2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you have no argument, then. Got it.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who cares. Voting hasn’t existed for over a century. It’s literally all a Hollywood movie. They all read from scripts. They don’t “let” anything happen because nothing is outside their control.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

market pressures

Translation: “We decided to buy all land because we wanted to and absolutely nothing led us to this decision other than our own desires.”

“The market” does not exist and has not for over a century.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

you’re a fed because you said not to do what feds tell you to do

Thanks for admitting that your post is meaningless and a honeypot to get people killed.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Imagine thinking our enemies give a single flying fuck about “rights.” Enjoy being killed for tax evasion.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not going to jail is optional, too. Staying alive is also optional.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d love to have citations for all those “initial” numbers since they total something far higher than any of the mid-war propaganda delusions that ossified into the holocaust narrative.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

867-5309

8
TallestSkil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just use the surname exclusively when speaking about it. If he complains, ask if he’ll change it once he gets married.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hell, my book’s section on hypernormalization was one of the first I wrote (nearly five years ago; kill me). We’re basically there already. Everyone, everywhere, just magically accepts food prices doubling in three years. No one gives a shit that gas was a quarter of the price just 20 years ago. Real salaries are… well. Please excuse the NigNog video, but it makes the point fairly concisely.

No one cares about anything. Government does whatever it wants. No repercussion. Social behaviors are completely different from just 50 years ago. Zero resistance. Forget “we’ve collapsed but are too afraid to admit it so we’ll just pretend we haven’t.” It’s literally “I don’t give a shit what civilization even is, so I have no mental frame of reference to judge a deviation or collapse therefrom in the first place.” This isn’t just hypernormalization. It’s hyperapathazation.

It’ll get to the point where whites will just be sitting in front of the television as niggers burst into our homes and not even look up as we’re shot one by one. Mark my fucking words.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mmm, there’s an idea.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why does the concept of hypernormalization mean anything about exceptionality of 2024?

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean the same things that Trump supports? Almost as though voting has never existed.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Go to hell, you fucking spambot.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

can it really be confirmed

I’m totally open to “relativity” being a farce and a new framework being put in place to describe observations over distance at speeds above 0.14c. I was careful in my wording to describe only what we’ve seen experimentally, not to subscribe to a specific interpretation like ‘relativity.’

Hell, we still don’t have a grand unified theory. If we can’t account for gravity in our calculations, why should we assume the calculations are universally correct?

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh. Really? The light cone is the 3D projection across distance and time wherein an object can be seen. Because nothing moves faster than light, anything outside the light cone can’t see the thing that made it. If something is not moving with relation to the observer, it will appear to be operating within the same reference frame as the observer because light from the object will arrive synchronously with light around the observer. That’s why the “clock” analogy is so often used. A second is an agreed-upon time that doesn’t change, but a clock’s motion with respect to the viewer changes the perceived length of a second (at a distance) due to the foreshortened or lengthened distance the light cone has to travel to reach the observer.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no way for one frame to "know" it is moving faster than the other to slow its clocks down.

Well, it’s motion with respect to the light cone. You can’t move faster than your own light cone, but you can move closer to it than otherwise. It’s the same as the Doppler effect and sonic booms, except for mass-energy itself. I can understand that, at least.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Curved spacetime” is the allegorical explanation to physically describe the nature of relativity. I intrinsically distrust classical relativity theory simply because it was presented by a confirmed plagiarist, but we’ve measured what appear to be its effects in several ways, so it can’t really be denied.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine believing that.

Also, obligatory comment on a holiday so that an admitted homosexual is thrown into an apoplectic rage.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›