I've only watched the first 20 ish mins but the video actually talks about antisemites being actual semites encouraging sympathy for themself, I've heard of this before and find it interesting.
I don't think OP is a shill, for what that's worth.
What I do know is that whenever you accuse Scored anti-Semites of being shill Semites they never ever deny it. It's always a winning trump. I tell them all you're making the Jews look good and they never ever stop to say, y'know, you're right, since I want the Jews to look bad I should stop acting like an insane anti-Semite and argue rationally. They always double down and act stupider. I'm literally the only one here saying if you want to criticize the Jews do it right, I said that on ConPro five years ago and eventually got banned for it, and never a soul has taken my lead and said, yeah, let's prove how stupid the Talmud is on its own terms instead of our own; every one has continued the strawman. Ooh, I haven't tried this with my most recent Talmud misquoter yet, I should.
A couple people receive my criticism and thank me for the context. But if they don't receive it I whip out my trump card and it's worked every time for five years. This could lead to a new theory: Jews (demographically of course) are so insular that they often fail to read the room to find out what's good for them. It's been noted that as a group they are abysmal at outreach and enfolding with two exceptions, Chabad and Messianics. Maybe some of them actually reason that, since the strategy of larping as anti-Semites always works and is morally acceptable due to a perceived war, we should press harder on it when challenged and act more irrational. But they think it would dishonor the name they want to worship if they were to admit the truth, that either the individual or the group finds it advantageous to larp and divide a larger opponent. As soon as they would admit the truth they would find the doors wide open for them; and I've previously prophesied that this is exactly what Judah discovered when he laid down his life for Benjamin and found he received Joseph and his riches thrown in.
Aside, there are a couple folks that are apparently Muslims larping as Christians. You and u/Mark4-40 may have spotted this trend before I did. They talk very Christian with the exception of the "tell" that every now and then something positive slips in about Islam, Muhammad, Ishmael, or oddly Semitic nontrinitarian monotheism. These folks always fall to the equivalent form of the same trump card, pointing out that they're Muslim (which they can never deny even though true Christians can calmly deny it on first request) and then ridiculing them for trying to make Christians look bad when it actually makes Muslims look bad as soon as they're caught. Looks like not all Abrahamics handle the pursuit of truth the same way. Let's call this the Nehemiah card:
Then I sent unto him, saying, There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart. For they all made us afraid, saying, Their hands shall be weakened from the work, that it be not done. Now therefore, O God, strengthen my hands.
Of course I don't use this card with you or real anti-Semites here, Skil, because you have a pattern of getting your facts and sources mostly right. I picked on you once for facts and sources as to extinction, and again as to young earth, and you responded very rationally. The trump card is reserved for people who refuse to listen to reason; when that happens I find that their unreason is totally blown apart by my accusing them of being Jews larping against themselves. Read again: there are "insane anti-Semites" and sane ones.
Irrational "anti-Semite" accounts always in my experience refuse to deal with the fact that they harm anti-Semitism. Irrational "monotheist" accounts always in my experience refuse to confirm or deny being Muslim, because I believe it's impossible for a Muslim to deny being Muslim in good conscience. OTOH, once I realized that I was getting accused myself, I told people I'm going to stop denying being Jewish and instead (being all things to all men) agree to suffer alongside the Jews, as Jesus did. (And that card also always works, because people can't make hay out of my identification because it proves that they're acting on no evidence and that it wouldn't matter to them if I were Jewish or not.) So the refusal to deal with an identity question is 100% a tell of larping, while at the same time I discovered that if I lean into dealing with the identity question by identifying with the accused class that is the best evidence I can give for being sincere and transparent.
My post history proves you wrong.
In this comment you make a couple generic swipes against "Jews" but decline to cite specifics such as saying Brooklyn rabbis like Yechiel Brauner and Yoel Malik "rape children institutionally"; but it takes 30 seconds to construct such a sentence. You also decline to note my regular statement that I worship exactly one Jew because you dismiss Jesus from being King of the Jews, IIRC (nor the recognition that the Angel of the LORD calls himself a satan, which is necessary context to statements about it). So while you do occasionally call out individuals, your post history trends toward the generic that doesn't build the case.
Yeah, we do that literally every single day. Citations and sources. Direct quotes. You have nothing.
In my experience 85%-90% of Talmud references here are not on its own terms but are failures of interpretation. I've contextualized those. When people get it right I often say nothing. I don't recall you being outside this trend.
The things I always call out when I see them, you mean?
I don't know what you mean by that. I meant the person who is listed repeatedly in the most recent position here. Nothing to do with you or your style. If you were unwilling to listen to the reason of this statement, you might indicate a desire to trend toward that, though.
We don’t really see that anymore, though, do we? Not outside of meatspace. They’ll false flag their synagogues with swastikas that have Hebrew character serifs on them, but their digital space has been far more productive by shilling for themselves, not against.
And hell, how could they even do that anymore? All of their own websites automatically ban jew hatred by algorithm! They’d get shadowbanned by themselves.
Next time one pops up, ping me in a followup comment. I’m curious now.
I've only watched the first 20 ish mins but the video actually talks about antisemites being actual semites encouraging sympathy for themself, I've heard of this before and find it interesting.
