After the fall death and suffering entered the world and Satan rules over the creation:
I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming, and he has nothing in Me.
- John 14:30
whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them. Corinthians 4:4
After Christ's resurrection and Him defeating Satan and death, we got the "thousand years" of Christ's reign, preaching the gospel all over the world and saving millions by bringing them into the Church. That will be followed by Satan breaking free, the coming of the Antichrist and the second coming and final judgment of Christ (Revelation 20).
By the way, scripture says that true physical Israel would protect the Word of God, form many Christian nations while taking the gospel to the world.
Christ's church is the eternal kingdom and the true Israel. The zionist idea of a worldly kingdom of Israel is antichristian.
Adam Green basic level word concept fallacy. Christianity is jewish insofar it is the new testament of the one true God (who created everything and is Trinity) and His turning away from the chosen people (the jewish tribes).
Christianity made it so everyone who is within Christ and follows His commandments is chosen by God, be it gentile or jew. Judaism is the rejection of Christ and jews (who are not Christian) embody the spirit of the antichrists.
What's your basis for saying something is evil though? Where do you get the standard for morality from?
That's not Biblical. The "true jews", the chosen people were often chastised by the OT prophets and punished by God for disobedience and degeneracy. That's why the prophets were sent by God - to straighten the people out (and surprise, they killed them). That was the pattern that Jesus followed too, since He was the final prophet.
That being said, modern jews are mostly khazars and are not jewish in origin at all. But the jews who killed Christ (and the prophets before Him) were very much jewish and the chosen people.
I'm not arguing with idiotic heathens who have no knowledge on the thing they're criticizing. Kindly fuck off.
I have. It describes the jewish plan for a NWO and the Bolshevik. Pretty much all the things in the Protocols came to pass in the communist regime of USSR. Henry Ford realized that and published the text in his newspaper, popularizing it in the West.
It also describes the coming of the Antichrist who will be jewish and will rule the world out of Israel (after the reconstruction of the Temple). I don't see any parallels with Trump though.
Because jews are not just communists. They are also the biggest capitalists and bankers. At their core they are antichristian and that's why communism is the most atheistic ideology ever to exist and why it fights against all Christian values. I mean look at their agents in the media like Ben Shapiro - he's a right wing "libertarian". They are technocrats and exploit every system which can grant them control and power. No ideology is beneath them but they won't tolerate Christianity or Islam (although they exploit mass immigration and cultural subversion through Islam).
Besides capitalism and communism is a fake and gay dialectic born out of the jewish funded and masterminded French revolution along with the ideas of secular liberalism and enlightenment philosophy. That's how the land of the brave and the home of the free was born too.
Adam Green basic level word concept fallacy. Christianity is jewish insofar it is the new testament of the one true God (who created everything and is Trinity) and His turning away from the chosen people (the jewish tribes).
Christianity made it so everyone who is within Christ and follows His commandments is chosen by God, be it gentile or jew. Judaism is the rejection of Christ and jews (who are not Christian) embody the spirit of the antichrists.
Most of us here were right about Elon. Just sayin.
They did that in Egypt before that. The Levon affair.
Dude, I quoted your comment. What is being misconstrued here? Just say you misspoke if that's the case. We all make mistakes. It's not my fault (half of) your comment made zero sense and I went after it. The second half I agree with.
Oh, so you never wrote:
“Biblical jews” are Christians and not relevant to who we call jews today.
The nerve you got to call me dishonest.
wow another great argument. Do you have other modes of communication beside using gay ass sarcastic quotes and not saying anything?
[BUT YOU’RE NOT TALKING ABOUT IT AND YOU’RE INSANE BECAUSE I SAY SO]
I never said anything like that. It's a strawman. Just admit the claim "(All) Biblical jews are Christians" is false and let's put that idiotic exchange to rest.
You're so bad faith it's not even worth it. So what is it - did they die because of the dysentery outbreak (which is bacterial) or because of rabbit starvation or because they lacked salt? If it was just dysentery and salt why is it in an article about rabbit starvation?
No, more than.
Not according to the source I provided. You just cherry picked the source you like better. Unless you measure the exact amount of fats in the shrimp you consume you can't know which one is closer.
Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.
As if one cannot cross check this. Here are a couple of papers, that took 1min of research:
So if you're following a 2,000-calorie-a-day diet, your target range for total fat is 44 to 78 grams a day. Of that, saturated fat should make up no more than 22 grams.
