No retardstein, Catholics don't owe complete obedience to the Pope.
I love it when Catholics are not aware of their own religion. Here's Vatican I:
when the Roman Pontiff speaks ex cathedra, that is, when, in the exercise of his office as pastor and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed His Church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals;
We do only on religious matters where we believe he to be infallible.
No, according to Vatican I you have to submit to **all faith and moral ** doctrinal teachings with humility. Besides, how is the covenantal relation of jews to God, or of Muslims and Hindus worshipping the same God as Christians (ecumenism) not a religious teaching? Trad Cath cope is hilarious. I know your system and documents better than you do because I did my research before deciding what the true Church is.
It's also in the canons. Canon 720 states that anyone who doesn't submit to teachings taught by a solemn judgment (like papal definition) or by the ordinary and universal magisterium is a heretic. You're a heretic according to the definitions of your own Church, dude. According to Canon 752, even non-infalliable papal teachings require religious submission of intellect and will (Nostra Aetate is an infallible doctrinal teaching though - every single f-ing word in it).
Now cope and seethe more foreskinstein.
Nostra Aetate, which you're bound to if you call yourself a Catholic:
“True, the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ; still, what happened in His passion cannot be charged against all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against the Jews of today. Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures.”
“Furthermore, in her rejection of every persecution against any man, the Church, mindful of the patrimony she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel’s spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of antisemitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone.”
And 1985 Vatican document “Notes on the Correct Way to Present the Jews and Judaism in Preaching and Catechesis”
“The Church believes that Christ, who died and rose for all, can and must be the center of her preaching. However, she also recognizes that the mystery of Israel remains, according to St. Paul (cf. Rom 11:25–29), a mystery of divine election.”
“The Church, which rejects nothing of what is true and holy in other religions, regards with sincere respect that religious self-understanding of Judaism. In preaching and catechesis, therefore, the Church should take care not to present the Jews as rejected or accursed by God.”
And I publicly deny the Nostra Aetate as sacrilegious for absolving jews for the killing of our Lord like everyone used to do before the Vatican II.
Congratulations - you're a schismatic protestant. Catholics are in no position to criticize the infallible teachings of the ordinary and extraordinary magisterium. By rejecting Vatican II, you're contradicting Vatican I also which places you outside of the Church. Do I have to quote the document for you?
If you really were a Protestant you'd have no qualms with that which leads me to believe you're another evangelical scum or worse a shape shifter like SwampRangers.
Do you even read my replies? I've said multiple times I'm Eastern Orthodox. Do you even know what this is? You can look up my comment history and see me arguing with SwampRangers over his evangelical positions.
Ironically you edited this post too so I don't know what was your original intent. In cases such as this the burden of proof falls on you as you destroyed evidence thus indicating that you want to hide wrongdoings.
Dude, aren't you aware edits are visible here (by clicking on the eraser)?
There's no point in debating with yet another dishonest jew.
You shouldn't have any problems with it though because the Vatican condemns antisemitism and believes jews have covenantal relationship with God :clown:
What part I edited that changed the meaning? Care to quote it here? As if people can't check and see it themselves that you're lying, you dirty jesuit?
I know you won't provide it so here:
It has to do with the jews - original
It has to do with the guests (the jews) - edit
Btw, as per Nostra Aetate and Lumen Gentium your Church forbids proselytizing jews because it doesn't classify Judaism as a false religion and holds that they have a functioning covenant with God. Nostra Aetate was written by a gay jesuit jew. If you're Catholic you have to submit to that teaching. Trad caths SSPX types are schismatic protestants basically. Face it, your Church has defected and this is the proof it's not the true Church which will last until the end of times.
Lol, Peter is the rock but he's nothing like the RC Pope figure. The rest of the apostles were given the same authority as Peter two chapters later in Mathew.
You realize if papal supremacy was a thing in the first millennium, there would be no need for ecumenical councils because the Petrine See alone would determine what the right doctrines and dogma is. Not to mention Alexandria and Antioch are also Petrine Sees. So if Peter is what makes Rome special how come the rest aren't up there?
You think you're somehow better than or superior to most Catholics when in fact you're just like most of them as you don't believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
What? You have no clue what the Eastern Orthodox Church (which is identical to the Early Church) teaches. Have you red the Church Fathers? Why do you argue over things you don't have knowledge of?
You obviously don't know much about the Early Church history then because it had synodal structure and papal supremacy wasn't a thing. It surely wasn't a geopolitical entity with an army and a bank. You literally updated the Nicene creed that was dogmatized at the first and second ecumenical councils and you have the balls to call the Orthodox schismatics?
But I don't even have to go to debating history because it's the RCC after Vatican II is in obvious contradiction with prior papal teachings. This is a defeater for the entire system.
You mean the Church that supports and promotes socialism, skittles, globalism, stabbies, climate change and which has Popes praying in mosques towards Mecca and which claims Muslims worship the same God as Christians? That can't be right.
Everything works up to a point dude. If they eventually come to your house and shoot you in the back of the head, then what? "Ooh, look at that - bitcoin didn't save you from the bullet." BTC is not a silver bullet but it's the only shot at future sound money that's not gay ass fiat CBDC.
