Soldiers dying of dysentery during a siege is normal, stupid. They had no salt.
I knew you would go there and that's why I added the second quote where the caution is particularly about consuming fat - not salt or carbs. Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Lack of salt can cause cramps, vomiting and nausea, not diarrhea.
I'm well aware. This method does not work with scallops, which have less than half the fat of shrimp.
Where do you get that info from? I've checked it and scallops contain about 0.6g fats in a 100g serving while shrimp is half that.
Yes, you added a quote about rabbit starvation to a scenario where it did not apply, stupidly.
Dysentery is normal during a siege with suboptimal nutrition and sanitation. It kills especially quickly without salt. I do not recommend trying ultra-low fat with terrestrial protein sources anyway, so the scenario is irrelevant. Saltwater shrimp fat can be safely consumed after light cooking, and is one of the most healthy complete fat sources available today.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea.
Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
While both foods are low-fat, shrimp contains over two times more fat. Shrimp provide less than 2g of fat per 100g serving. Shrimp also have a fat profile that is preferable to scallops, which contain predominantly polyunsaturated fats, such as omega-3 fatty acids.
– Shrimp vs. Scallop | FoodStruct
I will check agains the FDA: shrimp is 1.7% fat; scallops has .49%. So I understated the ratio; shrimp has 3.5x more (and better) fat than scallops.
My method of cooking loses no fat; grilled shrimp would not work. I avoid farm-raised shrimp, whose fat is much lower-quality. The worse the ingredients, the more food one needs.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
What kind of inverted logic and strawmaning is that? One loses salts and electrolytes through diarrhea of course and lack of salt is dangerous. But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical. Diarrhea is not a symptom of a salt deficient diet.
So it's half, I was looking at cooked macros before. Still, with 70g of shrimp you get 0.7g of fats from it and together with the rice that's like 1g of fat per day. Even with the best quality and nutritional value you can't get much higher. Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
The cause of dysentery is usually the bacteria from genus Shigella, in which case it is known as shigellosis, or the amoeba Entamoeba histolytica; then it is called amoebiasis.[1] Other causes may include certain chemicals, other bacteria, other protozoa, or parasitic worms.[2] It may spread between people.[4] Risk factors include contamination of food and water with feces due to poor sanitation.[5]
– Dysentery | Wikipedia
So it's half
No, more than.
Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.
You're so bad faith it's not even worth it. So what is it - did they die because of the dysentery outbreak (which is bacterial) or because of rabbit starvation or because they lacked salt? If it was just dysentery and salt why is it in an article about rabbit starvation?
No, more than.
Not according to the source I provided. You just cherry picked the source you like better. Unless you measure the exact amount of fats in the shrimp you consume you can't know which one is closer.
Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.
As if one cannot cross check this. Here are a couple of papers, that took 1min of research:
So if you're following a 2,000-calorie-a-day diet, your target range for total fat is 44 to 78 grams a day. Of that, saturated fat should make up no more than 22 grams.
%E refers to the percentage of energy, based on the total daily energy recommendations, coming from a specific macronutrient (fat, carbohydrate or protein). For a normal-weight woman/man, with respective daily energy recommendations of 2,000/2,500 kcal, a recommendation of 35%E coming from total fat is equivalent to an intake of approximately 78 g/97 g of fat.
So yeah, I lowballed it - you'd need much more than 10 times the fats you get now. It's hilarious you didn't even bother to research this. I don't care much for WHO or FDA recommendations too but what did you base your austere diet on and how do you determine if you get all the nutrients required off of it?
I knew you would go there and that's why I added the second quote where the caution is particularly about consuming fat - not salt or carbs. Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Lack of salt can cause cramps, vomiting and nausea, not diarrhea.
Where do you get that info from? I've checked it and scallops contain about 0.6g fats in a 100g serving while shrimp is half that.
Yes, you added a quote about rabbit starvation to a scenario where it did not apply, stupidly.
Dysentery is normal during a siege with suboptimal nutrition and sanitation. It kills especially quickly without salt. I do not recommend trying ultra-low fat with terrestrial protein sources anyway, so the scenario is irrelevant. Saltwater shrimp fat can be safely consumed after light cooking, and is one of the most healthy complete fat sources available today.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea.
Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
I will check agains the FDA: shrimp is 1.7% fat; scallops has .49%. So I understated the ratio; shrimp has 3.5x more (and better) fat than scallops.
Hm, there is considerable variance here though:
My method of cooking loses no fat; grilled shrimp would not work. I avoid farm-raised shrimp, whose fat is much lower-quality. The worse the ingredients, the more food one needs.
What kind of inverted logic and strawmaning is that? One loses salts and electrolytes through diarrhea of course and lack of salt is dangerous. But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical. Diarrhea is not a symptom of a salt deficient diet.
Raw scallops: 0.5g/100g https://www.nutritionix.com/food/raw-scallops
Raw shrimp: 1g/100g https://www.nutritionix.com/food/raw-shrimp
So it's half, I was looking at cooked macros before. Still, with 70g of shrimp you get 0.7g of fats from it and together with the rice that's like 1g of fat per day. Even with the best quality and nutritional value you can't get much higher. Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
you> But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical.
Sieges cause dysentery, moron.
No, more than.
Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.
You're so bad faith it's not even worth it. So what is it - did they die because of the dysentery outbreak (which is bacterial) or because of rabbit starvation or because they lacked salt? If it was just dysentery and salt why is it in an article about rabbit starvation?
Not according to the source I provided. You just cherry picked the source you like better. Unless you measure the exact amount of fats in the shrimp you consume you can't know which one is closer.
As if one cannot cross check this. Here are a couple of papers, that took 1min of research:
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/fat-grams-how-to-track-fat-in-your-diet/
https://www.eufic.org/en/whats-in-food/article/facts-on-fats-dietary-fats-and-health
So yeah, I lowballed it - you'd need much more than 10 times the fats you get now. It's hilarious you didn't even bother to research this. I don't care much for WHO or FDA recommendations too but what did you base your austere diet on and how do you determine if you get all the nutrients required off of it?