1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have not given you a negative response, and even if you want to paint my response as negative, it has nothing to do with your opinion on vaccinations.

I was against using these particular jabs because they were leaky, meaning that people who got the shots could get COVID-19. What can happen (I was arguing one of the intended purposes) is that the disease can mutate under those conditions to be deadly to anyone who did not get the shots. CNN was promoting travel to countries with populations that had no access to the shots. The implication is mass deaths of populations that contribute little to the wealth of the superclass promoting the shots, i.e. genocidal population reduction.

So please stop trying to tell other people what I am doing or what my motives are.

0
SuicideTruthbomber 0 points ago +1 / -1

u/user20461 keeps lying about this. I have neither posted nor commented on The Donald. I do not think that people who do not support Donald Trump are shills.

My post history is completely open for anyone to verify that what is being spammed about me is not true. I post content related to conspiracies from various parts of the political spectrum.

-1
SuicideTruthbomber -1 points ago +1 / -2

Independent journalist Michael Shellenberger discusses how what is happening in Brazil with Elon Musk and X, formerly Twitter, is a cautionary tale for what could happen in the United States on ’The Bottom Line.’

2
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

The administration announced a series of actions Wednesday in response to alleged efforts by Russian actors to influence U.S. public opinion.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is highly recommended for people interested in conspiracies, possibly even a must watch.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Precisely. You have to trust the policies of VPN companies, which I don't.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see the reporting as an attempt to inform the public, not an attempt to trivialize the issue. I don't think any reasonable person would agree with you on that.

-1
SuicideTruthbomber -1 points ago +1 / -2

Then how are people to debunk them?

Besides, if you want to live in China or North Korea, be my guest.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for researching those!

The first claim is based on technology that I read about in a science news article many years ago, yet now seems to no longer exist online.

The idea is that a two-part shot can be made where the first shot makes it so that a second shot is deadly. People who did not get shot A will not experience death as a result of shot B.

So the claim was not that people will die in two years. It was speculation that, "...you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines and, in a few months, or a year or so later you’ll die of some, you know, peculiar explicable syndrome and they won’t be able to associate it with the top up vaccines."

The second claim is that people over 70 who get the shots will "probably...die withing about two to three years." I believe that a large number of people over 70 will die in about two to three years from natural causes.

Part two of the second claim affects the rest of us: that life expectancy will be reduced so that a person in their 30s would die within five or ten years - not two.

Why is it that the experts in the entire news media on the other side of the debate are allowed to be wrong about so much while the most extreme predictions from a very small number of people are intolerable and evidence that millions of people believe weird things?

Here is a prediction from her in 2021.

Anti-vaccination campaigner Dolores Cahill no longer employed by UCD https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/anti-vaccination-campaigner-dolores-cahill-no-longer-employed-by-ucd-1.4678280

Controversial academic said children who wore face masks would have a lower IQ

Ironic, wouldn't you say?

2
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

In that segment, he said it's because he has nothing to lose for speaking his mind. You know they throw you under the bus for that stuff if you're part of the establishment.

I think it's just more lucrative for him.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of what you wrote appears unrelated to my comment. Those people were clearly not Saudi Arabian.

And not that it's relevant here, but what old school Saudis have been executed?

0
SuicideTruthbomber 0 points ago +1 / -1

To the readers: u/user20461 is lying about me. I call people out as shills who come here every day to tell us not to vote - which they are. I do not tell people who they should vote for.

0
SuicideTruthbomber 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you think that preventing propaganda is a legitimate reason to block people from communicating?

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Way to normalize this. I'm tiring of "big deal" being the answer.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

From Wyoming LLC Attorney:

Wyoming LLC Asset Protection https://wyomingllcattorney.com/Form-a-Wyoming-LLC/Asset-Protection

A properly formed company is recognized as a separate legal entity with its own Federal tax ID Number. Undergoing this process brings several asset protection benefits. Limited Liability Companies protect assets in two ways. The first is the protection of personal assets from business creditors. This is referred to as the corporate veil. The second is the protection of business assets from personal creditors.

Most states provide little or no protection in this regard, thus placing your business at risk. Wyoming LLCs do provide this second type which is called charging order protection.

1
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could not find the article by Brian Liar entitled "Reading may cause blood clots and heart failure."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›