I don't think OP is a shill, for what that's worth.
What I do know is that whenever you accuse Scored anti-Semites of being shill Semites they never ever deny it. It's always a winning trump. I tell them all you're making the Jews look good and they never ever stop to say, y'know, you're right, since I want the Jews to look bad I should stop acting like an insane anti-Semite and argue rationally. They always double down and act stupider. I'm literally the only one here saying if you want to criticize the Jews do it right, I said that on ConPro five years ago and eventually got banned for it, and never a soul has taken my lead and said, yeah, let's prove how stupid the Talmud is on its own terms instead of our own; every one has continued the strawman. Ooh, I haven't tried this with my most recent Talmud misquoter yet, I should.
A couple people receive my criticism and thank me for the context. But if they don't receive it I whip out my trump card and it's worked every time for five years. This could lead to a new theory: Jews (demographically of course) are so insular that they often fail to read the room to find out what's good for them. It's been noted that as a group they are abysmal at outreach and enfolding with two exceptions, Chabad and Messianics. Maybe some of them actually reason that, since the strategy of larping as anti-Semites always works and is morally acceptable due to a perceived war, we should press harder on it when challenged and act more irrational. But they think it would dishonor the name they want to worship if they were to admit the truth, that either the individual or the group finds it advantageous to larp and divide a larger opponent. As soon as they would admit the truth they would find the doors wide open for them; and I've previously prophesied that this is exactly what Judah discovered when he laid down his life for Benjamin and found he received Joseph and his riches thrown in.
Aside, there are a couple folks that are apparently Muslims larping as Christians. You and u/Mark4-40 may have spotted this trend before I did. They talk very Christian with the exception of the "tell" that every now and then something positive slips in about Islam, Muhammad, Ishmael, or oddly Semitic nontrinitarian monotheism. These folks always fall to the equivalent form of the same trump card, pointing out that they're Muslim (which they can never deny even though true Christians can calmly deny it on first request) and then ridiculing them for trying to make Christians look bad when it actually makes Muslims look bad as soon as they're caught. Looks like not all Abrahamics handle the pursuit of truth the same way. Let's call this the Nehemiah card:
Has this statement ever been made?
By… exposing them as genocidal lunatics who rape children institutionally?
Antisemitism is the rational argument, admitted satanist.
My post history proves you wrong.
Why would we listen to a self-admitted satanist who worships jews?
Yeah, we do that literally every single day. Citations and sources. Direct quotes. You have nothing.
The one you’ve invented out of thin air?
The things I always call out when I see them, you mean?
Have you ever actually said this to anyone, anywhere? You sure as shit don’t say it to the real antisemites here.
Of course I don't use this card with you or real anti-Semites here, Skil, because you have a pattern of getting your facts and sources mostly right. I picked on you once for facts and sources as to extinction, and again as to young earth, and you responded very rationally. The trump card is reserved for people who refuse to listen to reason; when that happens I find that their unreason is totally blown apart by my accusing them of being Jews larping against themselves. Read again: there are "insane anti-Semites" and sane ones.
Irrational "anti-Semite" accounts always in my experience refuse to deal with the fact that they harm anti-Semitism. Irrational "monotheist" accounts always in my experience refuse to confirm or deny being Muslim, because I believe it's impossible for a Muslim to deny being Muslim in good conscience. OTOH, once I realized that I was getting accused myself, I told people I'm going to stop denying being Jewish and instead (being all things to all men) agree to suffer alongside the Jews, as Jesus did. (And that card also always works, because people can't make hay out of my identification because it proves that they're acting on no evidence and that it wouldn't matter to them if I were Jewish or not.) So the refusal to deal with an identity question is 100% a tell of larping, while at the same time I discovered that if I lean into dealing with the identity question by identifying with the accused class that is the best evidence I can give for being sincere and transparent.
In this comment you make a couple generic swipes against "Jews" but decline to cite specifics such as saying Brooklyn rabbis like Yechiel Brauner and Yoel Malik "rape children institutionally"; but it takes 30 seconds to construct such a sentence. You also decline to note my regular statement that I worship exactly one Jew because you dismiss Jesus from being King of the Jews, IIRC (nor the recognition that the Angel of the LORD calls himself a satan, which is necessary context to statements about it). So while you do occasionally call out individuals, your post history trends toward the generic that doesn't build the case.
In my experience 85%-90% of Talmud references here are not on its own terms but are failures of interpretation. I've contextualized those. When people get it right I often say nothing. I don't recall you being outside this trend.
I don't know what you mean by that. I meant the person who is listed repeatedly in the most recent position here. Nothing to do with you or your style. If you were unwilling to listen to the reason of this statement, you might indicate a desire to trend toward that, though.
We don’t really see that anymore, though, do we? Not outside of meatspace. They’ll false flag their synagogues with swastikas that have Hebrew character serifs on them, but their digital space has been far more productive by shilling for themselves, not against.
And hell, how could they even do that anymore? All of their own websites automatically ban jew hatred by algorithm! They’d get shadowbanned by themselves.
Next time one pops up, ping me in a followup comment. I’m curious now.