1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Holy Spirit was given to us after Christ's death and resurrection.

The Holy Spirit was sent to the Apostles at Pentecost (tongues of fire), which is when the Church was established (the 12 Apostles became the new Israel which was previously the 12 tribes). The Holy Spirit, while not limited to it, indwells the Church which is the Body of Christ, where the fullness of grace is to be found in the sacraments.

"Born again" is an ahistorical heretical movement that originates from evangelical protestantism. While I agree Lewis was not Orthodox and favored branch theory, I don't think you're in a position to call him a heretic. He had valuable insights that every Christian can find useful and I believe his heart was in the right place.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the most sure way to get spiritually deluded (prelest). One of Christ's apostles got demonically possessed but somehow you are in the clear? Makes total sense.

We have to fight sin and the demons until our very dying breath because they will attack you the moment your guard is down. Even saints had to fend demons off and you think you're above them?

Read Screwtape letters by C.S. Lewis.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

If reality is an illusion, so is the external world, your senses, science and knowledge itself. You just refuted yourself.

Everything we call "real" is an illusion generated by our Mind. Science has shown...

Just wow. You really wrote that in one single breath and saw no problem in it. How are people like you even functioning?

See people, this is the level of confusion and doublethink the establishment wants to put people in. This is scary MK-Ultra stuff. Complete degradation of the mind and of reason. Name definitely checks out. How many DMT trips have you been on, dude?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole point is to exclude money with all problems they produce from society.

So what do you do when you need someone to build you a house using your free replicator bricks? You keep saying money won't be needed but how will people exchange services and what will incentivize people to do such work for others?

No, He didn't. And He didn't say anything opposite. God told them - "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the Earth and subdue it.". That's all. That's not even a commandment, just "good luck" to beloved ones, before the start of endless and unpredictable journey of humanity.

Only when Jews separated themselves from all other people and turned to pure evil, resulting in disgust from any people they tried to live with, He gave them commandments in attempt to save them. This didn't work for long. Then God send His Son to them, in a last attempt to save them, and they just killed Christ.

So you just glossed over the commandment God gave Adam and Eve - not to eat the fruit? Don't you understand that what happened in the Garden, that disobedience towards God, repeats throughout the whole Bible narrative and not only with the jews but before them and after them when Christ made a covenant with all people? Neither Adam, nor Noah or Abraham were jews. God had to flood the world because of how lawless and degenerate people have become - this was long before any jews. The tower of Babel wasn't built by jews. The Baal worshipping nations weren't jewsih (yes jews too worshipped Baal in the OT). Pagan Rome wasn't jewish. Yes jews killed Christ and that was done by divine providence so that all the nations can know Him and become the new Israel (yes, the Orthodox Church is the Heavenly Israel, not a damn socialist state in the Middle East filled with khazarians).

For us, normal people, Christ show direction, in two simple sentences, not set the rules or whatever. He show us the way, and it's completely up to us how to walk it.

He literally said that the path is straight and narrow, meaning you can't wander off and do whatever you like. The way to truth and life is not a sandbox but a very strict and limiting path that few manage to follow. It takes a huge effort to be a Christian and Christ wants us to be able to let go of everything in this world and follow him to the path of self sacrifice, with our cross on our back.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

And there is no any mention of money in that God ordnance.

Come on, dude that's a red herring. Money's not the problem. Money is the solution to the problem of determining value of different goods and services. Man has to do work to sustain himself. If your system makes it so that man doesn't have to work to sustain himself, money or not, it's not how God ordained it and it's unnatural. It's a synthetic system created with the aid of technology.

Because it is unnatural, just like artificial food.

Exactly, same as not having to work to sustain yourself. This is why it's a double standard.

I don't think that food from replicator will be popular. People will always prefer real food, grown by themselves. And replicator will allow to have all tech to do that with minimum efforts and maximum efficiency.

Then people still have to work to produce food? How is that any different than today when agriculture is mechanized and so much easier than in the past?

Globalist experimetns with artificial food failed miserably. People don't want food made from chemicals on factories even if they barely distinguishable from real ones. People need and want natural food. Most just have no spare time to grow it, so they have to buy it from BigAgro.

