2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it's not just a theory but a proven conspiracy.

0
SmithW1984 0 points ago +2 / -2

How are things going now in Germany - the most cucked nation of all times? The Furher and his butt buddies did great now that the Learned Elders of the have the world in the palm of their Hidden Hand and are on the cusp of their final revolution.

NatSoc was propped up the same way the Bolsheviks were - by the international jewish bankers. Both Hitler and Stalin served as the antithesis for democratic capitalism that helped bring about the synthesis - the emerging socialist world order out of the ruins of the former monarchies. The Great wars rituals for creating the world anew (which coincidentally is the Fabian socialist moto).

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point. I don't think secularists and nihilist have any reason to oppose digital ID, transhumanism or one world government. How is any of that bad in their worldview? The whole idea of The Tower of Babel, the antichrist and the beast system is based on Christianity and our apocalypse and eschatology.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's not mine and it's not a conspiracy. It's all public knowledge. Look up the Haavara agreement. Read C. Quigley's Tragedy and Hope section about Hitler. Read Anthony Sutton's Wall Str. and the Rise of Hitler. Maybe read more and write less in general because you never have anything of value to say.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Weren't you opposed to the nazis, Mossad shill? Forgot to switch the accounts?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +5 / -4

Amazing how easy it is to bait people in the same shit that got us here. Hitler was propped up to justify Israel and the NWO. The idea of a tyrannical leader bent on world domination and the killing off all jews is so over the top and Biblical that anyone with a functioning brain should see how fake and gay it was. Of course, behind the scenes jews were actually being settled in the Palestine en masse (the Haavara agreement).

This controlled dialectic and radicalization of opposition has always been their strategy. That's why Mossad got rid of Asaad, PLO and the moderates and propped up Hamas. They want to repeat that it seems and all the neo-nazi idiots are falling for this.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Rome actually taught that Jews and Muslims by their systems' theology already worshipped God the Father (who is always one with the Son if he is to be worshipped at all), that would be pretty clearly contrary to prior teaching, which is why I'm confident the casuists permitted the phrasing that retains ambiguity

It is contradictory and it is obvious. The whole Vatican II ecumenist position and the prior scholastic natural theology doctrine is incompatible with the teaching of the Church that Christ is the only path to God the Father. This is why you don't put reasoning and empiricism before divine Revelation.

The whole RC system is full of such contradictions. Remember when the Pope called crusades against Islam which was condemned as satanic heresy by Rome? The same office of the Roman See now calls for open borders and talks about how the Muslims adore the one true God. Come on. Forget the semantics and how they can massage language to make you believe gray is white (because saying black is white is too obvious and they're incrementalist). Just step back and look at what the current position is and compare to what the position 1000 years ago was. And that's just a single issue. Don't get me started on the skittles stuff, the raves and clown masses.

0
SmithW1984 0 points ago +2 / -2

I understand where you come from and I'm sure you're truly seeking the true Church. While Vatican II is obviously bad, Vatican I was problematic too because it declared papal supremacy and infallibility (which is obviously bunk considering recent Popes). But even historically, this was not how the early Church was structured and operated (for example, the Fifth Ecumenical Council threatened to excommunicate Pope Vigilius over heretical teachings - if the Pope was truly the supreme authority over the Church this wouldn't be possible because his teaching would be normative).

If you're considering SSPX you may find this helpful (Jay was a former trad cath himself): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWqzCSAeUtU

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

To adore and contemplate is, for casuists like the pope, not to worship. He's trying to be kissy with them and find commonalities and still not press Christian tradition beyond its guardrails. Obviously the person who "adores God" but doesn't acknowledge Jesus as God is incomplete in theology and practice.

No, adore is a synonym for worship according to Denzinger. It doesn't matter if it's incomplete, because the position of NA is premised on natural theology. Rome teaches jews and muslims, being "monotheistic Abrahamic religions" worship God the Father of the OT. This is the communality NA is referring to.

If Orthodoxy appears to have nothing to offer but 3-year secluded catechesis, it's less likely to build bridges.

I don't know anyone who had 3 years of catechesis. Orthodox aren't expected to be theologians, but to know the basics of the faith and dogma. To know what they actually believe in when they enter the Church which is completely reasonable and necessary. You go build bridges with hindus, buddhists, muslims, JW, LDS, ecumenists - have a blast.

Missionaries who spend 3 years learning another person's culture have much more fruit.

What is the fruit exactly? Arriving to some ecumenist perenialist compromise that has nothing to do with the true Church and the faith of Christ? We're not freemasons. Don't give me that bs. Everyone participating in ecumenist efforts and dialogues (like the Rockefeller ran WCC) should be excommunicated. Jesus nukes bridges between His people and the heterodox, Satan is the one who brings people in false unity in his one world religion and beast system.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, what's your reading? I've heard popesplainers have a go on it and their mental gymnastics are hilarious. I don't think you can top them although you're pretty well versed in sophism and filibustering too.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you're right, you're right. Can't argue with this.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

I doubt you have red it then because it's pretty straightforward:

Thus in Hinduism, men contemplate the divine mystery and express it through an inexhaustible abundance of myths and through searching philosophical inquiry. They seek freedom from the anguish of our human condition either through ascetical practices or profound meditation or a flight to God with love and trust.

The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.

https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

It's over for trad caths. Rome is officially out of the game. It's not just Nostra Aetate too: there's Lumin Gentium, Gadium et spes, Fiducia Supplicans and countless other papal encyclicals, pronunciations and documents that reafirm those positions.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure. Stick to your skittles and socialism promoting ecumenist open-borders Pope then.

Barlaam's heretical teachings that Palamas argued against are one of the basis of the Vatican Nostra Aetate which states that Christians worship the same God as muslims and hindus and that jews shouldn't be converted btw.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

Narrative framing, cherry picking, creating false dialectics and appealing to emotion is not necessarily lying, but it's deception and manipulation.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Eastern Orthodox Church. It is the Church of the apostles that Christ established and which has kept the faith unchanged.

Catholicism is premised on the indefectibility and infallible teachings of the Pope. The whole system hinges on one person. The problem is not that the Church is infected with marxism, but that the Pope himself teaches marxism (that would be every Pope since Vatican II).

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't get me wrong - Bergoglio is a jesuit NWO goblin. But still it's a low effort post.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

The Vatican has been compromised by the CIA and the globalists since Vatican II. All Popes are curated by the cabal and are towing the same NWO agenda. Catholics need to wake up and leave this ridiculous cult.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not addressing anything, just trolling. You're cooked on both sides. I'm done with your bs.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

You want me to listen to an hour long speech by a "former jew" instead of you telling me in your own aryan words? You must respect jews very much. Do they have authority over you? Isn't Jesus a gentile - why do you need jews to tell you He's one of us?

You don't see how you contradict yourself with this idiotic post.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

He read from the Bible that Jesus wasn't jewish, even though both both Gospels of Mathew and Luke give a genealogy, tracing Him back to Jacob? And even though Jesus pretty much constantly refers back to the OT hebrew tradition, fulfills prophecies, worships in the Temple and the synagogue, underwent all the jewish sacraments, is born in Judea and His mother was jewish? What was He if not jewish?

Tell me you never red the Bible outside of quote mines without telling me.

What's the verse this perfidious jew uses that got you convinced in his lies?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›