Normies can't be intellectuals in the real sense of the word. Being an intellectual requires independent thought, entertaining different possibilities (openness), critical thinking, analyzing information and putting it in a coherent theory, and most important of all - love of truth above all.
Within dependence to what? To depend implies "attached to cause", which contradicts cause generating effects by separating each from one another.
different possibilities (openness)...and most important of all - love of truth above all.
a) How can there be anything above ALL?
b) Love vs hate and truth vs lies implies different sides turning against one another, hence not openness, but closeness.
analyzing information
Nature doesn't generate information, but inspiration. Information is shaped within nature by ones consent to the suggestion of another aka a synthesis...not an analysis.
critical thinking
Critic/krinein - "to separate"...holding onto "love of truth" implies attachment, while ignoring separation.
Sleight of hand: "everyone's a critic", because ONE implies separation from one another.
Within dependence to what? To depend implies "attached to cause", which contradicts cause generating effects by separating each from one another.
Independent from the status quo and the world. As in being able to think universally and in absolute terms instead of being dependent on your circumstance, immediate environment and subjective condition.
a) How can there be anything above ALL?
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” - John 8:32
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - John 14:6
b) Love vs hate and truth vs lies implies different sides turning against one another, hence not openness, but closeness.
Openness (of heart) is necessary for one to see the truth. Openness is not lack of distinction and doesn't imply relativism here (as in Popper's Open Society).
a) Status (state) + quo (within which) aka status (ones perception) quo (all perceivable)...once again implying a separation from one another, while dependence implies attaching self (consent) to another (suggested).
b) World/worold - "human secular existence" from secular/saecularis/sai - "to bind; tie"...the word "world" is being suggested to distract from the status (perception) quo (perceivable).
being able to think universally
a) Being able implies being (life) enabled (inception towards death)...linear progression.
b) Uni (one) vers (to turn) implies turning against one another...circular thinking.
c) VERS tempts UNI to ignore ALL...it's a crafted spell. Only one within all can see this; while others are blind to it by turning against each other.
in absolute terms
a) Absolute (free from limitation) contradicts term (boundary)
b) Being implies free (choice) within limitation (balance), hence not bound, but set free (living) during limitation (dying).
c) The trick...terminology aka suggested terms tempting ones consent into circular logic, hence binding self to another aka ones choice to a chosen one.
circumstance
Aka ones stance within a circle...as opposed to ones stance (life) within linear progression (inception towards death).
A kike/kikel - "circle" erects at center while circumcising circumference...
immediate environment
Im (within) mediate (middle) + en (within) viron (circle) ment (mind)...ones consent to any suggestion permits another to mediate information into ones mind, where one holds into during circular thinking (logic), which outwardly turns into conflicts of reason against others.
IM + EN implies "within" one...not the suggested "immediate environment" outside of one. Only oneself can see through this deception, because anything another suggests comes from outside self.
And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
KNOW (perceivable) sets FREE (perception)...truth/treowð - "faith; pledge, covenant" binds one to one another.
Notice also...truth/deru - "be firm, solid". Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Truth tempts form to pledge to other form (Jesus Christ), while ignoring flow (God).
That pledge of faith implies religion aka RE (to respond) LIGO (to bind)...
Jesus said to him, “I am...
Je suis (I am)...why would I AM say I AM? Because...
I am what I am
I am my own special creation
So come take a look
Give me the hook or the ovation
It's my world that I want to have a little pride in
Openness (of heart) is necessary for one to see the truth...
...and yet the mind holds onto the truth, while blinding ones outward sight inwardly.
Also...necessity was before heart comes into being. It's inception opening and death closing necessity for each ones life within.
Openness is not lack of distinction
Using IS implies a synthesis between suggestion and consent, which when consented to...makes distinction unrecognizable.
Nature WAS perceivable before a being within can suggest what it IS to one another.
is not lack of
Is implies vs isn't...there's the "lack of". One cannot suggest what anything is without implying what it isn't. It's suggestion which conjures consent into a lack of aka into nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing).
is...doesn't imply relativism
Relate/relatus - "to carry back" hence carrying suggested information back from perceivable inspiration, while tempting the consent of another to burden self with it.
