holy shit
it's a bullshit numberpad camera... you know those little cameras on the ATM's or the canister vacuum things that you use when you bank from your car...
it's the 2001 version of that
it takes stills, which is why we only have 3 frames of the plane.
the only reason we have that is because on the entire giant ass property that comprises the pentagons grounds... there is only one gate that was positioned in such a way that it's numberpad camera was able to take stills
it's a fucking miracle we even have that... of someone would have been at the keypad entering a passcode at the time we wouldn't even have gotten that.
that camera was about as close as you're gonna get, it's a 1 in a million that ou even got that...
and now you're claiming a hotel down the block had a camera pointed at the pentagon for some non-existent reason.
show me pictures of this numberpad from the hotel, then show me the 2001 camera footage from that numberpad that could see jack shit at the pentagon.
i'll wait.
this is a retarded argument that just because you don't have any evidence that something improbable took place... that therefore that improbable thing did take place.
i mean seriously what in the fuck?
holy shit you're dumb
thats the camera on the numberpad i was talking about.
i said "the only reason we even got the crappy footage we did get was because of the numberpad camera that takes stills of people's faces as they enter their gate code from their cars."
and your response was "YeAh buT wHat ABoUt ThE gaTe CaMEra, CheCKMAte ShillZ"
i don't believe that claim for one second.
sorry i just don't see how they would be pointing a shitty 2001 security camera at the pentagon from a hotel... what reason? why would you even waste the security camera to point it not at the things you are securing?
that makes zero sense and i don't believe a word of whoever you just quoted.
i said show me someone claiming they have footage of the sky
your response is "people are asking where the footage is"
no shit...
now show me someone saying they had cameras pointed in such a way that would capture video of a plane flying in the sky.
just because nobody got the tapes back doesn't mean they had anything on them, it just means nobody gives a fuck enough to give them back because its fucking stupid.
what part of a gas stations security camera keeping an eye on the beer cooler is going to show you the plane that hit the pentagon?
none of those people had cameras pointed at the sky, thats total bullshit and you know it.
why in the fuck would they?
what fucking purpose would it have served?
catching blurry images of birds flying by faster than shitty 2001 cameras could resolve?
critical thinking is important.
holy shit...
guy...
whats the exact scenario you're envisioning here?
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.
thats ridiculous bullshit.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
because it's all part of the official investigation that is probably still sealed up thanks to patriot act bullshit.
look... this isn't that hard to figure out... you using the lack of evidence that doesn't exist to base a conspiracy on... the simple answer is there isn't jack shit on any of the cameras because they weren't pointed at the sky.
so why would they give a fuck? it's all sitting in a box in a warehouse, and a folder on a server because nobody cares because there isn't anything on them.
i haven't seen my aunt in decades... that doesn't mean the government is hiding her from me.
seriously though... 2001... and you expect them to have had dedicated cameras pointing towards the sky.
Come on man you know thats just silly.
Beyond that you're also assuming all those businesses that the FBI/cops sized footage from would have also had cameras pointed skyward...
There was nothing on the cameras as should be expected because there would have been ZERO reason to point cameras at the sky.
Quite frankly, if they would have said "hey lookie here we've got perfect security cam video of the plane flying into the pentagon"...
THAT is when you should have been suspicious...
...again because cameras don't work that way.
A very good question with a perfectly logical answer...
There wasn't jack shit on the footage.
Again... because cameras are mounted high and pointed down
Why would there be cameras pointing at the sky that would have been able to catch footage of the plane (or whatever you assume it was) flying into the pentagon.
Ok lets just use a different example...
Lets say someone gets carjacked... and the cops have no leads on the case so they go around and get all the closed circuit camera footage they can find that might have caught a glimpse of the carjacker.
After watching the footage of all the cameras, and finding nothing... they are supposed to do what? Host the footage from all the cameras with zero evidence on a website somewhere just to satisfy the suspicions of all the "aliens stole that car" theorists?
At the end of the day this was 20 years ago, there were no cameras that caught any footage worth a squirt of piss (because how cameras work), and therefore even after looking at all the "confiscated tapes", they found nothing.
You're focusing on "why would the cops take all the footage"... as if they were covering something up by taking it... they took it for the same exact reasons you're asking what happened to it... so they could view it looking for evidence.
Which didn't exist...
Because of how cameras work.