No one will ask them. If food production and supply is controlled centrally you will eat whatever you're told to. The majority of people today eat completely fake processed garbage but they've come to believe it's food because of marketing and propaganda. Not only can people be deceived into eating garbage but they can also be forced into it.

That's the point of science and technology. You could separate good things from bad things and use only good ones.

You need a criteria for what's good to do so. What is it?

Again, you for whatever reason accept "transhumanism" exactly like globohomos want it be accepted. They lie about everything, then why do you believe them that "transhumanism" thing is what they told you?

Because it's an ideology that traces back to the Enlightenment and I know what it is based on. It's a tradition and not something Klaus Schwab or the skittles jew Harari came up with during a WEF conference. I read a lot of old books and study the origin of ideas, that's how I know.

Transhumanism, apart from globohomo definition, in whole is changing human body in some way.

When you visit stomatologist to implant a tooth you lost, it is transhumanism. Is it inherently bad to have a tooth implant? I don't think so. What if you will be able just grow new tooth instead of lost one? Will it be against God ordnance or not?

No, that's an oversimplification and reductionism. Not all technology equates to transhumanism. In fact as we read in the Bible, clothes were the first technology given to man after the fall (garments of skin). So just like money, technology is not bad in itself (unless you're a retarded Amish or a deranged luddite).

A more appropriate definition would be changing man's nature according to a man made concept of what man should become. Notice that there's nothing inherently wrong in transcending human nature, because that's literally what Christianity is all about - becoming gods by theosis. The reason why transhumanism is satanic is because it seeks to do so without God - to make us gods on our own merit through our own reason and means. This is literally what Satan did when he rebelled and what he meant when he told Eve to eat the fruit of knowledge and to become like God (hence Apple's logo and Macintosh I costing $666).

God created us in His image and likeness. He even gave us free will, just like He have. And then you say that there is some predefined way of how and what we can do with material world. It completely contradicts with God's intentions to create beings in His image and likeness with free will. There is no any point to create beings with free will, and then limit them in using their free will.

Did God tell man "here, do whatever you feel like, man"? What kind of liberal theology is this? Of course God set rules to how we are supposed to live. He gave commandments and set up His Church to teach all the nations about how to live righteously. What does free will have to do with any of this?

It's absolutely bizarre to hear a Christian think God didn't set strict rules of conduct that set boundaries and limits our free will. Such limits were set even before the fall when God commanded not to eat from the trees of knowledge and life. Then came the Noahide laws, the Mosaic laws and finally, Christ - God in the flesh - came and gave His own teachings. Do you think God is an anarchist? I'm stunned dude, I can't go on even... Just go to Church and talk to a priest because you're very confused about the faith. Read the Church fathers. You're lucky you're in Russia too so it's easy to do so. I'm not saying this as an own but as a fellow Christian. We all need the Church, otherwise we get confused in our own interpretations.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point I made was that man having to work and suffer to put bread on the table is not only natural, but ordained by God Himself. But your system wants to do away with this natural order of things through technology. Why not also alleviate women's suffering due to childbirth and get rid of childbearing, replacing it with replicators/lab babies?

This is basically transhumanism but you cherry pick things you like and want to preserve which is a double standard.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Manson was a deranged MK Ultra cult leader. His influence on the hippy movement was miniscule. He was just a pawn.

As for the Beatles, John Coleman says that critical theorist Theodor Adorno of the Frankfurt School wrote their songs and the band itself was a Tavistock project. You don't get any more establishment than this.

7
SmithW1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's true.

Yoga is a hindu religious practice that is promoted in the West as part of the NWO agenda of subverting Christian based society and installing a new age religion, amenable to the future world government.

Eastern religions were selected for the task because they are antithetical to Christianity. They are pantheistic and monistic ("everything is God"/"we're all One") where the individual person is dissolved into multiplicity (hence why India is a shithole country where human life was never of any value). Personhood (ego) itself is viewed as problematic and something to be transcended by way of eliminating all borders and distinctions between you and the rest of people or nature (seem familiar? yep, it's the skittles DEI doctrine, cultural pluralism and open borders).

