Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!
thats the camera on the numberpad i was talking about.
i said "the only reason we even got the crappy footage we did get was because of the numberpad camera that takes stills of people's faces as they enter their gate code from their cars."
and your response was "YeAh buT wHat ABoUt ThE gaTe CaMEra, CheCKMAte ShillZ"
Gee, I wonder what the other cameras can see. I wonder if one of them is similarly positioned. If I take your claim at face value, why would I assume there is not a "gate camera" to capture faces at a hotel? You are very rude and you can't prove a negative when there is already a positive counter example. Saying that the one and only example of footage that we have, that disproves your hypothesis, simply doesn't count because you already commented on it is childish and I think you are the dumb one. :)
it's a bullshit numberpad camera... you know those little cameras on the ATM's or the canister vacuum things that you use when you bank from your car...
it's the 2001 version of that
it takes stills, which is why we only have 3 frames of the plane.
the only reason we have that is because on the entire giant ass property that comprises the pentagons grounds... there is only one gate that was positioned in such a way that it's numberpad camera was able to take stills
it's a fucking miracle we even have that... of someone would have been at the keypad entering a passcode at the time we wouldn't even have gotten that.
that camera was about as close as you're gonna get, it's a 1 in a million that ou even got that...
and now you're claiming a hotel down the block had a camera pointed at the pentagon for some non-existent reason.
show me pictures of this numberpad from the hotel, then show me the 2001 camera footage from that numberpad that could see jack shit at the pentagon.
i'll wait.
this is a retarded argument that just because you don't have any evidence that something improbable took place... that therefore that improbable thing did take place.
2001
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pentagon_Security_Camera_2.ogv
Notice how the single piece of released footage includes a bunch of sky thereby proving your hypothesis that, in 2001, there were no security cameras positioned to see the sky completely false by its very existence as a single counter example is sufficient to disprove a negative claim.
Think critically. Also, you are rude and arrogant while being wrong, never a good look. Be better!
holy shit you're dumb
thats the camera on the numberpad i was talking about.
i said "the only reason we even got the crappy footage we did get was because of the numberpad camera that takes stills of people's faces as they enter their gate code from their cars."
and your response was "YeAh buT wHat ABoUt ThE gaTe CaMEra, CheCKMAte ShillZ"
Gee, I wonder what the other cameras can see. I wonder if one of them is similarly positioned. If I take your claim at face value, why would I assume there is not a "gate camera" to capture faces at a hotel? You are very rude and you can't prove a negative when there is already a positive counter example. Saying that the one and only example of footage that we have, that disproves your hypothesis, simply doesn't count because you already commented on it is childish and I think you are the dumb one. :)
holy shit
it's a bullshit numberpad camera... you know those little cameras on the ATM's or the canister vacuum things that you use when you bank from your car...
it's the 2001 version of that
it takes stills, which is why we only have 3 frames of the plane.
the only reason we have that is because on the entire giant ass property that comprises the pentagons grounds... there is only one gate that was positioned in such a way that it's numberpad camera was able to take stills
it's a fucking miracle we even have that... of someone would have been at the keypad entering a passcode at the time we wouldn't even have gotten that.
that camera was about as close as you're gonna get, it's a 1 in a million that ou even got that...
and now you're claiming a hotel down the block had a camera pointed at the pentagon for some non-existent reason.
show me pictures of this numberpad from the hotel, then show me the 2001 camera footage from that numberpad that could see jack shit at the pentagon.
i'll wait.
this is a retarded argument that just because you don't have any evidence that something improbable took place... that therefore that improbable thing did take place.
i mean seriously what in the fuck?