Do you even know what fiat is dumbass? BTC is not and will never be centrally controlled by a corporation or the government, nor can it be inflated via money printing you stupid nazi troll.
This Sunday happens to be the day that the The Parable of the Wedding Feast from Mathew 22 is read during divine liturgy. It has to do with the guests (the jews) refusing to go to the banquet that was prepared for them (by the OT prophets) and the groom (Christ) inviting people from the town and the streets (gentiles) instead to feast with Him.
Do you now understand why jews hate Christianity so much and how retarded people who claim Christianity to be a jewish psy op sound?
Sure, if it comes to the government unplugging your electricity and internet bitcoin won't be an option. I'll be moving to a country where that's not the case.
You're disagreeing with me rn. Are you a troll? No. So it isn't just about disagreeing, is it?
It's not just about his beliefs but about the mode and patterns of interaction. There are telltale signs.
He's doing it to elicit a reaction. Trolls do that, just ignore him.
Do whatever you believe is right. But don't come bitching in a few years about being financially enslaved to the beast system.
Keep quite, serf. Get ready to be ass swabbed by Big Brother to get your CBDC credits.
More like the China model where low social credit prevents you from using services and turns you into a pariah.
Hence Bitcoin. Unless you detach yourself from their fiat financial system you'd be forced to accept their digital biometric ID.
Yes, I agree. The internet, like much other tech out of the 20-21th c, is a net negative. My point was that it's much like a poison that in the right hands can be used as a medicine or as a weapon against the enemy. But for the majority of people and for society as a whole it's a tragedy because it's used as a covert weapon against all of us. It's the greatest spycraft tool ever created.
He's not an atheist. Government trolls don't hold beliefs. He's whatever is useful to get his job done.
Exactly. This behavior is described in NATO's cognitive warfare whitepaper. Their agents are basically trolls who seek to derail public forums on the internet and make engaging in serious discourse online impossible. This way they don't have to deploy heavy handed obvious censorship like during the coof which elicits a strong reaction, while still getting to control the narrative through covert subversive means. Remember the NAFO trolls a few years back? This is it.
The funny thing about all this is that it's all in the open but they mind control and gaslight the dumbed down and confused public into falling for their bs. They know they can't fight the truth directly in logical discourse because they will loose and that's why they employ rhetorical devices, deception and fallacies to appear truthful. Their strategy exploits human weakness, laziness and ignorance which they can control through social engineering.
Did you read this, shills? You are not as smart as you think. We know your playbook and you're not fooling anyone here. In the end truth wins and all you lying goblins and your masters will burn for eternity. Now downvote this like you did with the post in hopes les people will see it.
It's not just the msm. The whole system is fake and gay. It's lies upon lies.
In his Republic, Plato gave the blueprints of how the system is to be governed by a small elite secret society of philosophers who will rule the masses by propping up false narratives "for the greater good" aka the noble lie. Plato is the grandaddy of the technocratic NWO.
While the cave allegory mostly illustrates metaphysical ideas (our realm vs the ideal realm), it also has political connotation in the context above. Plato actually advocated for political theatre.
We're all products of the system to some extent and we live in it, but if one is aware of its mechanism and its purpose he can counter it and avoid the psychological traps. This requires discipline and good habits. If you decide to spend more time doom-scrolling instead of reading a book and researching it's on you. Being focused and productive takes effort and exertion - this is why the masses reject it because they are raised to be passive consumers. You have to limit your information and use fewer channels. Get rid of your smartphone and gadgets that require your constant attention. Don't watch or read mainstream outlets and stress out about stuff you have no power over. Don't get baited and sucked into every single issue that's propped up on the stage. Eat and sleep well, exercise and stay in the sun because all of this is crucial for your cognitive abilities. I think all of this falls under the "being smart" category. The system is the experiment and you have to learn the purpose behind everything you're given and understand how the engineers running it think.
Normies fail at those and they enter a feedback loop that makes them dumber and vice versa - good habits make you exponentially smarter and more capable with time. How you live determines who you are.
Yes, but like other great technologies, it's a double edged sword. It made the masses dumber and more degenerate for sure but it also gave smart people access to knowledge that was reserved for the elite class in the past.
Having red a lot of the elite's writings, it's possible that they do this for eugenic and dysgenic purposes. Jonas Salk called this the survival of the wisest. Both H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell talked about how in the future people will literally be biologically engineered through diet and injections into two separate species. Huxley wrote about a future caste system in his Brave New World. Planned Parenthood director Dr. Day (in the Day tapes) gave a lecture in 1969 where he outlined the same agenda and reasoned in a similar manner.
Not a deflection but a statement of facts. You're not gaslighting anyone in this day and age, perfidious jew.
Exactly. In Acts 10 Peter has a divine vision where he's told that no food is unclean for Christians. The Muslims and the Christian sects mentioned are follow the Mosaic law because they're influenced by rabbinical Judaism and not Christianity.
Of course everyone can view the edits you've made. Why do you play dumb when you can verify this by clicking on the eraser on my comments?