They also posit that reality is an illusion (basically metaverse), that we need to escape from. People who hold such believes are primed to enter a completely virtual world because they view life itself as virtual and not real.

There's obviously a spiritual element to all this being demonic worship, witchcraft, spiritual delusion and idolatry.

The globalist elites like the Huxley's, Jung, Campbell, Salk, Atlee, Kostler, H.G. Wells have written many books on the topic so we don't have to speculate and guess what it's about.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt about majority. But such people definitely exist. So what? If their UBI will be produced by replicator and not by your labour, then what's the problem?

Typical liberal/libertarian logic. The problem is that you'll have to coexist in a society along with degenerates. Why do lolberts act as if what you do in private doesn't spill out in the public? Man is not an island and lives in communities. How will your system promote a virtuous and healthy community? It won't, it's just geared towards getting everyone's needs met. It's the hedonistic liberal paradise.

You are too pessimistic about human nature and psychology to the same extent.

I'm just aware of the fallen human nature. I've red how people lived throughout history. I see how they do now. The easiest way to degenerate an individual and society is to tell him to do whatever they like, to "emancipate" them from duties and authorities. This is why jews have been pushing this liberal ideology for the past few centuries and have managed to completely transform society into what it is today. People are easily corruptible through their passions and vices and the establishment's methods have only gotten more sophisticated with time.

Also you miss a huge part of human activity that could not be covered by any replicators. You still have to make family, grow and educate your children, grow real food and not because you can't make it, but because it is in human nature, and so on.

Who will govern this tech paradise? Who will own the infrastructure, take care of it and make those replicators? Amazon? Tyrell Corp? Skynet?

Why would you need to make families and have children? What is the arbitrary criteria for what "human nature" is? Maybe we should transcend it do away with those things the way we did with the need to work? Isn't this also part of human nature:

“Cursed is the ground for your sake; In toil you shall eat of it All the days of your life. 18 Both thorns and thistles it shall [f]bring forth for you, And you shall eat the herb of the field. 19 In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread Till you return to the ground, For out of it you were taken; For dust you are, And to dust you shall return.”

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like in old soviet definition - "from each by abilities, for each according to the needs" Just without all that common property and common work using common means of production bullshit in marxist version. Same scheme, another principle. Just like when Jesus fed thousands with few loafs and fishes.

This is not a just system and no one would feel obliged to put in hard work so that some lazy bum could get the same benefits. I'd much rather have the Christian charity model where it is one's duty to help those less fortunate or in need. Don't need no communism for that.

You are mistaken about free time, being right about everything else. People have much less free time, than before. In the past, most people was peasants, and peasants job is seasonal. Yes, they had periods of hard work, but at least winter was mostly free time. Few of modern people could allow three months vacations.

I'm aware but peasants still had way less leisure time and didn't live to get retirement and do jack shit all day. Times were rough and death, war and starvation were common occurance. You had to fight for your existence and natural selection worked full force.

In comparison, most people today have 4-6 hours of free time during the day. In the degenerate west people have it so easy, that they can literally live in their own made up reality and pretend to be the opposite sex and even get medical help for that. In the past mental illness meant death, now they run parades. Not to mention how much easier everything is made through technology, transportation and the internet. You can practically exist without leaving your room and all your basic needs will be met.

There always some occupation could be found. If you need to be forced to work to keep you from sinful thoughts, then something is wrong with your brains.

You realize that the majority of people, if given UBI and no incentive to work will indulge in the vices and become hedonistic degenerates, right? To put it bluntly, they will goon all thay long and order door dash (much like they did during the plandemic psy op which was a beta test for what's coming). Have you heard of moustopia?

I always laugh at the soy-fi nerds who were sold visions of a highly advanced future technocracy (Brave new world style) where everyone has all their needs met and is engaged with pursuing studying, creating, making art and other high brow or innocuous activities. Those people are absolutely naive about human nature and psychology. This illuminist propaganda originated way back in the Enlightenment and it is getting more ridiculous by each passing year since then.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's easy - it's the Christian God. It makes all the more sense when you know the so called deep state is mostly jewish.

