Where? The japanese guy has a brother. I've not seen anything about the rest.
It's curious but they are not the same guys. Michael Smith was the closest looking but look at their eyes:
https://www.tiktok.com/@bluemusashimaru/video/7290215543154445600
Sure. There are Ancient Greek texts expressing similar sentiments. It has only been weaponized in the 20th century though. Generations generally held the same beliefs, norms and traditions - there was simply not much cultural change and when there was it spread over a very long period. What you call clash of generations in ancient times is old people bitching about the young being young and stupid and vice versa. It was an age thing, not a cultural or existential one.
Today you have the conservative boomer grandma who still goes to the local Catholic Church and doesn't mind staying at the kitchen, her twice divorced gen x/millennial narcissistic girl-boss grand-daughter and her gender-queer furry lgbtqyz zoomer daughter getting groomed at her school's drag queen story hour. This is a complete mess unparalleled by any time in history. There's no social cohesion and no bridges between those generations. We're in unexplored territory and this is one huge demonic experiment.
Pop culture, as well as the clash of generations, is a pretty recent phenomenon. Just because something was in vogue when you or I were young doesn't mean one can't and shouldn't go beyond his immature teenage taste and ideas. I don't know how old you are, but I certainly don't hold the same dumbass worldview or listen to the same music as when I was 20.
True beauty is timeless. Bach's music, a Rembrandt painting or a monumental building will forever be beautiful to all generations, as long as they've not degenerated into morons and savages incapable of appreciating it.
Yep, same with the 60's counterculture bands and the pop star/idol culture. Fast forward to 2024 where over 70% of "swifties" say they'd vote for whoever Taytay tells them to. The top jews are great at two things - perverting and degrading society and making money through usury and deception. Pop music industry is two birds with one stone for them.
Why would good music be a generational thing? Is it because the concept of generations is completely made up social engineering for the purpose of uprooting people from their ancestors and tradition and instilling a materialist, identity-as-a-product, neophile worldview, that makes the young easier to steer and manipulate in the desired direction by the social controllers?
Medieval lute music bad but hillybilly fiddle music good?
It's by design. It's not so much about the money as it is for social engineering and mind control purposes. All degenerate art is used that way. Ever wondered why the jews rule over the music industry as well as the intellectual "art scene", both serving as outlets for meaningless and ugly art and all-around degeneracy? Jews know the goyim love a simple tune with subpar lyrics to it.
Was it an invisible link? Is it too hard to post a link and nothing else? I really want to look at that evidence you've got. Was the Millie Vanillie virus the evidence?
Your statements are hereby dismissed off-hand and you concede the argument.
"These are not the robots you're looking for, move along".
Said the “things that are proven to be real aren’t real because I say so no I don’t have to prove it” shill.
"Things have already been proven, chud, don't ask me for evidence or source - trust me, bro"
I don't see any links. Either put up or fuck off.
Literally gave you instructions on how to prove it to yourself, you incomprehensibly retarded shill.
I'm not buying a microscope, thanks. You have a) either done done the experiment yourself or b) have evidence of someone else doing it. If not, you just assume what the experiment will show based on your theory with no evidence. Why should I reinvent the wheel? Do you mean to tell me there's not a single paper online proving your point?
Show her the video of Building 7's controlled demolition. There was an expert on demolition and he described how the roof kink and the collapse was a textbook example of that.
Nope, it’s easily reproducible by anyone. There’s no assumption. It’s objective truth.
That's exactly where you're supposed to bring evidence of that. What, I'm supposed to take your word that's the case? If it's so easy to reproduce, the internet must be full of examples.
How a court case goes according to you:
- Your honor, my client is telling the objective truth, you have my word on that.
- Well then, it's all clear - case closed.
Spoiler alert - they don't. All the big decisions are taken way up there by the people who print funny money, i.e. the central banking cartel.
So what's causing the pathology?
Guffaw.
I never said you can't observe bacteria. Go back and read my comment. Such a bad deflection putting bacteria (germs) along with viruses. Talk about moving goalposts. What happened to the same experiment done with viruses? Where's the link?
Neat, so… viruses. Grown. From other viruses. Because they existed in the first place. And were grown in number.
No, it's more like what I wrote in my very first comment, which once more, you didn't bother to read. Viruses are observable ONLY AFTER the specimen is mixed in a toxic concoction of monkey cancer cells, antibiotics and enzymes, which annihilate the cells causing them to spill their contents, forming exosomes, which you and other lying dumbasses then wrongfully label virions blaming them for the pathology observed.
You're begging the question
Not what that means.
That's exactly what it means, smart guy. You're assuming the thing in question - i.e. the claim you can see viruses in saliva or in other unadulterated form under a microscope.
Genesis 3:21 refers to Adam and Eve being given their fallen corporal bodies (they were angel-like pre-fall). God doesn't sacrifice to Himself, that's ridiculous.
But I guess it doesn't matter in free Bible interpretation class. "It's just me and muh Bible, boy". I've always said the sola scriptura protestant approach is an atheist-making machine.
You'd be surprised to learn that every culture at the time (and much later) did animal sacrifices. Did you think the Ancient Greeks or Romans didn't sacrifice? The main crime Christians were convicted for in Rome was refusing to sacrifice to the pagan gods.
Singling out the OT is grasping at straws. If anything, God forbid idolatry and human sacrifices the Canaanites and other people brought to Baal/Moloch.
All you have to do is read comments before replying to them. It’s not hard for someone who isn’t paid to post lies. That you continue to have trouble with this is extremely telling.
If only you could explain yourself like a grown human being and not respond to my argument with "how many times you beat your wife". You were sperging and being bad faith from the get go. At least own your moronic 3rd grade behavior.
Reminder that viruses and bacteria are real and can be seen with home equipment.
Did you prove this? You're begging the question, you fucking idiot. The images you posted are of "virus cultures" not of unadulterated patient tissue or saliva under a microscope. Buying a microscope from Walmart won't help me reproduce them, unless I know how to prepare the culture, genius.
The reminder is you won't see a virus under a microscope in your spit under any circumstances. That is why nobody does that for virus detection. Then I asked If you have evidence for the opposite, to share it and prove you're correct. That's how an argument is resolved, not through whining and cussing (which is only appropriate AFTER you address the actual argument, you dumbass).
You're seriously sperging and there's no talking to you. It's evident from all your comment history.
Reported for libel.
Oy vey. Sue me, jew.
Why would I believe you? You're a bold faced liar. As if anyone would burry themselves in a 20+ message thread of ad homs and deflections - "I didn't say that", "you're strawmanning" and when I bring up the exact quote of you saying just that you go "so you admit it?" - you want me to believe someone red through all that circular idiocy and liked your trolling so much as to give you thumbsies? I don't buy it, seeth harder.
Yes. But Hitler fought degeneracy and the jewish banking elite, while Canada is completely cucked by them. The death camps were a smear campaign by the jews seeking revenge. Canada is more akin to the USSR commies (who were mostly jewish) and who terrorized the Russian people and where dozens of concentration camps were running up until the end of the regime.
How pathetic of you to upvote your comments from your burner account. As if anyone cares about that. And why do you care so much what a random guy on a forum thinks or says? Are you that starved for validation, little troll?
I've seen your recent comments - you're a sad little troll, ain't you? I hope you find peace.
You don't have to be a flerfer to disbelief the NASA space propaganda. How hard was it to place some beacon on the moon so that anyone with a telescope could see it?
Why speculate when they have written numerous books and whitepapers explaining exactly what will happen?