▲ 7 ▼
TallestSkil 7 points ago +7 / -0

a jew said something

therefore it’s true

I found a flaw in your spam.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

strawman

You have conceded the argument.

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Defending Hezbollah not enough, you actually also defend also Alex Jones too, how about that.

Reported for libel. Didn’t happen.

$50 million payed per year for 20 years, and it is all payed down.

Or, how about this: pay nothing on a fake court ruling that is literally unconstitutional.

Instead he opted to not to pay anything of that which he owes.

Because he doesnt owe it.

And that is why everything he has will be taken from him.

No, it’s because he disagreed with jewish narratives.

But hey, you could always try ordering some brain pills before he go out of business.

And yet you still have no argument and cannot reply to anything I actually said. Scream for me, coward.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

He owes a billion. Do you not understand math?

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

you’re a jew because I can’t read your posts

you’re a jew because you posted truth that I can’t refute

you’re a jew because truth hurts my feelings

you’re a jew because I have no argument against what you said

you’re a jew because I have no refutation for what you said

you’re a jew because I don’t like what you said

you’re a jew because everything you said is against jews

you’re a jew because you want every jew on Earth exterminated

you’re a jew because you say things jews are forbidden from saying

you’re a jew because I am too weak and cowardly to accept reality

Thanks for proving me right every waking moment of your life.

Reported for spam.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I await the punchline. Will it be about cows jumping over it? Will it be about visiting strange new places without toilets? Should be good.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

u dum I say so I win

u no argument I argument I say so i win

no I no have citations

no I no have sources

no I no provide anything to prove you wrong

u rong I say so I win

strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman

Thanks for admitting that space is real and that the white man went to the moon. Nothing you say or do will ever change this.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ad homs and no counters

The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.

[buzzword buzzword buzzword strawman strawman buzzword buzzword]

Amazing. So you’re too afraid to prove your own claims?

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I asked why there was no manned mission to the moon since 1972

What happened in 1971, dumb fuck?

deboonked

Literally didn’t happen. Learn how to spell.

Really?

Fuck off, zero effort paid shill.

That's a rhetorical question

It’s not a question, you incomprehensibly retarded bot.

I'm pointing out the contradiction in believing we've lost the technology to go there

No one cares about your strawman. We’re ignoring it because you’re beneath contempt.

was turned down by congress

Didn’t happen. Go fuck yourself, you retarded sack of shit.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you for admitting that space is real and that the white man landed on the Moon. You have conceded the argument.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude, you're just reinforcing my point

You don’t have one.

technology has improved drastically in every aspect and everything is a hundred times cheaper and easier to make than back in the 60's and yet there's no mission to the moon.

There have been dozens. Fuck off, paid jewish shill.

Are you telling me Space X doesn't have the technology to go 400 000 km and back when they're preparing for a manned mission to Mars which is 192.87 million km away?

They do. You’re inventing bullshit out of thin air and thinking we can’t take five seconds to prove you wrong.

This is a valid argument

Go back to reddit if you actually believe this.

there's no good counter to it.

How about we make a pact that you toaster bath when Musk lands on the Moon, whereas I’ll do the same when he doesn’t, okay coward?

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

you’re a bot because I can’t defend my own beliefs

Thank you for admitting that space is real and that the white man landed on the Moon. You have conceded the argument.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

[no argument whatsoever]

  • Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
  • Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
  • Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
  • Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
  • Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
  • Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
  • Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
  • Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
  • Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”? Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
  • If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
  • If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
  • A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
  • Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
  • Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
  • The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
  • What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
  • How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
  • Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
  • Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
  • Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
  • If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
  • If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
  • Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
  • How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
  • Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?

YOU WON’T ANSWER, COWARD.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting how they always seem to arrest the family members of people involved in their false flags so that they can't speak out against the falsehood thereof, isn’t it.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

[no argument whatsoever]

Burn in hell, you fucking paid shill. We will never fall for your well poisoning hoaxes.

▲ 2 ▼
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn’t say [x]

OY VEY SO YOU SAID [X] THEN

Worst paid shill I’ve ever seen.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Traditional cameras dont work well in space

Right, at least outside the magnetosphere. We used to send film cameras up on massively heavy satellites. Spying purposes, you know. When the film was full, the vessels containing them would be conveyed to a return capsule that detached from the satellite (now worthless) and fell back to Earth to be retrieved and developed.

Transistors did a lot for spaceflight. Specifically: they destroyed human spaceflight.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›