it's not the world that's fake and gay, just the screens.
real world is still fine dude
Defense attorney Peter Martin said that attack was "certainly not a hate crime" but rather was "completely based on chemical dependency problems." District Judge Peter Cahill said that York's progress in treatment so far is commendable.
"It sounds like you've already started all the things you're suppose to to address issues of chemical health so this doesn't happen again. … Keep up the good work. We don't want you to be back here."
"I don't want to be back here," York said.
The state agreed to dismiss first-degree robbery counts against both defendants. Despite the fact that York possessed the victim's purse with her ID inside, there was no proof that he used force specifically to take her property.
Read this in the voice of "David Van Driessen" (Beavis & Butthead's libtard teacher) for extra dramatic effect
There have been numerous failed experiments to attempt to prove contagion by passing bodily fluids from the sick to the healthy. Spacebusters goes into these at the beginning of this documentary:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ch8v4TVL9yq0/
Why are people hostile to this idea? It's hard to admit you're wrong when you're personally invested by allowing doctors to inject you and your children with "vaccines".
it's a loyalty test
GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT
- The Rooster Tails of "moon dust" (concrete premix) are impossible without an atmosphere
- There is no possible way the TV antennta on the rover stayed aligned to earth while driving about.
- The rover is an obvious miniature.
NASA didn't commit to the hoax until roughly the point where Webb quit as director. This is explained in the documentary "American Moon".
Wrong
The 500 EL Data Cameras did not have a viewfinder, as the astronaut’s helmets restricted movement too much for it to be useful.
https://sterileeye.com/2009/07/23/the-apollo-11-hasselblad-cameras/
wow it's like you have more than 1 account or something
- Cameras weren't sealed against vacuum
- Cameras weren't protected from the radiation of space
- Cameras were chest mounted with NO VIEWFINDER
Why the lame negative attitude dude?
What is the source of that screenshot? Where did you get it? Who told you to post it here? Let me guess, you, suddenly, will never answer this questions. :)
You seem awfully concerned. I'll let you in on a secret. There's a forum just like this, only better, and I copied it from there.
Talking about the RTV, not the metal. Obviously.
Let's hear your list of "acceptable" moonhoax theories since you obviously have HUUUGE powers of discernment. Maybe this time without the wall of text?
You've managed to completely miss the point again.
It's not the pressure or the strength. Its the effect the vacuum itself has. It causes materials to outgas. This means they literally turn to gas and just FLOAT AWAY.
The vacuum you use in your shop on epoxy is a low grade, ROUGH, vacuum. It's too weak to do this. Nothing like the high vacuum of space.
AND FOR THE TARDS WHO THINK SPACE IS JUST GOING UNDERWATER IN REVERSE....
You're not getting it.
The pressure isn't the problem. The vacuum is. Hard vacuum (10^-6 torr or greater) causes materials to outgas. This means the material weight is literally reduced by the vacuum as molecules of it turn gaseous and float away. The seals are elastomers, which are especially susceptible to outgassing.
There's a whole field of materials science related to using this to create thin coatings.
The hard vacuum of space is a uniquely hostile environment to man-made materials.
"Medical Episode"...
The blandest most legalize way of saying it.
AND FOR THE TARDS WHO THINK SPACE IS JUST GOING UNDERWATER IN REVERSE....
You're not getting it.
The pressure isn't the problem. The vacuum is. Hard vacuum (10^-6 torr or greater) causes materials to outgas. This means the material weight is literally reduced by the vacuum as molecules of it transfer turn gaseous and float away. The seals are are elastomers, which are especially susceptible to outgassing.
There's a whole field of materials science related to using this to create thin coatings.
The hard vacuum of space is a uniquely hostile environment to man-made materials.
You're not getting it.
The pressure isn't the problem. The vacuum is. Hard vacuum (10^-6 torr or greater) causes materials to outgas. This means the material weight is literally reduced by the vacuum. The seals of the zipper assembly are are elastomers, which are especially susceptible to outgassing.
There's a whole field of materials science related to using this to create thin coatings.
It's not just going underwater in reverse. The hard vacuum of space is a uniquely hostile environment to man-made materials.
Yeah mine's velcro. Easy to get into and out of.
entitled huff LOL
More detail here:
So did they send animals to the moon?
Materials start to off-gas at extremely low pressures. This is actually how many high-tech coatings are applied.
You can't have the material that is sealing against the vacuum off-gassing. Eventually there will be no seal.
You don't understand the concept of out gassing.
You're not addressing the main point. Which is that NASA supposedly sent MANNED vehicles into an environment without testing them first for the ability to handle that environment. This is UNHEARD OF in industry and engineering.
If it's so easy to build craft that handle 10^-12 torr vacuum, why not prove it in a vaccum chamber on earth?
What side is vacuum only matters structurally. The seals on hatches, space gloves, windows, any joint between materials, they all need to handle 10^-12 torr vacuum. That's hard because traditional seals like o-rings outgas at that pressure. You need metal on metal, single time use, seals. Without those, your precious 1 atm is leaking out into space FAST.
So it's like crypto but without any of the stuff that makes crypto good