[comical retort entered here] </style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="content_1">
<h1>Headline News 1</h1>
<h2>Monkeys Paw</h2>
</div>
That's the spirit. Well... Kind of. Shouldn't you actually start Questioning my motives at that time? And going over my comments with a fine tipped comb?
In the 70's they would have had a news chopper, showing us what was going on. I was able to obtain no more information from this news piece, as I was from the title. Miserable.
It's their channel. The video starts mid report? Doesn't detail what any of it is about. Why?
The protests are part of a planned “economic blockade” coordinated with similar protests around the world. An additional protest is planed for noon at UN Plaza and Market and Hyde streets in San Francisco, by the Group Code Pink. Another action by the A15 group is planned at the Tesla Factory in Fremont.
That's all we get people. That and shots of nobody doing nothing.
Is this even an actual event? Or are they just claiming it to be happening? I can't tell.
You should go watch "A Clockwork Orange", and then we can have a long in depth conversation on the preparation of various lentil soups.
Or to say: I cannot parse, how any of the information you are spewing out onto the page is related to each other.
I would ask you to make this make sense. But, I am uncertain that you can.
Often times, that phrase is used to make you believe something without evidence. See what you have done there? You've assumed something to be 'plainly obvious' whenever you hear the phrase used.
In this case, a term is being repeated to control the narrative, and act as a stop gap, so that he doesn't veer off topic, and discuss crimes such as child trafficking. This is what controlled opposition looks like. As these are the talking points allowed to enter into the public Zeitgeist at this time.
He likes saying the phrase "carry the day" and proclaiming water to be wet.
Gaslighting at it's finest. There are just too many layers to this, I can't bereave that she is speaking in good faith, or that she even believes her own words.
So, this video is basically a bunch of retards casually discussing how they are going to irradiate us?
I was going to post a reaction video, but then I got distracted, As I don't care.
You understand that this forum format is actually a content aggregator site. If you have seen something, it helps to link to it, so that others may view it as well.
Are you the one reporting this. Are you seeing these things? Are the light orbs and demons with you now in the room?
I literally admitted that I got it wrong in the last reply. What are you retarded or something?
Agh yes, the 2nd amendment protects the 1st amendment. Providing you the right to call me a retard, and for me to call you a gaping leaky asshole.
Well that's some good follow through on tracking this information.
OK. What does that have to do with this poor woman having her 2nd Amendment rights being infringed? This woman is having her gun rights restricted!
I'll take your word at face value, and assume that you are correct in some way. Yes you are correct. Trump did not rape her.
Auto mod doesn't like your link. Check mod logs. I saw a big swath of autos taking place this morning. Though the fact that I am seeing it, tells me that someone OK'ed it.
"17 hours ago clemaneuverers approved a comment by SupremeTeamQ - Conspiracies dot win is banning this from being posted. I guess they work for Obama Bin Biden and Billary Bush as well: https://qboro.substack.com/p/proof-that-obama-hillary-clinton"
I also hear that you can shine your shoes with shit. Yet I prefer to use Shinola. As there is a difference, And I know what is, and is not an illusion.
Stable coins aren't crypto. They are controlled by private entities, they are pinned to fiat, and they can create them out of this air, just like fiat.
Much more descriptive with better theories. Yet, I've always found his video intro to be juvenile, and hard to get past.
I'm just trying to suss out, how that you are eating a live cow, without this conversation becoming even more awkward.
Yes. It certainly is 'much wise'. Now we are just left wondering in what way it failed.
You think you can sus out whether I'm a real person or not by injecting random assertion into reply? Cool!