They didn’t need to be pointed at the sky to show a flying object penetrating the outer wall. They have had security cameras for decades guy. Banks had security cameras recording 24/7 since the 90s. The military would have the budget and tech to include cameras to protect their headquarters in 2001...
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.
They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
Judicial Watch has repeatedly asked for the footage back but they have never gotten it. Even the people who own the cameras have never seen the footage because the FBI was there within MINUTES to take their property never to return it. You are sadly misinformed and it colors every statement you make.
Within this article are statements and indeed court documents from people who had their cameras pointed at the sky and want to see (insert whatever the fuck you think it was), and the government won't give the video back. It used to be very easy to find this sort of information but it is being systematically removed from the internet and shills keep trying to pretend it was never there. But we remember.
i said show me someone claiming they have footage of the sky
your response is "people are asking where the footage is"
no shit...
now show me someone saying they had cameras pointed in such a way that would capture video of a plane flying in the sky.
just because nobody got the tapes back doesn't mean they had anything on them, it just means nobody gives a fuck enough to give them back because its fucking stupid.
what part of a gas stations security camera keeping an eye on the beer cooler is going to show you the plane that hit the pentagon?
none of those people had cameras pointed at the sky, thats total bullshit and you know it.
why in the fuck would they?
what fucking purpose would it have served?
catching blurry images of birds flying by faster than shitty 2001 cameras could resolve?
seriously though... 2001... and you expect them to have had dedicated cameras pointing towards the sky.
Come on man you know thats just silly.
Beyond that you're also assuming all those businesses that the FBI/cops sized footage from would have also had cameras pointed skyward...
There was nothing on the cameras as should be expected because there would have been ZERO reason to point cameras at the sky.
Quite frankly, if they would have said "hey lookie here we've got perfect security cam video of the plane flying into the pentagon"...
THAT is when you should have been suspicious...
...again because cameras don't work that way.
They didn’t need to be pointed at the sky to show a flying object penetrating the outer wall. They have had security cameras for decades guy. Banks had security cameras recording 24/7 since the 90s. The military would have the budget and tech to include cameras to protect their headquarters in 2001...
holy shit...
guy...
whats the exact scenario you're envisioning here?
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.
They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
thats ridiculous bullshit.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
Judicial Watch has repeatedly asked for the footage back but they have never gotten it. Even the people who own the cameras have never seen the footage because the FBI was there within MINUTES to take their property never to return it. You are sadly misinformed and it colors every statement you make.
http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=6082
Within this article are statements and indeed court documents from people who had their cameras pointed at the sky and want to see (insert whatever the fuck you think it was), and the government won't give the video back. It used to be very easy to find this sort of information but it is being systematically removed from the internet and shills keep trying to pretend it was never there. But we remember.
i said show me someone claiming they have footage of the sky
your response is "people are asking where the footage is"
no shit...
now show me someone saying they had cameras pointed in such a way that would capture video of a plane flying in the sky.
just because nobody got the tapes back doesn't mean they had anything on them, it just means nobody gives a fuck enough to give them back because its fucking stupid.
what part of a gas stations security camera keeping an eye on the beer cooler is going to show you the plane that hit the pentagon?
none of those people had cameras pointed at the sky, thats total bullshit and you know it.
why in the fuck would they?
what fucking purpose would it have served?
catching blurry images of birds flying by faster than shitty 2001 cameras could resolve?
critical thinking is important.
Shill any harder and you're gonna have a stroke dude.
Take your ignorance to reddit. We know you.
you don't "know me" larper faggot.
fuck reddit, and fuck you.
Pissed off huh you chynezze asshoe.
Go fuck your mother like everyone else in your town has.