So it's true "Adolf Hitler had Ernst Rohm executed after learning of his homosexuality." In fact it was about 15 years after. Hitler knew Rohm was gay when DAP members were holding meetings at gay bars in 1919. I have the names of the places here somewhere from The Pink Swastika.
Very helpful, James, I'll mull it over and get back to you.
When this came up before, I've said I believe in Samael just fine, but I'm not able to accord him more titles than he clearly deserves, namely Yahweh, Yaldabaoth, Demiurge, or Creator. But then I haven't had opportunity to read the whole Apocryphon through so maybe I should do that first.
Well, if it's not physically feasible then either it won't happen that way or it'll be a miracle (spectacle), and either way it'll be good. I won't be absent from the catechumens when the Revolution comes.
Interesting take! Pulling some good historical quotes, and some less inspired ones.
"The Jewish financed Hussite revolution led by Jan Hus, gained cooperation with the Jews in Bohemia due to their shared affinity with Judaism and undermining the authority of the Catholic Church." Ah, but Luther turned against the Jews, so if they infiltrated anything then we are free to exfiltrate it. For instance, even as a moderate Sola Scriptura guy I've also recovered the place of Christian Tradition that would be, in this theory, what the Jewish force is allegedly trying to get me to lose.
"By 1517, the Jews who controlled the spice trade began reinvesting their profits into the printing industry .... secret trafficking of unauthorized and heretical biblical translations." Sure, they likely also made Luther the first grassroots meme. More important, the Fugger bank caused the whole indulgence controversy in the first place with its loan to Albrecht.
"Kabbalistic manipulation ... in the following two ways. First, in the internal emphasis on salvation as an alchemical process of self-enlightenment through the transmutation of a new man. Second, as external actions to hasten eschatological events by replacing the old Christian order with a new messianic Jewish kingdom on earth." Hmm, the new creation is actually Pauline and alchemy is the counterfeit; and millennial eschatology seems to be the original majority view, after which being nice to the amillennials led to the present watery stance. So I'd agree Jewish kabbalism resonated with this but didn't create them.
"Studying Jewish texts and rabbinical traditions as part of an eschatological mission to convert Jews to Christianity." Yes, it has its validities and dangers, like all evangelism only more so.
"It’s safe to say Yates is correct in stating that this remolding of Christianity is nothing more than a new manifestation of the ancient judaizing heresy." No, because neither of these are clearly defined. Judaizing is forcing laws on others involuntarily. Christian evangelistic sifting of kabbalah was not done by force.
Catholics did force Protestants and Protestants replied in kind for awhile, but that's a different case. For conspiracy's sake, it's interesting to note that the first blood shed in the Reformation was the Knights' War led by Franz von Sickingen and Ulrich von Hutten, influenced by Johann Reuchlin (uncle of Melanchthon), who is painted by OP as the kabbalist. They seized upon action against Luther to try to overthrow Catholic polity, acting against archbishop and emperor, attacking Richard of Trier but getting attacked back, which killed Sickingen. The knights' objections were then reflected in the larger Peasants' War, which has unclear causes but was clearly the result of "community organization" starting in Stuhlingen. So the religious wars were started by landowners who weren't Protestant or Lutheran (though they were friendly with Luther) and then by organized peasants, both of which attacked the Catholic structure with the clear assistance of the printing press and coordinated philosophy but without direct reference to Luther other than using his case as a banner to wave. So in terms of a demonic network setting up a major attack on church unity, yeah the fingerprints are there; similarly, the Catholic structure failing to give Luther a fair hearing could also have been the result of calculated manipulation. So I will agree with bookmarking Johann Reuchlin (a student of David Kimchi) as possibly used as an anti-Church provocateur and foil of converso Johannes Pfefferkorn.
Luther is quoted on Sola Fide as "These are those adorable mysteries of Scripture and vera cabala, which even Moses in some places indistinctly indicated, which the prophets and apostles knew." To me this supports the idea that he sought the apostolic original and used "cabala" in the same sense as Paul used the word "received" (H6901, Greek in 1 Cor. 15). Tabletalk 805 refers positively to alchymy as herbal and metallurgic and symbolic of resurrection, which again indicates the same desire to sift the work of others. Father Seraphim Rose adds, Luther "consulted rabbis to construct his text, and that text was, therefore, skewed in favor of judaizing". The similarity between the Lutheran and Rosicrucian seals is also noted.
