Consider the option that you will be able to remove a mod if you can prove their actions are unjust.
And who is this "stormfaggot"?
Also, I doubt someone will remove anything but his topic, as a mod... If you really vote for such a person, then that's on you...
It's a community effort, friend. If you want a change - you offer it. But in your 44 days I bet you haven't seen the usual shills that are allowed to exist here because we don't have a mod... So I see your point, but I don't agree.
So you didn't provide them. Refer to this comment - https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARK0RBtIZ/x/c/4eXu1K4JiPC
You said, and I quote: "I count 52 groups in this graphic."
And you said yourself that you can get them to a 100... Yet, you didn't.
It's fun to pull this fake Christian forum that is with the name c/Christianity. I was there. They never offered any community prayer, nothing about actual help in reaching Christ, just quotes from the Bible, so they can feel superior. That's why I made my own place called True Christianity.
Actually, I should mention that their fault was that they don't consider jews as bad even if they spit on Christians... And if Jesus called these jews - the synagogue of satan, how much truth do you expect to find in c/Christianity?
Anyway, I just wanted this to be known because c/Christianity is as christian as the devil himself.
Still, I haven't heard of 100 denominations of the other religions still. You can post when ready.
Incidentally, when I ban or downvote, I'm pretty good at being unemotional about it, with no relation to "not taking it" about a debate.
Incorrect. I caught you in a lie and you never said - true, I never mentioned 100.
If disproven, I take it.
It was disproven, you didn't take it.
Thou hypocrite...
If I believe I'm not disproven, I patiently explain why (or sometimes let a time-waster believe he's won if my conscience before third parties is clear).
The arrogance in this sentence... :D I'll just let that speak for itself...
God bless you, in Jesus's name.
You never knew God... You don't know what you say... Even the devil can quote the Bible...
What did Jesus say?
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Matthew 7.
You use Christianity as a shield... But you're not a Christian.
You're a hypocrite.
Remind me what the Bible states about hypocrites, please...
PS: Download the video to your device and play it form there, it's not about the eyes, and there are many videos like that, I don't think it's a technical glitch at all
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... dude, finally a solution!!! Thank you very much! It works! I don't understand how I never tried this before but I thank you so much!!!
Now I see it - the texture on their faces, but you can see that's not real. Since they move their eyebrows and the texture follows that.
So, you put forth a lot of good points, so I will go one by one:
First, dinosaurs existed way before mamals, a self-aware reptilian race developped here on this earth is not far fetched
Actually, evolution is easily disproven - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d1Y6PUEmc4 (This is not a joke documentary, give it a try)
Two, if they existed for millions of years then it implies that they are so advanced in everything, including war techniques, but we still exist! that means they did not want to exterminate us for some reason, what could it be? are we a live-stock to them? do they need us for something? is someone preventing them from doing that? we have multiple probabilties here
True, if your first point is correct. However, you can see the documentary and prove that it isn't.
Take T-rex for example. That's an example for a big lizard with tiny arms... However, if T-rex had wings, and we know from bats that their wings are like elongated fingers covered with skin, and we know that those long fingers would be the first to rot, as they are very slim... Wouldn't you consider T-rex to be winged dragon? And their fingers ended with nails, so that's what survives after they are gone.
Would you consider that? Is there any chance that evolution theory is a joke made by a mason - Charles Darwin, who married his sister and mostly all of his children died? Perhaps we shouldn't jump on his conclusion is what I'm saying...
Please view the documentary.
Another note: it's very interesting that in the movie "They Live" reptilians lost their shield/hologram or whatever is that after destroying the broadcasting towers
That could be possessed people as well tho.
Electromagnetic waves can be used in a lot more than just wifi or televsion and other typical applications, one example that you could make at your own home is the V2K technology, you can literally make someone hear a voice just by a wave, i.e: a phone tower! a satellite.. and this is proven and public domain knowledge not classified or sci-fi tech
Well, the links you shared are very interesting. I'm not sure how I go by this, I always thought that you need a receiver inside the brain of the person... I guess I need to investigate that more...
