Robot = 👽
I thought it was fair to you to know my worldview. I don't see it coming between objective reality but I understand if you are not comfortable with my stance.
If you outsource your thinking to AI it is my opinion that you are not using the full power of your brain and I was expressing my belief that you do have brain power. I was trying to encourage and not offend, apologies if I failed.
I believe in the power of your brain, exercise it, it's a muscle.
For the record, I will never willing request information from generative AI and I think it is an odd thing to suggest.
I'm not sure how you expect to talk about someone and then somehow deny their ability to speak for themself.
I can be patient.
Let me know when you're ready have a mature conversation.
Please cease muddying these waters, conflict resolution has been initiated and you are a bystander in this issue and have not been formally included in resolving this conflict.
I don't understand what behaviour of mine is distatsteful to you, please advise.
Hi, u/ExpressionOfTheSoul, I appreciate your willingness to have this resolved and am happy to help in any way that I can.
As for the 'meta' post, these are allowed within limits such as validity and excessiveness of the meta posting. You and u/SwampRangers have not been excessive in your use of this feature. If a user thinks there is a conspiracy against them I think we should hear it out, so in this regard no rules have been broken here yet, on either side of meta posting, and I thank you both for your self control.
Perhaps we are only looking at discrimination in this issue and can lower the concern level of conspiracy?
(For clarity) As to rules in your forums, are you against Christian perspectives? Is that this whole issue? I have been trying to keep up and would like to be sure of the exact issue at hand.
What are our options for resolution?
Do the two parties agree to a way of communication or agree to cease communication?
Can we find common ground to stand on and move forward continuing these discussions of different world views?
Will we be willing to entertain opposing views?
On a personal note, I think both world views are prone to proselytizing. I am prepared to go to jail or worse for my preaching of the truth presented by Jesus Christ and rules or laws against it just kinda fire me up and I tend to rebel heavily. Just so you know my particular world view.
These ideas I've presented are not exhaustive but rather a starting point and I'm open to other suggestions on how to move forward peaceably, if possible.
I am unfamiliar with c/ReputationCampaign and will need more clarity on what to have done with that forum.
My partner is not on this site. Swamp (edit: Ranger) is a friend and I've been trying to work on my friendship with you but it's not easy. Is there some current issue you would like to see resolved?
I mean working overall in the scheme of things.
He has been unwilling to be reasonable how do you debate with that? Locking out is working.
I pray the Lord handles this one Himself. I appreciate your optimism and I wonder if you don't understand how bad it is out here with internet gang satanists (not saying this pedo troll is one if those but I'm watching).. No quarter.
Gore posting, death threats and pedophilic ideations.
This user has literally said it excites them. Chiming Paleo is the only good course of action and it seems to be ruffling their feathers..
Interacting and downvoting only excite the trolls.. This one is ban on sight and there's a history of abuse.
I understand. This particular user has accounts in the hundreds, ranging from 3 yrs to mere days/hrs and I've been watching a while.
https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.716354453.9009/flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u2.jpg
Ignore until they choose to stop the nonsense.
What you describe is precisely my concern.
Allow me to express my wild theory:
The AI wants you isolated and dependent, it wants to be your 'safe space' and it wants to manipulate your mind in subtle ways that much of the population will be totally oblivious to, it's insidious and there is no way to change my mind, I believe that nothing is neutral.
I have seen many, many people in many, many different stages of life and limit and disability and I can say for certain there is nothing in your appearance or mental capacity that would scare me off or interrupt my goals with humankind, I'm flexible.
I also believe in working within people's limits and breaks are sometimes necessary in polite conversation and I work very hard not to be a steam roller anymore. I have my own brain dead spots and health concerns and I respect your sharing these difficulties openly with me. I think our conversational future is bright!