They had to stop the love movement of the 1960s because if that love energy spreads worldwide, the deep state would have nowhere to run and would have to either convert to the light or leave the whole planet.

Lol. The new age hippy movement was literally ran by the CIA, the Pentagon, the Rockefeller Foundation, SRI, Tavistock and other establishment think tanks.

Those foundations pushed eastern culture and hindu and buddhist religious practices in the West. They literally brought hindu gurus to teach yoga classes at Woodstock.

The jewish ran Hollywood at that time made countless propaganda movies like Hair. The jewish ran music industry was all in on the hippy music. They pushed the Beatles and emphasized their adoption of zen and hinduism.

Timothy Leary, the godfather of LSD was a spook.

Huxley, a Royal Society darling, wrote the Doors of perception and other books promoting eastern spirituality and perenialism.

SRI published a book serving as a blueprint for the technocrats called Changing images of man which promoted new age and festivals.

I can go on for days. Imagine thinking the social revolution of the 60's was a grass roots movement in 2025. You have no idea what you're talking about.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

You posit a fake dialectic between communism and capitalism, which reminds me of the fake and gay left/right divide created by the talmudic freemasons. What's funny is that the future global technocracy will be a synthesis of communism and capitalism and even Marx argued that capitalism is a needed stepping stone to communism. Both represent a humanistic liberal secular and talmudic system that opposes God.

Marxist version communism definitely is. Just like modern version of capitalism. There is nothing Christian in both. Both are a tool for jews to opress people and extract wealth from them.

Ok, let's hear your version of communism that is good and not at odds with Christianity. Summarize it in short.

On the opposite, I state that when you are in eternal cycle of moneymaking to satisfy your needs, you are not free enough to think about your soul.

People have more free time today and live a much more secure, comfortable and easy lives compared to the past. Meanwhile, godlesness, idol worship and degeneracy is at an all time high in countries that were very much Christian and people attended Church daily. Your argument runs contrary to historical evidence. If you read proverbs, you'd see that work is what keeps man away from sinful thoughts and deeds and that sin's best friend is boredom and idleness.

But sure, chasing after money and running the rat race is not good either.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

but unfortunately Adam and Eve sinned so everyone is stuck with a sin nature.

But God has given His Son for our salvation, defeating death and restoring our fallen nature (by assuming it and lifting it up), so that we can become gods (lowercase) and live forever in His Heavenly Kingdom.

Heaven is open for each one of us if only we are in communion with Christ in His Church and follow His testament. What's the point of Star Trek communism if it doesn't help people know and love God? Maybe we need to struggle and be wanting, and that suffering will bring us closer to Him?

Did Jesus say pragmatism, having things and being well off will get you to heaven or was it the opposite? He taught that slaves should obey their masters and people should obey the law and their leaders under fear of death because all authority is given by God. So much for liberal masonic pseudo-christianity's equality and liberty. God is literally the king of this world and the world, his monarchy, has a hierarchical structure. Communism fights against this divine order and is satanic.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Again, you are more marxist than me. :) Or at least under heavy marxist propaganda, regardless of sign.

Says the guy who posts about how wonderful communism would be if done right. Communism is talmudic in origin fyi. There's a reason why every zionist was a commie and why the jewish headed French and Bolshevik revolutions where also communist.

Communism is antithetical to Christianity both in theory and in practice. Money is not intrinsically evil or bad and neither is having property. Christ teaches us that what's sinful is the love of money/avarice and of holding on to worldly things. Your line of reasoning is similar to the Russian gnostic skoptsy who chopped off their wieners because they believed sexuality to be inherently bad.

PS: The peak of irony here is that Star Trek, as all sci fi, is socialist and illuminist propaganda itself (promoting scientific internationalism guised as "interplanetarism") and it definitely worked on you.

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then, the whole concept of money, profit and so political and economic power, which are foundation of modern world become null and void.