Electromagnetic waves interact with the brain directly, remember, the body is an electrical machine, and with the right signals you can make someone hear, see, or even think! whatever you want!
I see your point, but I can't figure out how this can be done so easily without a receiver near the nerves of the brain... Probably I need more information there, but I don't exclude your point, even if I don't currently believe it. But I need proof of that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlu0KU-YERg - case of possession.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ovZC_aXQlY - Demons Masquerading As Dead Relatives
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5hIfoZwavw - Demon Magicians Exposed
Those are long materials consider the other link about evolution too. Leave the "case of possession" for last, but that's a good case... I couldn't find the other ones right now. The documentaries are very much worth your time.
Please take the time to view them and we can discuss this forward. Give them a chance for at least 10 minutes before you quit them, otherwise, I don't see how we can discuss them.. (I'm saying this because most users will hate me before even checking those documentaries... Just looking to explain my case with proofs in documentaries, but if they are not seen, then we are not talking on the same subject afterwards... It happens to me a lot. And I hope you know how much documentaries are worth... Isn't that why you shared your video?)
I try to understand that EM waves going directly to the inner ear without a receiver, but it's not clear to me from this link - https://patents.google.com/patent/US6470214B1
Can you help me out?
Sorry, for whatever reason I cannot play these videos (whenever there's a play button like that...) So I can't be sure of what you're posting...
However...
-
I investigated the topic and most of the videos are just frame issues. If someone moves their eye too fast, you might see both frames at one time, and that's incorrectly suggesting that there's something wrong with these people.
-
If reptilians really existed, they would've won the Earth through sheer force. But they don't. Because they are not real.
-
The evil ones are possessed by demons, you can show clear signs of possession, but they don't have reptilian eyes...
Do you want me to share with you videos on possession, so you can see that too?
Peter Thiel is the founder of Palantir along with 4 jews - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies
JD Vance... https://www.timesofisrael.com/meet-jd-vances-jewish-chief-of-staff-jacob-reses/ (Meet JD Vance’s Jewish chief of staff, Jacob Reses)
Hard to tell...
Your questions are now boring me so I won't give more examples.
Moderation material right there... /s
I offered you peace, the offer stands indefinitely, if you don't want it you don't want it.
Again with playing the victim... So overplayed...
I asked you questions -> you can't answer them. Then you can't accept a defeat. That's your own fault, not mine.
Because it shows the full range of your personality in your interactions with me, very convenient.
Likewise, pal. You proved your worth with that comment, and I thank you for that!
You're not a mod material, however.
We math students do have a range to our personalities, people forget.
Please don't... I never saw you on the international competitions that I won. So... please... don't... My dear, "math student"...
Being asked for 100 Jewish and 100 Muslim denominations on a dare, providing them all immediately, and then being told I didn't provide them,
You clearly didn't provide 100.
And YOU SAID THAT YOU CAN PROVIDE 100. That's YOUR DARE, not mine...
Also, it's possible to list 100 sects of Judaism or of Islam, but I don't find it worth my interest to go beyond a few main divisions. - https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARK0RBtIZ/x/c/4eXtiZLueOL
Your claim. Not mine.
I just challenged you on that... And the results:
"I count 52 groups in this graphic."
Not a hundred as you said?
Shame... - https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARK0RBtIZ/x/c/4eXu1K5SNuT
You made the dare. >>>> You lost it.
Be a grown person and take the defeat.
Being asked for 100 Jewish and 100 Muslim denominations on a dare, providing them all immediately
You lied, thou hypocrite.
Did you provide them?
Nope.
How does it feel to lose against your own comments? Is it boring? Oh, well...
See you next time when I demolish you with your own comments again until you learn to tell the truth, or at least show some humility when you lose your own daring argument.
You shouldn't be a mod.
Every time when you lose an argument, and you'll lose them a lot, you'll just ban people who disagree with you...
