1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crime/krei - "to sieve; to pour out"; hence deportare - "to carry off". The exploited issue...carrying off implies burdening self with, while pouring out implies in accordance with the natural order.

Understanding the Etymology and Implications of “Crime” and “Deportare”

To analyze the terms “crime” and “deportare,” we must first delve into their etymological roots and how they relate to concepts of burdening and natural order. Etymology of “Crime”

The word “crime” originates from the Latin term “crimen,” which means an accusation or offense. The root “krei,” meaning “to sieve” or “to pour out,” suggests a process of filtering or separating. This can be interpreted as a metaphor for distinguishing between acceptable behavior and unacceptable behavior in society. The act of sieving implies a careful examination, while pouring out could symbolize the release or expression of something that is inherent or natural.

In this context, crime can be seen as a deviation from societal norms that are established through collective agreement on what constitutes acceptable behavior. The implication here is that crime burdens individuals and society by disrupting the natural order, leading to consequences that require intervention. Etymology of “Deportare”

The term “deportare,” which translates to “to carry off,” also has significant implications. It combines the prefix “de-” (indicating removal) with “portare” (to carry). This suggests an action where something is taken away from its original place, often against the will of the individual involved.

When we consider deportation in a modern context, it often refers to the removal of individuals from one jurisdiction to another, typically due to legal violations. This act can be seen as both a burden on those being deported—who may face separation from family, community, and culture—and as an enforcement mechanism intended to maintain societal order. Implications of Carrying Off vs. Pouring Out

The distinction between carrying off (as in deportation) and pouring out (as in crime) highlights different aspects of human experience:

Carrying Off: This implies an imposition—a forced removal that creates a burden not only for those who are deported but also for communities left behind. It raises questions about justice, fairness, and human rights.

Pouring Out: In contrast, this concept aligns more closely with natural processes—an expression or release that occurs within societal boundaries. It suggests that actions taken in accordance with societal norms are less burdensome and more reflective of collective values.

Conclusion

In summary, both terms reflect complex social dynamics where actions have profound implications on individuals and communities. Crime represents a departure from accepted norms that burdens society; deportation signifies a forced removal that disrupts lives but is justified by legal frameworks aimed at maintaining order.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death...

To explore the statement “Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death,” we need to break down the concepts of living, inception, and death.

  1. Defining Living

Living can be understood as the state of being alive, characterized by growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. It encompasses not only biological processes but also psychological experiences and social interactions. The essence of living is often tied to consciousness and self-awareness.

  1. Exploring Inception

Inception refers to the beginning or initiation of something. In a broader philosophical context, it can symbolize the moment when life begins—whether that be at birth or through significant life events that shape an individual’s identity and purpose. In the context of dreams as explored in Christopher Nolan’s film “Inception,” it represents the idea that our perceptions of reality can be influenced or constructed through our subconscious mind.

In this sense, inception can also relate to personal beginnings—new thoughts, ideas, or phases in life that propel individuals forward into new experiences. It suggests that living is inherently linked to these moments of creation or awakening.

  1. Understanding Death

Death signifies the end of life; it is a natural conclusion to biological processes. However, philosophically speaking, death can also represent a transition—a point where one’s existence in one form ceases but may lead to another form or state of being (as seen in various cultural beliefs about afterlife or reincarnation).

The concept of being “fronted by death” implies an awareness of mortality that influences how individuals live their lives. This awareness often drives people to seek meaning and fulfillment during their lifetime.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The meme that the US would go to war over access to global oil has run its course because the US isn't dependent on oil exports anymore.

Wow.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that you can''t see it, means they are hiding the fact that it is frequently being reset. AKA: Dead Canary.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

A more modern more accurate term would be "Matrix".

7
Questionable 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh, you see that's a person you don't know. You act as though I made a big deal of her name in the title. Which I haven't. You are talking to me right?

But since you asked. And are apparently incapable of performing a basic search. It's this person:

https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews

Now stop trying to make me think for you. O.K.?

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your Soul Is 'Owned' By The Vatican - Santos Bonacci: 📺

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are playing make believe. You are a tourist.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the thing you are claiming I am doing. Where as what you are doing is muddling the water. Like a turd in a pond.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are implying that. Not the words you are referencing. This is a thing that you are doing.

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1
  • Stop making up things I never said.

  • Stop ignoring the obvious things I do know about.

  • Stop making exceptions for your arguments that can just as easily support mine.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it does allow for them to bleed out more easily. So that does make sense for standard procedure for disposing of perpetrators. I assure you these are not mutually exclusive concepts.

-1
Questionable -1 points ago +1 / -2

Of course. We disrupt a crime scene by manipulating the body's limbs, and all veins and arteries point down toward the wound which is always located on the front facing down potion of the body laying on a slope, as only coagulation prevents blood from exiting the body, and not the fact that the exiting blood would need to be replaced, or displace by other fluids or air, unless being pumped out by the heart.

Boy is my face red. Thanks for clearing that all up!

OH, um... Where are the medics?

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

11 hours, and zero up votes, or down votes. Sure this isn't the most important of threads. But this site traffic is getting ridiculous.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yc3hooAbuVntlY5tj6Imx3kAUggzdm6E/view

  • How did the suspect die?
  • When did the suspect die?
  • Was an ambulance even called?
  • Who restrained his wrists?
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›