I never said you can't observe bacteria. Go back and read my comment. Such a bad deflection putting bacteria (germs) along with viruses. Talk about moving goalposts. What happened to the same experiment done with viruses? Where's the link?
Neat, so… viruses. Grown. From other viruses. Because they existed in the first place. And were grown in number.
No, it's more like what I wrote in my very first comment, which once more, you didn't bother to read. Viruses are observable ONLY AFTER the specimen is mixed in a toxic concoction of monkey cancer cells, antibiotics and enzymes, which annihilate the cells causing them to spill their contents, forming exosomes, which you and other lying dumbasses then wrongfully label virions blaming them for the pathology observed.
You're begging the question
Not what that means.
That's exactly what it means, smart guy. You're assuming the thing in question - i.e. the claim you can see viruses in saliva or in other unadulterated form under a microscope.
I never said you can't observe bacteria. Go back and read my comment. Such a bad deflection putting bacteria (germs) along with viruses. Talk about moving goalposts. What happened to the same experiment done with viruses? Where's the link?
No, it's more like what I wrote in my very first comment, which once more, you didn't bother to read. Viruses are observable ONLY AFTER the specimen is mixed in a toxic concoction of monkey cancer cells, antibiotics and enzymes, which annihilate the cells causing them to spill their contents, forming exosomes, which you and other lying dumbasses then wrongfully label virions blaming them for the pathology observed.
That's exactly what it means, smart guy. You're assuming the thing in question - i.e. the claim you can see viruses in saliva or in other unadulterated form under a microscope.
Nope, it’s easily reproducible by anyone. There’s no assumption. It’s objective truth.
Enjoy dying of AIDS, I guess.