"Voter intimidation" six months after the ballots were cast, and 'racist', when the only thing being Questioned are white pieces of paper.
I wonder if words will ever hold meaning again.
Define 'wrong'.
Speaking of counter intuitive things. This is just a thread of random thoughts, is it not?
This is actually some interesting stuff. Would be nice if the author mused less, and detailed his facts more thoroughly in his later videos.
Medium and light roast coffees contain more caffeine than dark roast coffee.
A manager will speak with you shortly.
Better late than never.
You posted an image of someplace. You didn't even tell us where it came from in the title. And now we are to assume, someone, someplace, is a child rapist because you said so.
Stop IT.
You quoted and addressed 2 words out of 47, and failed to answer the Questions, and one of those words is quoted incorrectly.
Having quoted me, you then go on to utilize a series of single sentence paragraphs, that are only tangentially linked to those two words. Let us now go over those paragraphs shall we?
How many businesses are closed due to hoax conditions?
What was the topic again? Rape?
How many more suicides?
Suicide by rape?
How many more put into poverty?
Raped into poverty?
Don't worry, ayh will seek to preserve your use of rape as sexual penetration only and think.. they didn't.
there is so much to unpack here, and yet, I can't make heads or tails of any of it. Should I address the grammatical errors, or just the lack of context?
"OH WAIT.. butt they did. Remember China using anal kits for COVID tests?"
Oh right. butt rape. Now were are getting someplace. Speaking of which. The word you were looking for there was "but" and not "Butt". Man you have a one track mind when it comes to butts. Everything seems to center around butts and toilets. I would post some links here, but I think you know your own post history well enough by now.
"Is that rape if the whole thing is a hoax?"
Maybe. But the topic was not anal swabs, and China was not responsible for your thread's title. Which was what I was addressing. A title where you posted up imagery of anal trauma from non-consensual sex, which contributed to the low interest in your summited thread. And for your information, only commies travel to China. Now you're not a commie are you?
In the interest of informing the community, I took it upon myself to post up your link with a new title. Feel free to thank me.
Better late than never.
It is a forensic audit.
In general, titles that invoke images of torn open rape anuses, don't garner too much respect, especially when the topic is not rape. Nor are threats of violence over the internet meet with acceptance. What exactly did you expect to happen here? Blind compliance and up votes?
Better late than never.
Take 3D10 Damage, and an additional 5 points fire damage.
If he is truly loyal to Judaism, then there can be no duel loyalty.
As for the validity of his statement, every word he has utilized, has been issued in bad faith, and in a deceptive manner. He has done so intentionally. He hides behind his religion and his faith as a coward. The only thing he understands how to do is deceive and use those around him for his own self enrichment.
"Unrepentant" is truly the best way to describe this man.
Nothing is ever so black and white.
Roll a perception check against a target of 5.
-1. To this self affirming nonsense.
Oh... I mean.. I'm a tier 9 magikarp. I pre-exist the concept of water, and am a duel type with psychic abilities or... Whatever. Do you want to look through my glossies and foils for rares?
Take 2D10 Damage.
What a friendly euphemism the word 'Questionable' can be. Really strange that this is the first we are hearing about it now. What could the word 'Questionable' be a genteelism for? A thesaurus helped me to finish this text. But I doubt that any thesaurus can bridge the massive gap between what has been said, and his actual actions. . .
"8 years of solid irrefutable experience would beg to differ."
You should Question your own fucking arrogance. Because you are useless outside of a free fire zone.
And you clearly didn't watch the video of the shooting. Talking about experience. She had 2 cops on her six, there were no verbal warnings.
I don't mince my words with the likes of you. You are incapable of making decisions, and are incapable of handling a firearm.
" Ayh would have shot her too"
You shouldn't own a gun then. You are a buffoon.
It's because they would simply refuse to kill the lower tear animals.
As for those top five, anyone who thinks they can fight one of those is delusional.
Only one man in history has ever been known to win in a fight versus a bear.
This poll is meaningless.
You want negative news about him. Turn on your television. You want positive news about him, head over to https://patriots.win/
K.
https://patriots.win/p/12ighX44TF/x/c/4E0xzoFX8Zp