It's the -ism which shapes a suggestion out of perceivable re-lat-ion aka action carrying back (inception towards death) reaction (life).
open society
Society/sekw - "to follow"...life can only follow opening (inception) towards closing (death), which life needs to resist the wanted temptation of.
Normies can't be intellectuals in the real sense of the word. Being an intellectual requires independent thought, entertaining different possibilities (openness), critical thinking, analyzing information and putting it in a coherent theory, and most important of all - love of truth above all.
Within dependence to what? To depend implies "attached to cause", which contradicts cause generating effects by separating each from one another.
a) How can there be anything above ALL?
b) Love vs hate and truth vs lies implies different sides turning against one another, hence not openness, but closeness.
Nature doesn't generate information, but inspiration. Information is shaped within nature by ones consent to the suggestion of another aka a synthesis...not an analysis.
Critic/krinein - "to separate"...holding onto "love of truth" implies attachment, while ignoring separation.
Sleight of hand: "everyone's a critic", because ONE implies separation from one another.
Independent from the status quo and the world. As in being able to think universally and in absolute terms instead of being dependent on your circumstance, immediate environment and subjective condition.
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” - John 8:32
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - John 14:6
Openness (of heart) is necessary for one to see the truth. Openness is not lack of distinction and doesn't imply relativism here (as in Popper's Open Society).
a) Status (state) + quo (within which) aka status (ones perception) quo (all perceivable)...once again implying a separation from one another, while dependence implies attaching self (consent) to another (suggested).
b) World/worold - "human secular existence" from secular/saecularis/sai - "to bind; tie"...the word "world" is being suggested to distract from the status (perception) quo (perceivable).
a) Being able implies being (life) enabled (inception towards death)...linear progression.
b) Uni (one) vers (to turn) implies turning against one another...circular thinking.
c) VERS tempts UNI to ignore ALL...it's a crafted spell. Only one within all can see this; while others are blind to it by turning against each other.
a) Absolute (free from limitation) contradicts term (boundary)
b) Being implies free (choice) within limitation (balance), hence not bound, but set free (living) during limitation (dying).
c) The trick...terminology aka suggested terms tempting ones consent into circular logic, hence binding self to another aka ones choice to a chosen one.
Aka ones stance within a circle...as opposed to ones stance (life) within linear progression (inception towards death).
A kike/kikel - "circle" erects at center while circumcising circumference...
Im (within) mediate (middle) + en (within) viron (circle) ment (mind)...ones consent to any suggestion permits another to mediate information into ones mind, where one holds into during circular thinking (logic), which outwardly turns into conflicts of reason against others.
IM + EN implies "within" one...not the suggested "immediate environment" outside of one. Only oneself can see through this deception, because anything another suggests comes from outside self.
KNOW (perceivable) sets FREE (perception)...truth/treowð - "faith; pledge, covenant" binds one to one another.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/truth
Notice also...truth/deru - "be firm, solid". Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Truth tempts form to pledge to other form (Jesus Christ), while ignoring flow (God).
That pledge of faith implies religion aka RE (to respond) LIGO (to bind)...
Je suis (I am)...why would I AM say I AM? Because...
https://genius.com/Gloria-gaynor-i-am-what-i-am-lyrics ...produced by... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Diamond
...and yet the mind holds onto the truth, while blinding ones outward sight inwardly.
Also...necessity was before heart comes into being. It's inception opening and death closing necessity for each ones life within.
Using IS implies a synthesis between suggestion and consent, which when consented to...makes distinction unrecognizable.
Nature WAS perceivable before a being within can suggest what it IS to one another.
Is implies vs isn't...there's the "lack of". One cannot suggest what anything is without implying what it isn't. It's suggestion which conjures consent into a lack of aka into nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing).
Relate/relatus - "to carry back" hence carrying suggested information back from perceivable inspiration, while tempting the consent of another to burden self with it.
It's the -ism which shapes a suggestion out of perceivable re-lat-ion aka action carrying back (inception towards death) reaction (life).
Society/sekw - "to follow"...life can only follow opening (inception) towards closing (death), which life needs to resist the wanted temptation of.
Follow aka to fall low...how about: "Rising High Rising High let your will fly high".... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imR_Sbkjq84