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/fat-grams-how-to-track-fat-in-your-diet/
%E refers to the percentage of energy, based on the total daily energy recommendations, coming from a specific macronutrient (fat, carbohydrate or protein). For a normal-weight woman/man, with respective daily energy recommendations of 2,000/2,500 kcal, a recommendation of 35%E coming from total fat is equivalent to an intake of approximately 78 g/97 g of fat.
https://www.eufic.org/en/whats-in-food/article/facts-on-fats-dietary-fats-and-health
So yeah, I lowballed it - you'd need much more than 10 times the fats you get now. It's hilarious you didn't even bother to research this. I don't care much for WHO or FDA recommendations too but what did you base your austere diet on and how do you determine if you get all the nutrients required off of it?
It's not even a biblical question, it's a logical one.
If all jews converted to Christianity at the time of Christ, there would be no jews left and we wouldn't have judaism. The truth is some of the "biblical jews" accepted Christ as the messiah but others didn't. This is explicitly stated in Scripture. The rejection of the coming messiah by the chosen people and the conversion of the gentiles to the God of Abraham was prophesized in the OT.
I know perfectly well what you're alluding to: the mentioning of the false jews in Revelation. The false jews are the ashkenazi/khazarian jews, not the priest class - pharisees and sadducees who were descendent from Abraham and were true jews but rejected the messiah.
Claiming I've never red the Bible is retarded, unless you make an actual argument along with it. This is not preschool. Also, I don't have to read through your other comment threads just because you already said something to some other guy. We're having a separate conversation here so if you have arguments address them here.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
What kind of inverted logic and strawmaning is that? One loses salts and electrolytes through diarrhea of course and lack of salt is dangerous. But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical. Diarrhea is not a symptom of a salt deficient diet.
Raw scallops: 0.5g/100g https://www.nutritionix.com/food/raw-scallops
Raw shrimp: 1g/100g https://www.nutritionix.com/food/raw-shrimp
So it's half, I was looking at cooked macros before. Still, with 70g of shrimp you get 0.7g of fats from it and together with the rice that's like 1g of fat per day. Even with the best quality and nutritional value you can't get much higher. Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
Soldiers dying of dysentery during a siege is normal, stupid. They had no salt.
I knew you would go there and that's why I added the second quote where the caution is particularly about consuming fat - not salt or carbs. Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Lack of salt can cause cramps, vomiting and nausea, not diarrhea.
I'm well aware. This method does not work with scallops, which have less than half the fat of shrimp.
Where do you get that info from? I've checked it and scallops contain about 0.6g fats in a 100g serving while shrimp is half that.
Icebound Inuits consume no starches, which is one viable extreme. The other extreme is my method, which consumes minimal fat. Both are viable.
No they are not interchangeable. You can cut off all carbs (keto) but you can't cut off almost all fats. There's a limit on how low on fat you can get before getting malnutrition. Why? Because carbs are only used for energy while fats are essential building blocks for your body. You are not a plant. If you can't research the science behind that claim on your own there's no saving you. Sadly, one of the symptoms of fat starvation is brain function deterioration so you've entered a vicious cycle. Here's what your article says:
In Appian's Roman History, Volume I, Book VI: The Wars in Spain, Chapter IX, page 223, the author notes a multitude of Roman soldiers dying of severe diarrhea after eating mostly rabbits while besieging the city Intercatia in approx 150 B.C. Appian wrote:
... strange terror in the Roman camp. Their soldiers were sick from watching and want of sleep, and because of the unaccustomed food which the country afforded. They had no wine, no salt, no vinegar, no oil, but lived on wheat and barley, and quantities of venison and rabbits' flesh boiled without salt, which caused dysentery, from which many died.
They ate wheat (carbs) and lean meat (protein) but no fats and that made them sick.
A World War II-era Arctic survival booklet issued by the Flight Control Command of the United States Army Air Forces included this emphatic warning: "Because of the importance of fats, under no conditions limit yourself to a meat diet of rabbit just because they happen to be plentiful in the region where you are forced down. A continued diet of rabbit will produce rabbit starvation -- diarrhea will begin in about a week and if the diet is continued DEATH MAY RESULT."
“Biblical jews” are Christians
Can't argue with that logic. You know you fucked up and don't want to engage.
That's it - I've been convinced.
Right about what? That all Biblical jews were Christians? Because that's what the argument was in the past few comments.
I'm not surprised, no attempt at argumentation at all. Just more snarky bs to conceal the embarrassment. You can't answer a simple question I asked you twice.
Lol, being called out on your retarded bs is strawman, how convenient.
Please explain how “Biblical jews”, even those who rejected and killed Christ, were Christian. Who did Paul wrote his final epistle to?
I bet. Spergs are not the best at arguments. "Christcuck" lol. Go suck Adam Green's unjustified pagan balls.