All Hasselblads have top-mounted viewfinder. Always had. Part of the design. You focus by looking down onto the top and adjusting the lens by a barrel ring.
Second, lack of atmosphere IMPROVES photography because there are no molecules to add diffraction between target and camera.
Very interesting. A Hasselblad 500EL is then not really a Hasselblad 500 series, as it was so extensively modified. It is purely a custom camera on a Hasselblad frame.
Now, if according to your assertion that the moon landing was filmed in a studio, why the F would NASA bother to charter an expensive camera project if they didn't have to? They could have put a dummy camera on the actors. This is no proof of a studio simulation.
And some of the claims of hoax made in the sterileeye comments section are so plain stupid, showing misunderstanding of vacuum and heat transfer.
All Hasselblads have top-mounted viewfinder. Always had. Part of the design. You focus by looking down onto the top and adjusting the lens by a barrel ring.
Second, lack of atmosphere IMPROVES photography because there are no molecules to add diffraction between target and camera.
Wrong
https://sterileeye.com/2009/07/23/the-apollo-11-hasselblad-cameras/
Very interesting. A Hasselblad 500EL is then not really a Hasselblad 500 series, as it was so extensively modified. It is purely a custom camera on a Hasselblad frame.
Now, if according to your assertion that the moon landing was filmed in a studio, why the F would NASA bother to charter an expensive camera project if they didn't have to? They could have put a dummy camera on the actors. This is no proof of a studio simulation.
And some of the claims of hoax made in the sterileeye comments section are so plain stupid, showing misunderstanding of vacuum and heat transfer.
NASA didn't commit to the hoax until roughly the point where Webb quit as director. This is explained in the documentary "American Moon".