Throughout history, the countries with the smartest people has shifted from one ethnic group to another. Egyptian, Persian, greek, roman and chinese empires were all the most powerful empires in the world over the past 2000 years. They were mostly of different ethnicities and weren't white. Also the romans being white is just complete nonsense, the ancient roman historians described the romans having Mediterranean features in comparison to germans having western european features in contrast.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
You literally can't understand what I'm saying - why do you assume the Nordic people or the Slavs are the standard of whiteness and not the Greek and the Romans? Of course people from the Levant would be genetically closer to southern Europeans because they live in similar climates and are close to each other. That doesn't make them less white though - it makes Levant people closer to whites and not vice versa.
Imagine going to a Julius Caesar and saying to him he's not white because he's not like the barbarians or the vikings. This is the most retarded bs I've heard in a while.
Thanks for destroying your own argument which was that the greatness of a civilization was tied to how smart its people are. Turns out it's all about luck.
Levant Arabs aren’t white, neither are ancient Greeks and southern Italians from the time of Jesus. You can’t just claim they’re white because you feel like it.
A Roman from the time of Jesus would agree that he is a civilized med and not a white “barbarian” because white≠great.
Luck is what makes one ethnicity “smarter” than another. That’s why whites aren’t “genetically” smarter than everybody else and the smartest ethnicity had been changing throughout history.