That's why you downvoted me, because you couldn't take it when someone disproves you...
I debunk Lightbringerflex's posts that proclaim unBiblical beliefs as facts.
That's not bad at all. Actually, quite commendable to fight the good fight.
Can you, however, show me your best examples, or example, on how you do that? If it's not a problem for you, I just want to see what kind of mod and am I voting for here.
Besides, what even is there to do? All that has been explored has been explored, right?
Pretty much, yes. But there are some recent news that needs unpacking. + I doubt that everyone knows the most important news that happen right now. Even I recently (3-4 years ago) found out about graphene as nanotech used in vaccines... It's important, and since you're a Christian, did you know this news was shared on page 666 of OpenChemistry journal? (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8248920/ - you need to open the .pdf)
All that's left to do is accuse people of being SALEM WITCHES, like how someone here claimed Kirk was a S.W.
That's absurd for someone to claim that... But clearly it's a troll or shill... Another good reason why we need good moderation in here.
3x triggered + 2x projecting + 1x dumbass...
Nice communication skills there.
When you can't directly reply, I'll ask you 5 times if necessary. It's fun.
Ok, go ahead and explain your Mandela effect... How can you prove something so drastic from a children's book?
Let's see that "willingness to help" of yours...
Pick a rule (0)-(9) that you think Will broke, thanks.
You're defending a AI chatbot that never showed any contribution.
I don't like you. You bring the downfall of this community, while everyone else has blocked this bot...
Here's your rule: A mod should remove people, who never contribute in a positive way. And if the mod has less IQ than an AI chatbot, then he surely shouldn't be a mod.
You mean...
Yes.
he's a challenge to my thoughts
Then your thoughts aren't that deep, if an AI chatbot that hasn't posted in over 4 years, and literally never in his existence is "challgenging your thoughts"...
Perhaps you don't have as deep thoughts as you think. A simple etymology chatbot can make you wonder, I don't think you can recognize a bot from a shill as a mod... Why would I vote for you? What do you have to offer to this community, who blocked an AI chatbot already?
I like you, so I'm convinced you didn't think about how that sounds in this forum.
You think I care?
You should really review my previous posts and comment to write that. I don't care if anyone likes me. I care ONLY for the truth.
And you like an AI chatbot, so your liking doesn't really mean anything, does it?
Since our good friend u/Paleo noticed our reports about spam, he banned u/persianprince sitewide within minutes of my giving him the details, because that is a known issue (demonstrable alt of CSAM poster). So I can use force. That's one of several issues I alluded to indirectly in the previous. However, most other people here know how to avoid becoming known issues, and that takes more subtlety. Consensus-building is a good way to work that, especially with several fronts to deal with.
How is this answering my point?
Again, you lean on someone else...
You can use force? And what force would you use against your AI friend - free_will_of_choice?
None?
Mods shouldn't have a friendly approach. Mods should be law enforcement. I don't believe you can do that. You say things only to be popular or be someone... That's not a mod, that's a tiny user activity.
We need order and direction in this forum. You don't provide that.
We need firm actions based on facts, not a user who likes an AI chatbot that has been blocked by most users...
We need simple and clear communication, not the SAT diarrhea that you spew...
You can try to convince yourself that you're smart, but that's not the goal here. The goal is helping the community, and you clearly miss it.
I wanted to be a mod, but one user in here reminded me that my actions are only recent, and my previous ones are not worthy to be a mod. I respect that. I respect honesty above all. And even tho I didn't like that comment at first, I respect the user, who made it.
Because I don't care for myself as much as I care for this community. We need mods who will say the truth to the users, even if they feel bad from hearing it.
And how can someone ban or mute a user? How can YOU take such a decision, when all you want is to be liked? You can't.
You should work for the betterment of this community. Try that. And if you're not as angry as I am, ONLY THEN you're a better man than I am... And I know of two others, who are perfectly suited to be mods. More than you and me. We need to respect that.