Funny: "The Calvinists justified their violent iconoclastic crusades of 1566 with Calvin’s doctrines and were never explicitly condemned by the reformer" (yeah, because he died in 1564). And: "Perhaps for Zwingli and Calvin, the clarity of Scriptures came not from a clear reading of Exodus 20:4, which does not detail what constitutes a graven image, but from the Babylonian Talmud" (wholly speculative). And: "Cotton Mather even went on to develop the teaching that Native Americans were of Jewish ancestry, an idea so influential it later became a core doctrine of Mormon theology" (guilt by association).
"Increase Mather .... interest in Jewish mysticism was particularly sparked by the Sabbatean movement led by Sabbatai Zevi in the 1660s." Sounds more rational than the prior paragraph, but is also inconsequential. Quaker George Keith writes favorablly on kabbalah to counteract Jacob Bohme's favor of kabbalah, sounds more like the sifting mechanism than the infiltration mechanism.
"H[ie]romonk Job Gumerov reminds us: 'This occult numerical and alphabetic magic has nothing to do with the meaning of Scripture. Biblical texts do not continue any code or cipher.'" Not true, Matthew used 14 as code for David, John used 666 as code, Jeremiah used atbash subsitution cipher twice for Babylon, acrostics and anagrams are pervasive, etc. The question is the right use of gematria as opposed to the rampant abuse.
"These esoteric symbols we carry with us on our currency to this day should serve as a reminder that the American ethos was not established upon anything that resembles apostolic Christianity, but a form of Christian Humanism synthesized with revolutionary Kabbalistic doctrines." I think they represent the warfare over America using ambiguous symbols that testify of multiple strands of domination claims over it.
Davening is sexual? Noted.
"The first Noahide law contains an explicit prohibition of idolatry punishable by death, which incriminates Christians for their worship of Christ." Not true, because Noahide courts over Gentiles are run by Gentiles, not Jews, so Gentiles get to decide if Christianity is idolatry or not. "On March 26, 1991 the U.S. Congress, under the presidency of George H.W. Bush, established the Seven Noachide Laws as Public Law 102-14 in honor of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch." Good, a test. Full text below, and it does not establish the Noahide Laws but proclaims an Education Day and mentions "these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws" (not as interpreted by Jews but by the earliest civilizations).
"One might argue that regardless of the Hebrew word not appearing in the Bible, the doctrine of Shekinah as a manifestation of God’s glory is biblically sound; yet the mere usage of this exclusively rabbinical term begs the question: How did it end up in Protestant theology?" "Shekinah" is from the common Biblical word "shakan" for dwelling, and the dwelling of God is a common Biblical theme without specifying that particular inflection of the word. Using a Hebrew inflection to describe a Hebrew thought is perfectly acceptable, that's where we get words like "Abba", which I don't believe is in the Hebrew Scriptures.
Conclusion: "This goes to show that throughout the centuries, Protestant theologians have maintained their own type of oral and written transmission of rabbinical thought, whether knowingly or unknowingly." Well, the issue is what is truth because it would be expected that the rabbis would retain a little truth that can be sifted as background for Christians. We can't blacklist a doctrine solely because rabbis have said it, since everything rabbis say is supposedly from our own Hebrew Scriptures, so there must be a reason for them saying it. Even if a rabbi speaks a blatant falsehood (as they do), the issue is not that it's rabbinical but that it's clearly false.
Therefore it's still disappointing. Yes, kabbalah influences Protestants and founding fathers as it did many of the Church's original fathers, who rely on gematric and rabbinical reasoning. What I'd have looked for with such a title would have been a distinction between truths that Christianity has in common with kabbalah and falsehoods of kabbalah not found in Christianity (or Orthodoxy if you prefer). Instead I got "kabbalah bad" without any recognition that the first Christian creed in 1 Cor. 15:3-4, when translated into the Hebrew thought that pervaded it, states that it is literally kabbalah (formally received).
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded; Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws; Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos; Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society; Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future; Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world; Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26,1991; Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as "Education Day, U.S.A.". The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. Approved March 20, 1991
I don't know that Dante had one! AI doesn't help. My first thoughts are that the number of orders of angels are nine or ten, suggesting the ninth circle might have an "arch-" form of itself.
