Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death...
To explore the statement “Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death,” we need to break down the concepts of living, inception, and death.
Defining Living
Living can be understood as the state of being alive, characterized by growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. It encompasses not only biological processes but also psychological experiences and social interactions. The essence of living is often tied to consciousness and self-awareness.
Exploring Inception
Inception refers to the beginning or initiation of something. In a broader philosophical context, it can symbolize the moment when life begins—whether that be at birth or through significant life events that shape an individual’s identity and purpose. In the context of dreams as explored in Christopher Nolan’s film “Inception,” it represents the idea that our perceptions of reality can be influenced or constructed through our subconscious mind.
In this sense, inception can also relate to personal beginnings—new thoughts, ideas, or phases in life that propel individuals forward into new experiences. It suggests that living is inherently linked to these moments of creation or awakening.
Understanding Death
Death signifies the end of life; it is a natural conclusion to biological processes. However, philosophically speaking, death can also represent a transition—a point where one’s existence in one form ceases but may lead to another form or state of being (as seen in various cultural beliefs about afterlife or reincarnation).
The concept of being “fronted by death” implies an awareness of mortality that influences how individuals live their lives. This awareness often drives people to seek meaning and fulfillment during their lifetime.
Alive implies free (choice) and partial, hence partially living within whole process of dying.
b) To define implies to affix something, while living implies temporary matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of ongoing motion.
c) Few suggest definition-ism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitionism to tempt many to hold onto (consent) fiction (suggested) while ignoring that reality (perceivable) moves.
To explore the statement
EX (out of) PLUERE (flow), hence ex (life) pluere (inception towards death). Also; each ones state of mind (statement) within all is differentiated from one another...until many consent to hold onto suggestions by few, which equalizes differences.
being alive, characterized by...AND continual change preceding death
What if this continual change implies the ongoing process of dying as the origin of each temporary life within? AND implies an addition to, instead of the origin thereof...could that corrupt ones perspective?
social interactions
Interaction implies being reacting internally within action, and requires a setting apart of being to be able to react differently to the same action...few suggest social-ism to tempt many together, while ignoring to be a part within whole and apart from one another.
essence of living is often tied
Coming into being (essence) implies a setting apart (off-spring) aka a setting free (will of choice)...few suggest religion (Latin relgio; to bind anew) to tie the knot around many.
Inception refers to the beginning or initiation of something
Inception to life to death also implies matter within momentum of motion, hence essence coming in and out of origin.
In a broader philosophical context
a) Context contradicts broad aka con (together, with) texere (to weave)...few suggest context to weave narratives for many to bind themselves to.
b) Phi-LO-sophical implies LOgic aka a conflict of reason; confining one within two sides, while ignoring that being choice within balance implies free-dom, hence being set free (life) during dominance (inception towards death) aka free to live ones life, while dying.
it can symbolize the moment when life begins
Few suggest symbolism to tempt many to hold onto it, while ignoring that such a captured moment (symbolized by a picture taken)...implies an ongoing MOMENTum of motion.
shape an individual’s identity and purpose
a) Individual implies "within two", which contradicts being one (partial) within oneness (whole)...there can be only one. Few suggest dual-ism to tempt one to ignore self for another ones suggestion.
b) Identity/identic implies the same...being implies differentiated by one another within the same all. Few suggest Identitarianism/idealism to equalize differences among many aka hammering down the largest nail etc.
c) Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to seek purpose in outcome, while ignoring duty (resistance) during origin (velocity), hence the path of least resistance implying ones temptation to ignore resisting, while following suggested purposes towards DEATH.
inception can also relate to personal beginnings
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies ones inception as instrument within sound. Sound was before any instrument can begin to use it...
the idea that our perceptions of reality can be influenced...It suggests that living is inherently linked
Aka suggesting a linked life to influence ones perception to ignore a flowing reality; setting forms apart from one another within.
a) Logic (conflict) contradicts bio (life)...hence life reasoning against other life aka "war".
b) There can be only only process...action aka motion. Only within motion can there be initiation (inception) and conclusion (death) of essence (life).
death can also represent a transition
Living within process of dying implies a trans-form-ation of essence within origin, hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); and form to flow (death).
an awareness of mortality that influences
That in-fluence implies formed mortal life within flowing process of dying. Aware/wer - "to perceive" is what few tempt many to ignore by influencing with suggested information.
This awareness often drives people to seek
Nature drives life towards death; hence inspiring resistance during temptation...seeking implies being tempted by outcomes to ignore the origin driving the living vessels forwards.
fulfillment
Ones mind/memory needs to process flowing inspiration, while resisting the temptation to fulfill with wanted information...few suggest information to tempt many to ignore inspiration aka holding onto inwardly, while ignoring outwardly awareness.
...to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the temptation of...
bot spam
...suggested information.
Labeling anything as "bot spam" affixes ones perspective onto the artificial label...nature moves; which inspires perspective to draw from change aka to adapt.
