Paul Ehrlich is a huge proponent of depop and malthusianism.
Since when is a random guy X post credible info? We need some verification and the full story, otherwise I'm calling bs.
No names, no address. Idk, I think there's more to this story than the guy is letting in.
Exactly, the plandemic served as proof it's not an intellectual matter. We saw a bell curve distribution with the majority of the dumbest and the smartest people not buying into the bs and that was on a global scale, so not a cultural thing either.
My analysis:
-
Normies like the system because it feels safe to them and it has been good to them (as far as they know). They are like sheep who trust their shepherd to lead and protect them (hence sheeple).
-
People at the low end of the social ladder (who tend to have lower IQ) have seen the bad side of the system and are instinctively skeptical and wary of it (akin to a dog, wary of his master's disposition and intentions).
-
High IQ people, who are capable of handling complex and highly abstract ideas and exhibit great pattern recognition and rigorous systematical thinking, have done research and came to the conclusion that the system is not to be trusted. They can back up their claims with argumentation.
You hit the nail on the head. the NWO liberal-democratic regime is more advanced than the soviet regime was in terms of mind controlling and conditioning the population. They've made considerable progress just like they did in other fields of technology like biotech, surveillance and data collection.
Solzhenitsyn wrote about this psychological phenomenon a lot.
Nietzsche made that point. Normies fit the definition of his Last man.
I think they do have beliefs, opinions and convictions but they mostly stand on shaky ground, are superficial in their comportment with reality and are unexamined. That's because they didn't come to those beliefs themselves but were indoctrinated by the system from an early age through society, education and media.
I can remember the time I was somewhat of a normie and I most definitely wholeheartedly believed the things I thought about the world and eventually I came to realize most of it was some default programming and not the result of conscious and independent research of information and reasoning. The good news is that once this realization comes, there's no coming back and a person will deprogram himself.
They are basically defending the normie worldview either by avoiding information that can potentially expose it as wrong or by rationalizing newfound information forcing it to fit within their paradigm (that's the point when you hear them say outlandish and incoherent stuff; they will even make up their own conspiracy theories as a coping mechanism).
Pareto principle - 20% truly believe, the rest just follow because they're sheeple.
Awakening isn't about knowing a bunch of stuff and stacking folders, it's about facing the truth. In the end it's a moral choice and standing for what's true and right. Normies are that way because of their underlying worldview which prevents them from interpreting information correctly. No amount of facts and evidence will correct that (unless they're open to change and are willing to de-program themselves).
He most definitely is. He does child sacrifices on the side too.
Well, it will happen eventually. I've cashed out the majority of my wealth and put it into gold and BTC.
Exactly. It comes straight from the horse's mouth but normies will be normies and will hold to their regime-sanctioned irrational beliefs no matter what.
"Scientific research" for the past few decades has been completely fake and gay. This has been intimated by A. Huxley (Royal Society fabian socialist) in Brave New World in the chapter where the main hero meets the technocratic controller Mustapha Mond, who gets to decide what will be published based on ideological principles.
Any book on Modern monetary theory. This is mainstream knowledge and even the wiki page says it openly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_monetary_theory
MMT maintains that the level of taxation relative to government spending (the government's deficit spending or budget surplus) is in reality a policy tool that regulates inflation and unemployment, and not a means of funding the government's activities by itself. MMT states that the government is the monopoly issuer of the currency and therefore must spend currency into existence before any tax revenue could be collected.[1] The government spends currency into existence and taxpayers use that currency to pay their obligations to the state.[2] This means that taxes cannot fund public spending,[3] as the government cannot collect money back in taxes until after it is already in circulation. In this currency system, the government is never constrained in its ability to pay,[3] rather the limits are the real resources available for purchase in the currency.[3]
If you want the scoop behind the history of banking and central banking then:
-
A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind by S. Goodson (audio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMuXQJIfmLI&list=PLZ7GdlPK75_tXJYVzkCId2SYEjBLjnU9E)
-
E. Mullins - Secrets of the Fed
-
G. E. Griffith - The Creature from Jekyll Island
It's much worse. The chief editor of the Lancet wrote an article saying at least half of peer-reviewed papers are likely false.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext
If facts mattered, this should be enough to make every normie soyence enjoyer shut up when waxing poetic about "muh science" and "muh experts".
