"Unexplained" heart failure is a bit more common than people would like to admit.
Funny how they deny owning any labs, but don't deny funding research. Oh well.
Well, shit... continue the shitposting!
Hahaha. It's terrible, but I can agree with this.
And in a month she'll be hired on by another mainstream network that mirrors CBC.
They seem like random doodles some guy made up in an attempt to become an authority on the matter.
The left was convinced they were arming themselves with yet another virtue signaling / pseudo-morality weapon.
Who knew that the carrot dangled in front of them would be the same carrot jammed up their asses?
The pink elephant in the room? The PINK ELEPHANT in the ROOM!?
Well I sure hope he's been vaccinated!
Manufactured Terror, brought to you in part by Main Stream News and Viewers Like You.
Terrified? No.
Every epidemic / pandemic in the last few years involves some sort of fear mongering and a vaccine. Swine Flu / H1N1(?) is a good example, with plenty of info on the propaganda and push.
It's called recognizing simple patterns.
That's what I thought =]
Except the Catholic Church and their "vicar of Christ," the pope, are just as evil as one might view the NWO.
"But I'm still happy I got the jab!!" -paid shills.
Jesus Christ is the lamb slain before the foundation of the world. He is the son of God and yet God in the flesh. He was crucified, buried, but rose again the 3rd day.
"For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
...why would I want to filter movies by race? LOL.
I can't help but laugh when I read "Emergency Temporary Standard."
Temporary... Yeah, because everything regarding this scamdemic suggests temporary.
Centralized platforms = control.
Reddit has been a joke for a long time now.
Hundreds of death threats huh?
Search engine results are now no different than targeted advertisements. It's disgusting.
Are you a social media simpleton that rhetorically quotes meaningless tweets - oblivious to this common trend and its obvious association with misinformation?
I'm simply addressing you in the same form as you did with a previous poster. You challenged them for proof and at best you provide a tweet in a smug manner. Well, congratu-fucking-lations...you can read twitter.
You even acknowledge your only proof is a tweet.
Sure thing, bot.
If a tweet is the extent of your proof, all I can do is laugh.
So... someone objects to your post and you in turn make a rage baby post?