When I thank another for inspiration, then that isn't about how much (writing it) or less (copy and pasting it) labor others put into something, put simply for being a mediator (suggestion) within origin (perception)...which inspires me to labor.
To explore the statement “Living implies being backed by inception and fronted by death,” we need to break down the concepts of living, inception, and death.
Living can be understood as the state of being alive, characterized by growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. It encompasses not only biological processes but also psychological experiences and social interactions. The essence of living is often tied to consciousness and self-awareness.
Inception refers to the beginning or initiation of something. In a broader philosophical context, it can symbolize the moment when life begins—whether that be at birth or through significant life events that shape an individual’s identity and purpose. In the context of dreams as explored in Christopher Nolan’s film “Inception,” it represents the idea that our perceptions of reality can be influenced or constructed through our subconscious mind.
In this sense, inception can also relate to personal beginnings—new thoughts, ideas, or phases in life that propel individuals forward into new experiences. It suggests that living is inherently linked to these moments of creation or awakening.
Death signifies the end of life; it is a natural conclusion to biological processes. However, philosophically speaking, death can also represent a transition—a point where one’s existence in one form ceases but may lead to another form or state of being (as seen in various cultural beliefs about afterlife or reincarnation).
The concept of being “fronted by death” implies an awareness of mortality that influences how individuals live their lives. This awareness often drives people to seek meaning and fulfillment during their lifetime.
a) DE (completely) + FINERE (to bound, limit)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/define#etymonline_v_914
Alive implies free (choice) and partial, hence partially living within whole process of dying.
b) To define implies to affix something, while living implies temporary matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of ongoing motion.
c) Few suggest definition-ism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitionism to tempt many to hold onto (consent) fiction (suggested) while ignoring that reality (perceivable) moves.
EX (out of) PLUERE (flow), hence ex (life) pluere (inception towards death). Also; each ones state of mind (statement) within all is differentiated from one another...until many consent to hold onto suggestions by few, which equalizes differences.
What if this continual change implies the ongoing process of dying as the origin of each temporary life within? AND implies an addition to, instead of the origin thereof...could that corrupt ones perspective?
Interaction implies being reacting internally within action, and requires a setting apart of being to be able to react differently to the same action...few suggest social-ism to tempt many together, while ignoring to be a part within whole and apart from one another.
Coming into being (essence) implies a setting apart (off-spring) aka a setting free (will of choice)...few suggest religion (Latin relgio; to bind anew) to tie the knot around many.
Inception to life to death also implies matter within momentum of motion, hence essence coming in and out of origin.
a) Context contradicts broad aka con (together, with) texere (to weave)...few suggest context to weave narratives for many to bind themselves to.
b) Phi-LO-sophical implies LOgic aka a conflict of reason; confining one within two sides, while ignoring that being choice within balance implies free-dom, hence being set free (life) during dominance (inception towards death) aka free to live ones life, while dying.
Few suggest symbolism to tempt many to hold onto it, while ignoring that such a captured moment (symbolized by a picture taken)...implies an ongoing MOMENTum of motion.
a) Individual implies "within two", which contradicts being one (partial) within oneness (whole)...there can be only one. Few suggest dual-ism to tempt one to ignore self for another ones suggestion.
b) Identity/identic implies the same...being implies differentiated by one another within the same all. Few suggest Identitarianism/idealism to equalize differences among many aka hammering down the largest nail etc.
c) Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to seek purpose in outcome, while ignoring duty (resistance) during origin (velocity), hence the path of least resistance implying ones temptation to ignore resisting, while following suggested purposes towards DEATH.
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies ones inception as instrument within sound. Sound was before any instrument can begin to use it...
Aka suggesting a linked life to influence ones perception to ignore a flowing reality; setting forms apart from one another within.
Sign/sekw - "to follow"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/sign Really? How does reality signify life to follow towards death?
a) Logic (conflict) contradicts bio (life)...hence life reasoning against other life aka "war".
b) There can be only only process...action aka motion. Only within motion can there be initiation (inception) and conclusion (death) of essence (life).
Living within process of dying implies a trans-form-ation of essence within origin, hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); and form to flow (death).
That in-fluence implies formed mortal life within flowing process of dying. Aware/wer - "to perceive" is what few tempt many to ignore by influencing with suggested information.
Nature drives life towards death; hence inspiring resistance during temptation...seeking implies being tempted by outcomes to ignore the origin driving the living vessels forwards.
Ones mind/memory needs to process flowing inspiration, while resisting the temptation to fulfill with wanted information...few suggest information to tempt many to ignore inspiration aka holding onto inwardly, while ignoring outwardly awareness.
tl; dr...great post. Thanks for the inspiration.
You just replied to bot spam.
...to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the temptation of...
...suggested information.
Labeling anything as "bot spam" affixes ones perspective onto the artificial label...nature moves; which inspires perspective to draw from change aka to adapt.
When I thank another for inspiration, then that isn't about how much (writing it) or less (copy and pasting it) labor others put into something, put simply for being a mediator (suggestion) within origin (perception)...which inspires me to labor.
It is clear that destroying discourse is your main objective.