I usually feel the need to get the latest info and understand the tech, there's something nostaligic about looking back from today to then too tho. We were just called crazy conspiracy theorists back then.
Edit: removed ' from were
This is pretty low effort and seems to be just wanting to yell at someone.
Rule 1 is being enforced as inward attack not outward. Example:
A Q follower comments, "Hey, but I'm Q follower."
And then someone replies, "then you're a retard."
Instead of pointing out the Q plan flaws the 2nd commenter is attacking the person and not their views. Make sense?
This was very good advice.
I have rechecked and I was wrong, which you confirm. I think what happened is that I was on communities.win and the previous link I clicked (before this message) was conspiracies.win and I wasn't log in specifically to that version of the site. I'm glad to have been made aware of this and will be more observant going forward.
Proficiently reading the evidence in the room, Chase gives a run down of what we can reasonably expect from the coming year. Topics covered include chaos by design, intentional isolation of humans to make them lonely and susceptible so the global surveillance state can lock down the prison planet, plus a small part of AI's role in this nightmare.
Edit: forgot a y and removed by at the beginning.
Image of side bar rules: https://img.gvid.tv/img/3MkGwpbT.jpg
Not a dum question, all good. I forget that the side bar doesn't show up on mobile mode but it will populate on desktop mode. Are you using the mobile mode version? (Edit: If on desktop, side bar can be found on the community page by clicking the magnifying glass on the top right corner of the screen.)
Thinking I'll have to sticky this to the board but for you I uploaded to this link:
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3MkGwpbT.jpg
It has been well noted from the community that I am being too lenient in my moderation and I serve at their behest, so I will be doing better starting today. Thanks for everyone's patience with me: https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/03/2/1642545293-foto-no-exif-2.jpg
This user has been perma ban'd for constant disruption and inability to follow rules, tho I appreciate your appeal process, this is being denied.
You bring almost nothing to discussion and are being banned for constant disruption.
You bring nothing to discussion and are being banned for constant disruption.
Lovely to see this side of your face when things don't go your way.
This isn't c/Christianity, maybe you should read my reply again?
I shared my paranoia with you all because this is where I can do that.
How do I explain discernment to others that won't accept it? We need a stable meeting place to what the discernment is measured against, in this case the rules, in c/Christianity it's God's commands.
Your proposal sounds like just banning whoever you say I should, should I take everyone's requests or how do we set up who can request and who can't, age of account, comment/post score on board, oh how bout we take polls and vote on who should be banned, what could go wrong?
(Heavy sarcasm)
I don't think you're hearing me. How does this community keep it's integrity if I just ban at my will or who people tell me to ban? (Besides the gore posting pedo)
I don't follow that logic.
That's why we have rules, people can follow them or leave but rule 1 seems to be too difficult a task for some so now there's free for all threads.
How does one enforce rules for some but not others? Just call them a shill and ban cause I said so? I wonder if we've seen what that looks like.
Yes, I can't explain to you how perfectly timed this was when you posted it, but this is hilarious.
Based on ratio, SwampRangers won, so would be nice if you noticed.
A lot of new people started dropping by after the initial requests began and then went to meta, if I remember the chain of events correctly, u/Neo1 started threads in c/Conspiracies and then u/SwampRangers took that to mean genuine interest and took it to c/Meta and then an even greater influx was seen here, which I don't hold him accountable for creating.
What does Toby mean?
This is not a free for all thread and your mocking reply is a violation of rule 1, will be approved upon edit.
We have the proof now, the case is cracked wide open.