Wrong marxist materialist assumption. The reason behind inequality, greed and evil is not material needs that have not been met and can't be mended by material means. The reason is the fallen nature of humanity and of this world - money exists because man loves power and wants to dominate over other men, not because of pure pragmatic reason like you buying stuff with it. Even if everyone's needs are completely satisfied you'd still have crime because sin is not rational or pragmatic - people will commit crime just for the sake of it (you're a Russian, right - haven't you red Dostoyevsky?)

You can't cure the world of evil by producing more stuff, this is retarded utopianism and history has shown time and time again the root of evil is spiritual and not material. Adam and Eve literally lived in paradise and had everything and they still rebelled and fell out of communion with God because their free will allowed them to be deceived.

No political or economical system can bring salvation - salvation is only through Christ and His Church.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's too much disinfo on the shots. Even if it were self-assambaling nanotech, there aren't good studies proving this beyond any doubt. Suffice to say they are gene therapy products as classified by the FDA and EMA, so yes it's gene therapy which can enter the cell nucleus.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Calling me stupid without addressing what I said is not the win you think it is. Ironically this is what the 100 IQ gang tends to do.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you mean it's just a building?

Come on dude. It's as much "just a building" as you're just a physical body.

No, it's the Body of Christ which is both physical and spiritual. Both are part of the historic manifestation of the Church here on Earth - the one holy universal and apostolic Church established by Christ and guided by the Holy Spirit who descended upon the apostles on Pentecost as Christ had promised. The apostles passed the Spirit to their disciples by the laying of hands (one of the holy sacraments of the Church).

This sacrament continues to our day and forms a continuous succession tracing back to the apostles and ultimately to Christ who is the head of the Church.

The Church is also called the Ark of the new covenant because those who are in it will be saved from the flood (in this case the Second Coming). The Church is also called the bride to the groom who is Christ - as in the parable, we are all invited to the wedding but only those who come dressed appropriately (the righteous, having good deeds and who repent from sin) and in time (while on this Earth) will be admitted to it.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is old. I believe I already addressed most of them in other threads. I wouldn't waste time on the details and separate claims, but I'd take him up on the paradigm level and ask him about his epistemic criteria, i.e. how he comes to knowledge about the things he asserts and what his justification is.

But there's no use because I don't think he would even understand the criticism considering the low tier arguments and word-concept fallacies he makes.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

Close but not quite. Yes, gold is controlled by the bankers and governments. Every money is of artificial value so that's a stupid argument. Unless you directly trade with goods and services, a symbolic value, recognized as sound money will be used for the transaction. Welcome to economy 101.

The question is what money is sound, reliable, universal and least subject to fluctuations and speculation.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Such high quality posts. Keep on shitposting so that relevant posts get buried - you're doing their job.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Writing this in caps doesn't make it less retarded.

Nobody takes the Nobel peace prize seriously. There will be no hot war - the warmongering is fake and gay psy op to get people demoralized and ready for the Great reset, gradual depop, the AI Beast system and deindustrialization. It's basically a continuation of the cold war which successfully achieved its goals of globalization and reeducation of the populace with the post-WWII NWO narrative (the fake and gay dialectic authoritarian socialism-East/democratic capitalism-West).

Only midwit normies believe there will be WWIII at this point. The elites don't want to destroy the world - they want to control it.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow so based! It's a smart grid city ran by AI, but there is a bit of astro turf for the sterilized slave and his dog at least.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean looking at money supply FED charts, it started back in late 2019 (hence why the coof scenario was drummed up). It's not just the countries going bankrupt - the whole Keynsian central banking fiat system is going to be tanked along with the ridiculous monopoly money (USD, EUR, GBP, YEN) that are backed by shit. The US is already bankrupted (125% debt of GDP). So are most of EU countries (Italy has a debt over 140% of their GDP which is way past the point of no return which is 90%; France is close, followed by Britain and Germany will get there too).

It may take some time, but it seems they plan it for 2030 (yes, that's mostly what the Great Reset is about). They want to build back better the whole financial system and it will be fully digital, biometric and centralized this time - the Beast system.

I laugh at normies who think things are just going to magically get better. Absolutely delusional people with zero knowledge of basic finance and economy (I'm no expert myself, but one has to research to the best of their ability because it's important).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›