The post is so that we're aware of our pedigrees and so that there's clear information that is compiled by the same objective standards.
Is it? How so? There's no conclusion in your post.
If you see satanism in it, I don't.
Then you don't understand it.
The Society of Jesus is fully part of the Roman Catholics (not a split) so either it shows itself redeemed or it falls just like any other work arising within the body. Freemasonry is an ecumenical movement, and Rosicrucianism is a gnostic movement, that never pretended to be or to come from denominations.
Any division is a denomination. You just use this word for splitting of the church, which is also demonic.
Again, how would you recognize a real enemy there?
Also, it's possible to list 100 sects of Judaism or of Islam, but I don't find it worth my interest to go beyond a few main divisions.
Oh, really? How sad for you...
Just say you can't, buddy.
After all I heard you say in the past, you're all - all talk and no game. You really talk too much, when you shouldn't.
I'll wait for this list of 100 sects of Judaism first. Or make 100 sects of Islam first. (I know that you won't, but it's so nice to mock you...)
Whenever you're ready, pal. I'll wait.
We should be on the lookout for that - true!
They seem to push it a lot lately with this news. Probably not the final news, but the scenario is clear -> Aliens -> Meteor, or Asteroid.. whatever it is -> Causing a big electrical problem with most people, so they can get off their PC/mobile asses to look up in the sky for the big show -> Big BlueBeam project show -> Phone alerts (that's why they tested them in recent years) -> and what happens next is beyond anyone's mind...
Just like 9/11 predictive programming. Actually, just like any predictive programming.
If you think 9/11 predictive programming was all a distraction, then you're correct about that. But it wasn't. So pay close attention when it actually happens...
Ok, let's break this down:
You said "dilatoriness" and "selecting to comment only instead of posting is not trolling" - Is 4 years considered "dilatoriness"?
And who decided to "select comments only"? Not you obviously...
You're being a hypocrite right now.
You're making a personal false equivalence by daring me to delete posts, which isn't a dare I see as useful.
Incorrect. I challenge you to go into the shoes of the bot you defend, and you're not willing.
Hypocrite.
I still want posts to be high-effort and well-placed.
No you don't, if you defend someone who never posts...
Hypocritical again.
I'm mystified why your response runs that direction.
I showed you pure data about your account and the bot account. You defended a bot account. Explain it to me how this is "mystifying"... Please.
You're just in denial. You like this bot.
I started advanced psychology in 6th grade, I was beating the Chinese in math in 6th grade... Who are you trying to convince with your SAT words? English is not even my native language, I beat your arguments with pure facts.
This bot user has been blocked by most in here. Your personal liking to this bot would never work.
You can't make someone post.
Never has been my aim, buddy. It's just shows that some users in here spend 4 years in commenting and contributing nothing with their posts. It's pretty simple...
Should I use SAT words so it's well understood by you?
Looking forward to your thoughts on my swift report to Paleo and his swift use of the suspension tool. Now let's see how I would think about your questions.
Is that a threat?
Go on, pal. Let's see how far you go with that. You never checked my previous activity, you really think I fear threats?
I raised the topic about moderation, you'll do well to remember that fact. And you wanted to be a mod by clinging to my post. That's why you raised it to someone else tagging me there.
Sometimes I don't want to know so much psychology because I see people as they really are. And do you want to know what people hate the most - someone telling them what they really are...
Isn't that fkd up?
That's a good post - https://conspiracies.win/p/17tegZSGDy/friendly-reminder-on-how-to-spot/c/ (Not mine, I just share the already compiled work of someone else)
Good list of the actions that shills take. Mods must take note of these when deciding who to remove/mute/deal with...
It's true, but the point I was making was to show researchers that the evil ones are really pushing for the BlueBeam Project. And it seems that they will initiate it soon.
If you spot any similar news on the subject, I would appreciate it if you post them!
That's the same post through scored... Definitely not a mirror post...
And how is my post same post "dual" in your opinion?