1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

My first crazy thought upon hearing about it was that it was a Russian air strike.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's literally what the green energy is for. To make money off of the suffering of others while lying about the cause and facts of climate.

Look, it's clear that you have crafted an emotional statement without meaning. You're stamens appeals to morons, and are designed to push the green new deal. Or at least I must assume so, because if not, you are the cretin the world oligarchs wish to create, and rule over.

To live in a world of morons. What idiot would wish for a fate so sad?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

That wasn't my standard of evidence. That was my assessment of you, and your base contrarian, mentality. How could you even mistake that as evidence? Why do you assume to speak for 'we'? Why didn't you provide any evidence of your own from the links provided? Why do you trust WEF data, but not cross compiled WEF data from outside of their control? Why didn't you do any research of your own to prop up your contrarian argument?

Doesn't matter I suppose. Though you should do better in the future than begging and waiting on me to provide you all the information you use in a argument. As it really ends up weakening anything you have to say.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Their leaders are under WEF control.

And that's all we need to know to understand that the article you posted is based on bullshit. Thanks.

And that's all that I needed to read, to know that you are a dickless idiot. Thanks!

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://worldeconomics.com/ESG/Social/Ghana.aspx

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/correction-fitch-downgrades-ghana-to-b-outlook-negative-21-01-2022

https://worldeconomics.com/ESG/Environment/Sri%20Lanka.aspx

https://esgclarity.com/which-country-does-esg-best/

Sorry, they really don't make this info, very transparent. And I think I lost a few links after my last search. Plus, he may be relying on information that is not currently publicly disclosed for the year 2022.

https://nitter.net/realmichaelseif/status/1547999515818356737

It's also important to note that ESG scores by country are not 'official' and generated by third parties, as the WEF only generates ESG score for companies.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sir Lanka and Netherlands are verifiable. Ghana was downgraded at the beginning of the year, and gets high marks in 'social progress'.

by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's like they are punishing AMD for succeeding.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

They have a higher average, true. But, overall they posses less potential. Either way, a high IQ does not equate to good moral standards, and mid to high IQ's can be manipulated into working against their own best interest, and the interest of humanity as a whole.

Though not accurate by a clinical definition, this is what used to be known as a 'useful idiot', or in the modern vernacular a "midwit".

by qbqb
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

This submission contains no information. Submitter is a troll.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never said I believed germ theory is correct (it's not)

OK. Why didn't you just say that in the first place, instead of throwing shade on the whole thing? Whatever.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

What an amazing take down of yourself. You managed to judge a 75 minute video based on 10 seconds of audio just after the the intro finished playing. And to top if off. It's not even the real spacebusters video which clocks in at 155 minutes:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ch8v4TVL9yq0/

Here's the crux of your ignorance. Had you made it 5 seconds longer, you would have heard him state that the theory has been disproven.

In fact, you don't even know the difference between fact and theory, and have assumed, that everything remains a theory without further classifications taking precedence:

The main difference between fact and theory is that fact is usually thought of as a described state of affairs in which the descriptions are true and highly supported. A theory, on the other hand, is a logically connected set of hypothesis and facts which carefully explains observations of the natural world that have been constructed using a scientific method.

What is a Fact? A fact is any phenomenon or action that is verified. In other words, what you can verify or prove is called a fact. Newton observed the action of an apple falling from the tree. You and I observe a ball that is thrown up in the air returns to you. These are facts, the observable actions or happenings, thus can be verified. It is very important to know that facts remain facts even after several centuries. There is universal truth behind a fact.

Now it is true, that a fact still remains a theory once it is proven. But guess what? This theory has never been proven a fact. Which leads us back to the statement you took issue with, which was 100% accurate. Germ theory has never been proven a fact. Which is why it is called a theory, and not a fact, or scientific law.

You're ignorance is palpable sir.

by pkvi
2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.wallstreetzen.com/stocks/us/nasdaq/tsla/ownership

Elon Musk 15.79% 163,583,337 $115.00B Insider

8
Questionable 8 points ago +8 / -0

Submission Statement: In this video, Putin claims, "This process is already impossible to stop"

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm using logic. What exactly is the pattern you see? Traditional dairy products in a list?

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

But what is he talking about?

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Submission Statement: What does he mean by "only way to survive"?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yogurt, sour cream, butter, cream cheese, cheeses, butter milk, whey protean, cheep cheese powders. There is literally no reason to use it for ice cream, when the majority of the dairy products are literal rot.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes but no. Your gut is full of bacteria. We are omnivores and highly capable of taking in carrion and fermented foods.

That being said, even slightly old peanuts have a bad taste too them, and there is no reason to put those in snickers. Now cheap peanut butter filling on the other hand, for off brand Halloween candy? You can cover up that flavor with sugar. And it's a once a year expenditure.

by qbqb
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You want the answer to that Question. Sorry.

by qbqb
1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you really read what he is saying. He isn't making any claims at all. It's all baseless and disconnected. It's mere word association, creative writing, and vague self contained statements.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›