More relevant to this forum, the Cecil Rhodes will sets up many circles of globalists according to Carroll Quigley, and what's important to recognize is that the circles are not concentric. Members of each circle are designed to think they are the innermost circle but they are only loosely confederated. That's why there are such constant inner rebellions and infighting. The devil (if he's the same one) only retains his ultimacy by having been on top of all deception from the beginning and constantly outthinking all the others to keep them from overcoming him.
Those are my thoughts, very interested in yours.
Wow, that's new. I'd suggest going to c/Memes and making a dozen one-line comments on whatever inspires you; lots of folks do that. Repeat every so often until your handshake icon disappears.
Yes, anyone who writes "u/SwampRangers" as a parseable part of a comment thereby pings me (adds to my incoming notifications), as well as anyone who replies to my contribs.
Question: Assuming you're saying that the Orthodox Church is the way to make America truly Christian, do you think the Church has the capacity to incorporate massive conversions given its 1-3 years of catechizing without facing the dilemma it (the Church) faced in the 4th century with parts of it being accused of loosening its conversion standards too laxly?
That is, it seems the solution requires more than just the Orthodox Church has to offer in the earthly sense. In the heavenly sense, clearly whatever God is doing invisibly is to the benefit of the Orthodox Church and will suffice, but it doesn't look to me like he will solely work through Orthodox auspices without some kind of big deal-signing with other nominal Christians. Thanks as always.
You told this mistaken Trump origin story once already. Parsons and Hubbard conducted rituals called the Babalon Working, from Dec 1945 to late Feb 1946 (or from Jan to Mar 1946; not in Jun), the last in the Mojave Desert seeking a "moonchild" by immaculate conception. Trump's birth 1946-06-14 was too early to be affected. Others have pointed to Marina Abramovic 1946-11-30 as the likeliest candidate.
I'm not favoring the idea that that kind of portal would remain open; it would seem to be a separate operation for each moonchild. Like a volcano, it usually seals up when it's released its contents; it's the narrow minority that continuously flow for years, and they eventually dry up. Getting multiple demons to cooperate together is very ticklish! I don't think Parsons's summoning power was as great as Nimrod's.
Parsons (whose birth name was Marvel) didn't die then, but declared the last ritual successful and continued collaborating with Hubbard, dying in 1952 in a mysterious explosion at home after experimenting on explosives for a film.
Sure, cabal groups are aligned, but it's unhelpful to credit Illuminati, Jacobins, or KKK with more scope than they actually asserted. Jacobins were named after James brother of Jesus, via the Dominican monastery St. Jacques. I had some good Weishaupt info sitting here somewhere but there's no direct link with Frank or the Rothschilds, you sound like you've been listening to Robert Sepehr who is easily discredited on most any point.
blackmail video of a murder of a 12 year old girl. Trump didn't respond so Chabad had the existence of this video broadcasted across the fake news network.
Extraordinary claim. Sounds like Frazzledrip projection.
Chabad really wants Trump to make speech of Jews illegal but the blowback would be so severe that they are just holding off.
I take it you mean hate speech against, otherwise it's incomprehensible.
Israel and US are desperate to install a China style totalitarian system
We actually beat China to that technology, in the 30s, we call it SS.
The people are the savior especially when we tap into the power of God
And Jesus's unfiltered words are the best instructions on our use of that power.
Heh, I try helpfulness; then I let others decide. Trying brevity instead: My last reply was in about an hour, and so is this one (hover for timestamps); this evening I'm browsing and doing other work. Don't read too much into anybody's habits. My last paragraph above is the TLDR.
I said, I'm very interested in folks that might be able to prove me wrong and/or improve my views. You've got some insights and I like interacting with them. Coming from the trad church but with lots of nontrad pieces, ultimately I believe we can all agree on truths if we are in core agreement at pursuing truth at all costs. Secondarily, I wanted to give you positive suggestions for Scored generally (the mod of c/TheNarrowWay is very close to your views). If you don't want to keep explicating your views, that's your privilege.
The cascade limit is about 24 or 28, but that's only for organization; if you ever get an error replying to someone that seems to be due to a long cascade, simply copy the reply to clipboard, go to the OP (e.g. click permalink or context), and paste it as a new reply to OP with the ping of the other's name (like u/SwampRangers) added. I haven't heard that DMs are prohibited to newcomers; if so then it should fade soon as you contribute even brief comments, but it might just be your trying to DM someone who blocks all (the admins are big on privacy and so they don't even publish all the interface quirks). If you want me to DM as test, let me know.
