In general, titles that invoke images of torn open rape anuses, don't garner too much respect, especially when the topic is not rape. Nor are threats of violence over the internet meet with acceptance. What exactly did you expect to happen here? Blind compliance and up votes?
You quoted and addressed 2 words out of 47, and failed to answer the Questions, and one of those words is quoted incorrectly.
Having quoted me, you then go on to utilize a series of single sentence paragraphs, that are only tangentially linked to those two words. Let us now go over those paragraphs shall we?
How many businesses are closed due to hoax conditions?
What was the topic again? Rape?
How many more suicides?
Suicide by rape?
How many more put into poverty?
Raped into poverty?
Don't worry, ayh will seek to preserve your use of rape as sexual penetration only and think.. they didn't.
there is so much to unpack here, and yet, I can't make heads or tails of any of it. Should I address the grammatical errors, or just the lack of context?
"OH WAIT.. butt they did. Remember China using anal kits for COVID tests?"
Oh right. butt rape. Now were are getting someplace. Speaking of which. The word you were looking for there was "but" and not "Butt". Man you have a one track mind when it comes to butts. Everything seems to center around butts and toilets. I would post some links here, but I think you know your own post history well enough by now.
"Is that rape if the whole thing is a hoax?"
Maybe. But the topic was not anal swabs, and China was not responsible for your thread's title. Which was what I was addressing. A title where you posted up imagery of anal trauma from non-consensual sex, which contributed to the low interest in your summited thread. And for your information, only commies travel to China. Now you're not a commie are you?
Better late than never.
In general, titles that invoke images of torn open rape anuses, don't garner too much respect, especially when the topic is not rape. Nor are threats of violence over the internet meet with acceptance. What exactly did you expect to happen here? Blind compliance and up votes?
.
You quoted and addressed 2 words out of 47, and failed to answer the Questions, and one of those words is quoted incorrectly.
Having quoted me, you then go on to utilize a series of single sentence paragraphs, that are only tangentially linked to those two words. Let us now go over those paragraphs shall we?
What was the topic again? Rape?
Suicide by rape?
Raped into poverty?
there is so much to unpack here, and yet, I can't make heads or tails of any of it. Should I address the grammatical errors, or just the lack of context?
Oh right. butt rape. Now were are getting someplace. Speaking of which. The word you were looking for there was "but" and not "Butt". Man you have a one track mind when it comes to butts. Everything seems to center around butts and toilets. I would post some links here, but I think you know your own post history well enough by now.
Maybe. But the topic was not anal swabs, and China was not responsible for your thread's title. Which was what I was addressing. A title where you posted up imagery of anal trauma from non-consensual sex, which contributed to the low interest in your summited thread. And for your information, only commies travel to China. Now you're not a commie are you?
In the interest of informing the community, I took it upon myself to post up your link with a new title. Feel free to thank me.
BETTER LATE, THAN NEVER.