I'm glad u finally got over the message being sent twice and not "triggered' anymore..😉
Also it's nice that your last message isn't "projecting' your feelings about it. Well done.
Like I said if there's something u would like to know about the Mandela effect feel free to ask.
Never once said there's proof on the millions of people remembering that book exactly how I do although it should noted that all us remember it the exact same way.
As far as I know it's a theory about paralel universe that seems like a huge stretch to me because some people remember different events in different ways...
So, can we go from there? What is the Mandela effect in your opinion, and what proofs or suggestions have you found that support it?
My proof is the top ladder of this world is run by generational Satanists.
Personally I think it's an opt where they've figured out how to go back and change reality...the logo changes and bears names are just them feeling out what they can do and get away with.
I think the main goal is to change out the Bible and verses within. The fact that the most changes have occurred with it shows they're true motives.
Everything in life has a purpose, and that's God's will. If you were able to go back in time and change something, then you go again God's will, not only that - but you overcome it, which is impossible.
I also see your points but being a satanist is not a proof of changing the timeline, the other 2 sentences are only theoretical.
My theory is that they use anything related to different timelines to convince people that your actions don't matter, if another timeline can do it differently, and God's decisions can be overruled by humans, if they can change the timeline.
The Mandela effect stands on very few examples that illogically lead to a grand conclusion. However, every parallel universe scenario leads to a paradox, not tiny changes in what people remember.
I agree that they are satanists, but even Satan couldn't get even half the angels to follow him... How can we then assume that he can overturn any of God's decisions?
I grew up with the Berenstain Bears and always knew how to spell them. But I totally recognize there are other things where the touchstone I used to try to remember something was indicated by others to be faulty and I couldn't select decidability between my memory echo and their evidence. Fruit of the Loom is one I have trouble with; I also keep trying to put "bases" into "All your base are belong to us".
I suspect that there are slippabilities that are so common as to be shared experiences and this boosts their signal when discovered at the Mandela level. There will of course also be corporate and government denials of the past, which is normal, but those can usually be disproven quickly like emperor's clothes. It's those borderline cases where many independent memories appear to challenge something (and this challenge also appears grassroots and not manipulative) that leave the question open.
My smoking gun is the fact that everyone remembers it distinctly the other way...if we all have bad memories than why isn't there other options as to what it used to be?
I wouldn't have known what a cornucopia is as a kid if it wasn't for fruit of the loom.
3x triggered + 2x projecting + 1x dumbass...
Nice communication skills there.
When you can't directly reply, I'll ask you 5 times if necessary. It's fun.
Ok, go ahead and explain your Mandela effect... How can you prove something so drastic from a children's book?
Let's see that "willingness to help" of yours...
I'm glad u finally got over the message being sent twice and not "triggered' anymore..😉
Also it's nice that your last message isn't "projecting' your feelings about it. Well done.
Like I said if there's something u would like to know about the Mandela effect feel free to ask.
Never once said there's proof on the millions of people remembering that book exactly how I do although it should noted that all us remember it the exact same way.
)ew bears baby.
Ok, how is the Mandela effect proved?
As far as I know it's a theory about paralel universe that seems like a huge stretch to me because some people remember different events in different ways...
So, can we go from there? What is the Mandela effect in your opinion, and what proofs or suggestions have you found that support it?
My proof is the top ladder of this world is run by generational Satanists.
Personally I think it's an opt where they've figured out how to go back and change reality...the logo changes and bears names are just them feeling out what they can do and get away with.
I think the main goal is to change out the Bible and verses within. The fact that the most changes have occurred with it shows they're true motives.
Everything in life has a purpose, and that's God's will. If you were able to go back in time and change something, then you go again God's will, not only that - but you overcome it, which is impossible.
I also see your points but being a satanist is not a proof of changing the timeline, the other 2 sentences are only theoretical.
My theory is that they use anything related to different timelines to convince people that your actions don't matter, if another timeline can do it differently, and God's decisions can be overruled by humans, if they can change the timeline.
The Mandela effect stands on very few examples that illogically lead to a grand conclusion. However, every parallel universe scenario leads to a paradox, not tiny changes in what people remember.
I agree that they are satanists, but even Satan couldn't get even half the angels to follow him... How can we then assume that he can overturn any of God's decisions?
I grew up with the Berenstain Bears and always knew how to spell them. But I totally recognize there are other things where the touchstone I used to try to remember something was indicated by others to be faulty and I couldn't select decidability between my memory echo and their evidence. Fruit of the Loom is one I have trouble with; I also keep trying to put "bases" into "All your base are belong to us".
I suspect that there are slippabilities that are so common as to be shared experiences and this boosts their signal when discovered at the Mandela level. There will of course also be corporate and government denials of the past, which is normal, but those can usually be disproven quickly like emperor's clothes. It's those borderline cases where many independent memories appear to challenge something (and this challenge also appears grassroots and not manipulative) that leave the question open.
My smoking gun is the fact that everyone remembers it distinctly the other way...if we all have bad memories than why isn't there other options as to what it used to be?
I wouldn't have known what a cornucopia is as a kid if it wasn't for fruit of the loom.