People have been conditioned with this shit through pop culture (sci-fi, hollywood, games) and through the adoption of the regime sanctioned worldview of materialism and determinism aka soyence.
There's a reason why jews hate Christianity as much and went on to "secularize" the world. The Church has always taught that rabbinic judaism is satanic.
The transhumanist cult wants the sheeple to believe in this bs. AI isn't intelligence to begin with and it's not surpassing anything besides its current computational power. It won't pretend to be anything, because it doesn't have agency. It doesn't make decisions or create on its own. There are people behind this. Just replace "AI" with TPTB and this shill is spot on.
I totally believe this "whistleblower". What a brave shill to sacrifice 2mils just to warn us. Faith in humanity restored. Come on, at this point anyone this gullible is asking to be culled.
Thanks for sharing. I've listened to some of his videos and he's very good.
It's definitely in the cards.
I never knew the channel - is there some backup?
Is this Ones That Can SEE channel related to it? Was the original video made by Nations conspire?
Incidentally, I'm currently watching Lost and it seems to be inspired by this story.
Great. That's perfectly sharable.
Already replied in another post so I'll just copy it:
You obviously misinterpreted the title. If you had red the chat, you'd see I came to ChatGPT already having the figures from the official sources (Claims Conference and the US Holocaust Museum). I made it "admit" there is no way to reconcile the claim there are 220k registered living survivors given that only 170k children made it to the end of the war and that 96% of the registered survivors were under the age of 17 by 1945.
It's easy math that has nothing to do with ChatGPT's estimates and made up stuff. I just wanted to see how the model would try to defend the narrative (and it did try), that's all.
Knowing the Holocaust narrative is fake and gay is not the same as proving it using their own claims. Seriously, why are you so bad faith? You'd spend time and energy deboonking a strawman you made, instead of looking at what I actually posted. I refuse to believe you are that stupid so you seem like you're trolling at this point.
Sure, I know it works that way. Still, I came to it with the official numbers and gave them to it to see if it could reconcile them. It tried to defend the narrative and it failed.
You obviously misinterpreted the title. If you had red the chat, you'd see I came to ChatGPT already having the figures from the official sources (Claims Conference and the US Holocaust Museum). I made it "admit" there is no way to reconcile the claim there are 220k registered living survivors given that only 170k children made it to the end of the war and that 96% of the registered survivors were under the age of 17 by 1945.
It's easy math that has nothing to do with ChatGPT's estimates and made up stuff. I just wanted to see how the model would try to defend the narrative (and it did try), that's all.
Thanks for fact checking me but I'm not a liar, dude:
https://conspiracies.win/p/19BGK4R8mC/heres-what-a-true-chad-looks-lik/c/
My bad, you're not schizophrenic, you're a plain retard.
What part of "I used the figures supplied by Claims Conference and the NY Holocaust Museum to prove they ain't adding up" you didn't understand? Where in the title did you read I was prompting ChatGPT to give me an estimate or any other info? Read the fucking chat you lying sob.
All you exposed is that you can't read and that you're arrogant. Schizos lack self-awarness and are delusional which this post exemplifies.
Not only were you arrogant and dismissive of legitimate research for no reason at all (while complaining about this very behavior here), but your clueless argument was a strawman because my post wasn't about ChatGPT giving an estimation at all. I used the figures supplied by Claims Conference and the NY Holocaust Museum to prove they ain't adding up. The only reason I prompted ChatGPT is to see if it can counter this and to use it as a platform for the presentation. You could have given the chat a quick glance before commenting, but you had to embarrass yourself and have the audacity to still say you are in the right.
It's both. AI is efficient in many cases and it affects many bs jobs. I've seen it first hand. Why would you pay 10 people to go through a bunch of data when one guy with AI can do it?
Dude, either read what the post is about or pass. It's about Claims Conference specifically - it doesn't matter what other organizations count as "holocaust survivors". If you had red the chat, you'd see that ChatGPT made a similar argument which I refuted:
The definition is pretty strict actually. For compensation purposes, the Claims Conference defines survivors as Jews who lived in Nazi-occupied countries, ghettos, camps, or hiding for at least a specified period (e.g., 18 months in hiding or 6 months in a camp/ghetto). This excludes some refugees who fled early. Demographic Estimates: The ~200,000–220,000 survivors alive in 2025 (per the Claims Conference) are based on registered claimants and projections, but unregistered survivors (e.g., those who never sought compensation) may increase the total slightly.
So the 200k figure comes out of the Claims Conference and it only include jews who lived in Nazi-occupied countries. Nice try though.
What's the point in such irrelevant comments? You obviously know everything there is about AI and cooked holocaust figures, so don't waste your time.
Spengler called it 100 years ago.
Nice. I posted the book a few weeks ago. Another must read on the subject is Red Symphony: https://archive.org/details/red-symphony
HEY, WORLD!
THIS GUY JUST PROMPTED CHATGPT TO GIVE AN ESTIMATION, AND IT'S NOT WHAT OTHER DATA SHOWS!
See? Nobody cares.
The guy who commented this on my original post where I prove the impossibility of 220k Holocaust survivors being alive today using the official figures, has the chutzpah to complain about arrogance, poor argumentation and low IQ? Are you schizophrenic, dude?
You're, like others here, miss the forest for the tree. ChatGPT is not important here, it's just a way to showcase the contradiction in the figures given by the Holocaust narrative. It functions a bit like an NPC in a platonic dialogue of you will.
Are you stupid or just lazy? You could have at least read what this is about. The figures given by the Holocaust organizations don't match reality and I proved it in the chat.
In other words, you want the model to reason to the conclusion you want so you can feel better about yourself and try to persuade others, even though the model doesn't actually follow reason.
Did it occur to you the whole point of using ChatGPT for this exchange was to showcase the contradiction of the official figures itself? The chat with the model provides a suitable format for this. ChatGPT did exactly what it needed to - it pushed back reasonably and acknowledged the contradiction in the end. If you think it's just programmed to be agreeable, then come up with other objections to what I wrote and try refuting it. Logic is objective and if you think ChatGPT did a bad job pushing back and conceded where id didn't need to, then you should point out its mistakes and do better.
What? Being logical doesn't make you immune to arriving at contradictions. We are constantly presented with contradicting information and concepts. The thing is how you resolve it - a logical, rational person will acknowledge it and try to reconcile it. An irrational person will double down and commit logical fallacies to run away from it or brush it aside to alleviate the resulting cognitive dissonance and not thinking about it (Orwell called it doublethink).
Language isn't contingent on logic. You can say lots of illogical things with language.
That's a non-sequitur. How language is used is a different problem of what language is. Predication requires logic and this is philosophy of language 101. You can't form thoughts or sentences without appealing to the laws of logic.
I guess what you mean is it engages in faulty reasoning which is correct. People do too. But again what matters here is not to have the model reason for me, but to make it acknowledge a contradiction in the presented information, which it does.
It's a depiction of Lucifer or some masonic/illuminist allegory of the Talmudic revolutionary spirit. The problem is not that it's chained, but that the chain is broken.
Are people completely checked out? How can you misinterpret this so badly? It's not about stupid lolberts and "muh liberty", it's about the enlightened talmudic NWO that they sold to the goyim as liberation, democracy, equality and empowerment. The Statue of Liberty is the idol of your enslavement.
C.S. Lewis is boss. Him and Tolkien exposed much of the transhumanist conspiracy.