This is not even counting the crazy amount of conflict of interests, revolving door authors and bought academics and institutions that plague scientific research. Only a complete tool who is clueless about the world, history, common sense and human nature can believe science can't be corrupted or bought. And you shouldn't waste time arguing with such NPCs to begin with.
When someone is in this state, it doesnt matter what you say, in my experience. Theyve already closed their minds off.
This is the only meaningful distinction between people when it comes to arguments. It's not a matter of knowledge, facts, IQ. You can't make a person see something if he doesn't want to. It's a moral problem really.
Is the NWO and the impending technocracy built on religion (Christianity) or atheism and scientism?
What was the promoted worldview in the communist revolutions of the past like the French, the Bolshevik or the Maoist revolutions which instantiated the most totalitarian regimes in terms of physical and psychological control of people known in history?
What is the underlying system in predictive novels like 1984 and Brave New World?
In the end you too belief in things you can't really justify. Not only that - I'd argue you hold a contradictory worldview and I can demonstrate it in a debate. I've dealt with many atheists and their arguments are always reddit-tier. I've come to the conclusion atheists never know basic philosophy, including philosophy of science, and yet they make sweeping claims about what is, what and can be known, how we have knowledge etc. Most of them don't even know who David Hume is.
Within dependence to what? To depend implies "attached to cause", which contradicts cause generating effects by separating each from one another.
Independent from the status quo and the world. As in being able to think universally and in absolute terms instead of being dependent on your circumstance, immediate environment and subjective condition.
a) How can there be anything above ALL?
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” - John 8:32
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - John 14:6
b) Love vs hate and truth vs lies implies different sides turning against one another, hence not openness, but closeness.
Openness (of heart) is necessary for one to see the truth. Openness is not lack of distinction and doesn't imply relativism here (as in Popper's Open Society).
Normies can't be intellectuals in the real sense of the word. Being an intellectual requires independent thought, entertaining different possibilities (openness), critical thinking, analyzing information and putting it in a coherent theory, and most important of all - love of truth above all.
Good point. Modern atheism/agnosticism (an euphemism for satanism and anti-christianity), dressed as scientism and rational skepticism, is a demonic (jewish) psy op. Not only it subverts people's belief in the Christian God, but also makes them accustomed to the idea that there is no purpose in the world, that everything is a result of a random cause and effect mechanism and is therefore completely coincidental and ultimately meaningless.
In the atheist worldview there is no grand scheme of things, no planning, no conspiring happening on any level, even in the incredibly complex design of our world. It's just random atoms bumping into each other, resulting in intricate patterns of structure and behavior. Same goes for organizations of people and society - it's all random, bro.
Atheism and materialism programs people to be coincidence theorists. I can guarantee the guy in the OP story was one of them.
I don't know what you mean by that. Is that a user in here? A youtube channel, or some place else? And what opinion is that exactly? I don't understand the reference.
https://acallforanuprising.com/
He has a paywall but his videos are on rumble, bitchute and he used to be on youtube but got deleted 80+ times. Still makes new channels though. This is his last one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAAi1afIozY
I don't buy the Epstein files. It seems too convenient to have him as a mainstream story in the first place. You'll never hear about people like Epstein outside of a psy op - the government and mainstream media will protect them at all cost. This whole ordeal with Trump doing an obvious 180 and calling his fanboys idiots for believing in the Epstein narrative is straight up kayfabe. He basically turned heel. If he were protecting his jewish friends for real, he would have been much smarter about it and would be looking to save face while doing it like any politician would.
And the reason they dropped Epstein on the public was to distract us from the real conspiracy which gained too much traction and even normies started digging into it - Pizzagate.
Don't get me wrong, I believe Trump is compromised but Epstein, while most likely a Mossad agent, was probably not what we were made to believe he was.
I agree with ACallForAnUprising on this.
Trump is nuking himself by design of course. It's all about making Elon look appealing for the next round of fake wwe elections.
TL;DR
It was DARPA. They "bought" the domain and later created facebook. It was all planned back in the early 90's probably part of the Club of Rome, SRI, Bilderberg, Trilateral, CFR, RAND, Tavistock agenda.
Great find btw.
BTC is not becoming CBDC. It's a decentralized network belonging to the people who own BTC. Government and bankers can't do shit about it.
Normies who don't own BTC will be peasants in the NWO grid system while BTC holders will be able to afford a good life not caring about CO2 rations and getting stabbies to access their CBDC wallet.