TLDR: Spacetime limits are yours to choose; many of us are regulars who talk to everyone (beware us!); in particular I'm interested in anyone who pursues truth at all costs; so I'm looking forward to your thoughts on the 3 points I closed with (click context to see).
I BIN tryna tell people, some cryptids are ETI.
Okay, trying to follow, and I appreciate very much your (relatively) cogent explanation, James! .... First, I'm hearing the Jewish God involves "this divine spark or spark of the Moshiach", the "wrong God", then that Jesus says "find your own divine spark and each one of us must discover it" as if that's different; but it sounds the same to me. It also sounds the same as the imago Dei taught in Christianity. In reading the rest I don't find my question resolved because I don't see a difference between what the Jews at large (all sects) believed about this image (tzelem) and what Jesus believed about it; the differences were elsewhere. Second:
We must do the same thing as Jesus did. He showed us the way, we must follow.
We were just discussing that Jesus shows the Way and is the Way. I do believe that everything Jesus did as a human is what humans are capable of doing (plus greater works, John 14:12). We are to be one with him without any confusion in which one of us is what another is. That unity is called marriage. That leads to the question, when he "merged his consciousness with the consciousness of the universe", and Jesus and the Consciousness were one, was that a doing or a being?
Now I continue looking into demiurge(s) and finding interesting details that have changed over time. Demiurge is the Greek version and means public servant or architect, but is the last of the dodecad which ultimately comes from the ogdoad. But the ogdoad comes from Egypt (which literally makes the demiurge descended from Kek), and the Egyptian form comes from a branch allied to an old Semitic form reflected in the ancient legend of Eve (Hawah) bearing a boy and girl consistently every year. So it seems to me that ultimately the gnostic demiurge comes from some worshipped ancestor, someone who templates over both Cain and Lamech but may be historically distinct from both.
However, that leaves us searching for the attributes of the true God instead. I don't accord the attribute of being the true Architect (as public servant) to any creature but only to the Original (the Architect of architects). I don't accord the attributes of self-existence and power of force (which were intended by the term "Yah Sabaoth") except to the Monad. And I don't accord the attribute of being the final say on how things will work out for good to some subluminary, because I think the Source does cause all things to work out for good to the righteous (Gen. 50:20).
Finally, you seem to imply you have an answer as to those who don't desire the burden of responsibility. I wouldn't call that "normal" but it's clear that there are shortcuts people take instead of growing in the liberty that comes from enslaving yourself to the Monad. Now the fact seems to me that the mistakes and suffering are the path of growth, but the question is about those who don't want to grow and would rather eat Matrix fake steak instead. There are several ways that answer could go and (without leading the witness) I agree that gnostics didn't get any solution reported on their behalf.
So my lines of inquiry would be (1) differences between those Jews who rejected Jesus and those (Jews) who accepted Jesus, (2) differences between what Jesus did and what Jesus was, (3) differences between attributes of Monad and attributes of Dodecad. I appreciate it. If you want to redirect things to a new post (not necessary but sometimes helps organize), that could be c/HolySeekersOfTheWay, or it could also be c/TheNarrowWay (although I'm not currently contributing there and would only comment on that forum from a distance, out of respect for the moderator and for other reasons). There's nothing wrong with continuing here off-topic from OP though, since it's unmoderated; if we hit the maximum comment depth we can just start a new cascade of comments (pinging the user with "u/" and username, which gives the same notification as replying directly does).
I looked into the historical Jesus and I don't want any other. If the historical Jesus were not God in the flesh, I'd be wrong, and I'd want to know I was wrong. I don't see anything directly wrong with your last paragraph, although it neglects the phase that happened before the baptism which I don't believe in neglecting. Anyway, so we're looking at a historical Jesus who merged his consciousness with the consciousness of the universe over a certain period of time; please go on.
Add: All told, in one sense Jesus never claimed to be God on his own. In another sense there's evidence Jesus made lots of divine claims typical for being one with (God the Father) the consciousness of the universe, and so people can twist the meaning of "claiming to be God" on both sides of the question. I'm pretty comfortable with the meaning I understand about the divine claims and I love to hear new takes on them.
Actually when Win95 came out I kept Win03.11 because (I was right) I figured it would be 03.11 in about 8 years. DOS 6.22 FTW.