"pentagon footage"
exactly what are you expecting here?
like... are you expecting dozens of camera feeds all over the perimeter of the building capturing the object that hit the pentagon?
and because you don't have access to this footage you're assuming what?
missiles? drone? aliens?
What exactly are you saying happened if not a plane flew into the pentagon?
...
Feel free to answer, or don't, it doesn't matter much.
Either way lack of footage isn't evidence of something, it's exactly the opposite... it's nothing.
Look, i don't know how old you are or what happened to you... but just a refresher... this happened in 2001.
There wasn't cameras everywhere like there are today.
I'm certain there was plenty of cameras setup at the doors/entrances, there are probably cameras setup in the hallways too...
but exactly how many cameras did you expect them, in 2001, to dedicate to pointing up at the sky?
cameras are mounted high for good line of sight and to prevent tampering, this means they are therefore pointed down into the room...
nobody installed cameras on the floor pointed up, that would be 2 extra chromosomes retarded.
THE ONLY REASON we even have the bullshit footage we do have... is because there was a tiny little bullshit camera mounted on the numberpad of a security gate that took stills. that camera was designed to take your picture while you're in your car using the keypad... if someone had been at the gate at that time we wouldn't even have gotten that "footage" because a fucking car would have been blocking it.
again... what exactly were you expecting?
1080p w/ sound?
of the sky?
LOL... holy shit you suck at this... ok kid, take care.
And by "take care" I mean "die in a fire before you can reproduce".
Lol, seriously?
"tRumpTard"?
What are you 13?
Stop being a such an irredeemable faggot.
fuck you weak faggot.
if trump wouldn't have pushed it through with "warp speed" they would have claimed it was tested, then mandated everyone take it.
if you can't figure that out... then i can't help you.
if you're too retarded to understand he did this on purpose to stop them from doing much worse...
you're the joke.
he was the only one who turned epstein in you fucking retard
banned him from maralago
but i'm sure you know all the inside info
Trump pushed it through as an emergency, they pressured him not to so it could be mandated from jump...
they wanted to force this on everyone.
he made sure they couldn't.
if you think thats a bad thing then i can't help you.
wow, now he's a pedophile too...
LOL.
you trump derangement syndrome faggots sure do make me laugh.
oh i see... you're upset that trump pushed forward an emergency vaccine.
apparently you'd rather have waited for the election to be stolen, commie CCP puppets to be installed, the vaccine to be "tested" so it could then be forced on you by making it mandatory.
do you not get the part where because this is an emergency use only vaccine... you don't have to take it and they can't force you to?
they can try, with social pressure, but without trump pushing it forward you'd be MANDATED to take it.
does that make ANY sense at all to you or are you just gonna keep being a trump hating weirdo?
They've essentially redefined what constitutes as "earths atmosphere", and the people feeding people this space is fake or moon landing was fake or earth is flat nonsense are counting on you not knowing the distinction.
"The atmosphere" was traditionally defined as what we can see, fact is there are trace elements that are "caught" in earths environment which extends much further than "the thin blue barrier" that sits tight against the planet.
Historical accomplishments haven't changed, the facts haven't changed, the only thing that has changed is the understanding of what constitutes being considered part of a planetary system.
The people spearheading all of this shit are the same eugenicists who have been jerking themselves off for decades about "the great reset" and "sterilizing people to control global warming"
They don't give a fuck if you are obedient or not, they've lost control, there's way too many of us now and they want to cut those numbers down.
The fewer people there are the easier they are to control.
burn it down
The issue is customers purchase and install doorbell cameras with the sole intention of monitoring their own doorway. They don't expect the company they are doing business with to then sell their camera feeds to local police departments and who the fuck knows who else.
The issue of photography is one of ownership. If you buy a camera, and you use it to take pictures or video, your assumption is you own that image or footage and nobody else has the rights to it.
I can take pictures of you from public, even if you're standing in private... because you cannot trespass the eyes.
however this is different... this is a mega corp hijacking your eyes and stealing the rights to the footage.
these companies aren't saying "hey here's the deal... we'll trade you cloud storage if we get to snoop into your private camera feeds"
they front it as a camera they charge you for, and a "service" they also charge you for.
...so you're overpaying them for a camera, then overpaying them to snoop on your camera feed.
it's fucking retarded.
your only evidence that all businesses mount cameras pointed at the sky to record birds... is a gate keypad's security camera on that property that took 3 stills.
you really cracked the case, bravo columbo, bravo.