I have good news for you! I'm part of a group that has published the winning plan that will defeat big tech. It's published because nothing can stop it (no, not the NCSWIC, the other one). Do you want to join the winning side? All we need is to work out what local wins you really want to achieve and then integrate them into the plan. Are you able to speak positively about what you want instead of negatively about what you don't want?
Well, it's not very useful to answer questions if you're going to reject self-identification and claim to define all the terms, is it? What do you think I do that's Zionist? I don't have to have the same views as Scott Lively, though I don't think he's that Zionist either. Are you just larping to get me to criticize Israel? Why would Israel be such an important issue to you? You know we have a lot of people here larping to make certain things (usually Israel) look good indirectly by making their opponents look really stupid, right?
I cited people because they say reasonable things; you rejected the people without commenting on the merits of the reasonable things. If I had said the same things without quoting the people you might have interacted with the reason, but instead I thought it important to quote my sources, and you showed an ad hominem debate style twice in a row.
I agree with you that Christian Zionists, defined as favoritists toward the Jews and Israel, have been an important driver in creating Israel, so I didn't comment on it. But you act as if I didn't answer the question of why I'm a supporter when I'm not a "supporter" of the state. It stands or falls on its actions like any other nation, and I said (happening to select an Arabic word, for which I don't follow your tangent at all) that it's actions are in a low point lately (you seem not to have noticed the definition when you quoted the etymology).
So if your plan is to double down with wifebeater fallacies, refusal to agree on definitions, and ad hominems, I'm not sure this board is the place for you. I asked you what you believe about Jesus and your answer amounts to "not that" but you cannot give a positive overview of what you're committed to. A lot of people here are committed to seek the truth at all costs, and some decline to make that commitment and they wind up trusting themselves while believing they trust nobody, or committing some other basic logic contradiction. But if your arguments are full of logical fallacies why would I seek evidence that your foundational position isn't a contradiction?
I don't count myself a Zionist. I'm sold out to the Jesus who revealed himself to me. The state of Israel can be praised or criticized like any nation when it does good or bad; it's in a nadir these last few years. But believing in sharing Jesus with everyone I believing in building bridges and have special concern with building bridges to and from the Jews. That is, we should all come to see Jesus as he truly is, and Jesus speaks of his people as his bride which culturally means sharing in all his human powers and titles (and all the divine potential that entails), including being the Anointeds of our generation.
Trusting nobody is a great start. I tried it but then realized I was trusting myself to do the distrusting right. I doubted everything but like Descartes realized I couldn't doubt that I was doing the doubting. Bob Dylan said you gotta serve somebody. So looking at all the things in the cosmos I could serve, I came to determine that the Jesus who revealed himself to me was the best one on all counts; and that I don't have to sweat anything anymore because I can't keep myself in his hand but he can keep me. And as Ann Coulter says of Christianity, if you can find a better offer, take it! HTH.
No, my flat-earth alt is c/SwampRangersAlt, try to keep up here.
Good link, there are definitely intentionally different perspectives, but the chart also overextends its case such as giving the impression that "male" and "female" are plural when they aren't.
So we can talk c/FlatEarth (mine) or c/flatearthresearch (another guy's). I love apocryphal writings and they are allowed at c/Christianity (the original Christian forum, where I became the most active mod), but some might prefer c/Faith (mine) or c/ChristianAnarchism (nobody's). A friend just started c/HolySeekersOfTheWay and is open to apocrypha too, that's new so you can propose direction there if you like. There are more.
So I trust you accept James, since he's in Josephus? Note that when James says be a Doer of the Word, Hebrew for doer is Oseh, and I think the best etymological theory is that Osey became Essene. John and Jesus were a lot more Essene than people realize, because there were not just the cave Essenes, but a much broader supporter Essene network that lived in the towns but paid for the cave work to be done. The reason the Essenes vanished is twofold, the cave people couldn't keep up after life changed for everyone in 70, and the town people all became Christians and many of them dutifully headed for the hills in 68 following Jesus's prophecy. So they are a huge strand of the primitive church that (like others, including the Gentile) contributed to what the church was by the time of Polycarp and Irenaeus.
Yeah, the atheist is the original cuckold, he ignores God who gave him a social covenant as God showers all his love on me.
Hey Vlad, this is a fun conspiracy but I'm not sure what dots can be connected.
I see that there is fog of war about it, namely "her coffin was actually filled with secret documents buried to escape scrutiny" and "she was buried on the golf course to get a tax writeoff", which are apparently secondary theories that distract people from the core and paint unhelpful side narratives.
I see that the primary force of the event was to delay Trump's deposition to Tish James, but I'm not confident that's a big deal in the scheme of things. Also there seems to be no continuing "legs" to the story because nothing else is obviously tied in later to keep people's interest.
So my first take is that Ivana may have actually died earlier for other reasons and a decision was made to postpone the announcement of the death until it could be used to upend a deposition schedule to Trump's advantage. That would explain the initial oddities, but it would only take it one layer back to what other reasons she would have blunt torso injuries in prior time. Perhaps spy work caught up with her? Trump would have superior intel and control but would not have sufficiency of either SS or personal security to protect against a murder if it happened after Biden's larp began (30+ years divorced). But it could be presumed that (as with the Paul Pelosi case) the first responders might have been embeds acting on a contingency instruction to secure the site and prevent leakage of the event. Nobody dies on their death date anymore, that's such an old-fashioned idea.
Welcome back, just a reminder that c/FlatEarth is interested in your work.
The "firmament" is made of matter, of course, what might be loosely called "waters" (hydrogen and oxygen), but it's been "stretched out" to an extreme degree. There are three heavens of different character, and it's probable there are also different dimensional statuses involved as Paul and John show. Were you looking for something more specific from that?
One thing that happens at Scored is autofilters remove links that they don't like. When this happens everyone else sees "Comment removed by spam filter, pending further review." instead of your comment. You can find a log URL that will show the first line of the removed comment ["the origin of man is deliberately being covered up from us They are covering a lot more than you think about the original man. There are [two creation stories of humans in the Bible.](https://4."]. All you need to do is repost it without the link (and possibly tell people less directly how to find the link).
c/Conspiracies has no active moderators; admin names are on the list and they are active but very rarely step in here. So it's a Wild West forum right now. Don't sweat it.
You might be interested to know that basically no readers of Genesis had any problem with creation being told from two perspectives until 19th-century German higher critics came in and started writing theories about how the Bible was contradictory and recent and how nobody needed to believe in God or live morally. Little bit of pandering to their own deviances there. Quite an interesting rabbit hole. Those of us in the 21st century who are still troubled by Biblical accounts are not reading them in their cultural setting. But, as I said, I'm still interested in what the real Truth is as the two accounts have much to say about Reality that is unappreciated by Christianity (notice the movement of gold, for instance) and there is much around the text for us to learn from.
Welcome to c/Conspiracies! Obviously the moon landing would be much cheaper if it was faked so all the money would have been funneled into ARPAnet with a small cushion for doing enough science to keep their filmmaking relevant.
Jesus is who he is. He knows better who he is than I do, so I nominally defer that subject to him. But sometimes he lets me blather my opinion about him. More objective figures are about only 2/3 of nominal Christians are in the dark about this. Which aspect of who he is are you here to share? A couple of details and I could direct you to the most interested parties. Thanks!
Jesus's death and resurrection are inseparable from his message. Neither his message nor his death and resurrection guarantee salvation unless they are believed, but you can't meaningfully believe his message without believing in his purposeful death and resurrection and vice versa. And we do have more than 5 percent practicing his message, and that's why the whole world is being saved right now.
Totally false, there is no relationship between Iesus and Zeus except for the -us ending common to all male names. Jupiter and Zeus were not confused with Jesus, they were different beings; sometimes one is put in tension with the other, but never as a synonym.
No, from its start it was always catholic ("kath holes" in Luke) and orthodox, but there were significant changes in the 4th century when it was legalized that made it different.
Mary's virginity has been taught since the gospels and echoed in 2nd-century patristics. By why would you need to deny such a claim so boldly unless who he is were an essential part of his message? And if who he is becomes part of it, then maybe how he died and rose is part of it.
Yeah, I have 35.5, from fall of 4 BC to spring of 33 AD. People took Luke's "about 30" and added 3 years of ministry to get 33 years old, which is math abuse because whenever Luke says about he means about (approximately).
Christ is a divine person. If by Jesus you mean a human person, they were one. Christ is also one with us. And in whatever way we are to be Christ (Anointed), Jesus has already been Christ even more utterly so. Jesus shares the title of Christ with us such that he is called head and we are called members (parts), but this doesn't divide Christ and so calling anyone "a part of Christ" is misleading.