2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I talked to my dentist recently. I’ve only had two cavities my whole life. We were discussing options for my current one. I said, “Doc, I am not in pain, and I do not want a mercury filling.”

She laughed and said, “you know there’s only an extremely tiny amount of mercury, right?”

I told her what happened to my other filling.

It fucking came out and I almost swallowed the whole fucking thing at once.

She’s now understanding of my concern, for the wrong reasons maybe, but hey progress.

5
MO-Carpenter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep. They banned me from the great awakening for merely being skeptical of this shit.

It’s absurd, the “i want to believe” is really intoxicating apparently.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Staying home was also fairly common during that time.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds fun but I doubt it.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

hahaha now you’re saying it’s not real pedophilia when Micheal Jackson sleeps with prepubescent children. You should stop talking already. I keep giving you rope and you just keep hanging yourself with it.

You’re absolutely a pedophile now confirmed. I was suspicious but you’ve really come out of your shell there. I’m glad we finally reached this point where your full opinion on the matter has been exposed.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a bunch of retarded Gnostic fanfiction. They spent a lot of time and effort exploring different ways to subvert Christianity.

Hell even in the Talmud (which came after Christ) they say Jesus was a pedophile incel who made a religion because he was so lonely.

There’s a million different quack versions they’ve used in an attempt to sway people,

But we have accounts from Roman politicians, and historians, seems to have to enough historical evidence he was real and caused quite a big stir. These accounts are important because they had every reason to trash on Jesus because they were actively trying to wipe them out at the time.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Mathematics is the language in which God has written the universe.”

Stop being so autistic and read the WORD instead of focusing on weird schizophrenic numerology.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

On September 13, 1959, during Elvis Presley's Army career, he met Priscilla at a party at his home in Bad Nauheim, Germany.[10] At the time, she was only 14 years old and he was 24. Wikipedia

If you think that’s okay you’re a pedophile, or a pedophile sympathizer.

You’ve spent so much time and effort burying your head in the sand. Normalizing Micheal sleeping with small children, normalizing 14 year olds dating 24 year old men. (In an interview once Priscilla let slip that they met when she was 13 but even if we give the benefit of the doubt and say 14, it’s still disgusting.

If those men’s behavior seems acceptable to you, then you’re enabling pedophilia. Age of consent laws exist because children who are unable to make sound judgements for themselves need protection. If the parents fail those children and give permission, that doesn’t make it morally right to fuck children. Legal=/=okay.

You’ve said enough in defense of child fuckers to last a lifetime.

by pkvi
4
MO-Carpenter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ingersol Lockhart is not affiliated with John McAfee. I got banned from GreatAwakening for even questioning its validity.

Why would he make this dumbass website they can restrict take down or otherwise erase when he could have broadcasted his message in a million ways with the blockchain that would prevent its complete erasure?

Why would he not tell his wife?

If it seems too good to be true, it is.

Keep some healthy skepticism out here people. The psyop boys want you hooked on hopium.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually looked up your marriage claim and it turns out that Priscilla Presley was born on May 24, 1945 and She got married on May 1, 1967 which would make her 13 days away from her 22nd birthday.

On September 13, 1959, during Elvis Presley's Army career, he met Priscilla at a party at his home in Bad Nauheim, Germany.[10] At the time, she was only 14 years old and he was 24. Wikipedia

I got the parental consent thing wrong, she was under the age of consent and therefore he was able to bang this underage girl because he had the parents blessing.

It’s pretty easy to make it about you when you’re totally cool with grown men having inappropriate relations with children. I rarely meet people so determined to defend pedophiles. I question your morals because you seem to be cool with behavior that you wouldn’t tolerate for yourself or your children. You wouldn’t tolerate it because you know it’s wrong to spend hundreds of nights with children in your bed. You wouldn’t tolerate a 24 year old being in a relationship with a 14 year old girl. You justify actions these men publicly admit to. I’m not even going down the rape path. I’m just presenting you with the evidence they admit to.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is a 40 year old man spending hundreds of nights sleeping in the same bed as minors that he has no relation to a witch hunt.

How is Elvis a witch hunt? Elvis began his relationship with his wife when she was 14. Her parents had to give him special permission to marry her, because she wasn’t old enough to consent.

Would you let a 24 year old take your 14 year old out on dates?

Would you let your small child spend the night in Micheals bed?

It’s not a witch hunt when they admit to the behavior in their own words. Just because someone didn’t get prosecuted doesn’t mean they didn’t commit a crime. And sometimes morally abhorrent things are legally allowed.

That doesn’t mean it’s just, that doesn’t mean it’s good. When a 40+ year old man spends the night in the same bed as small children that’s fucking weird. Its not the type of behavior we should accept in a society that seeks to NOT NORMALIZE inappropriate sexual contact between children and adults.

Hell would you let your wife spend the night in bed with another man? Why not? Is there something sexual about spending the night together in the same bed?

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt it. Having a kid sleep in your bed. Not bedroom, bed. 100, 200, 300+ nights? If it walks like a pedo, sleeps with kids like a pedo, it might be a pedo. You can continue to justify adult men sleeping in the same bed with children for hundreds of nights, still won’t make it right.

You wouldn’t allow your children to sleep in his bed, yet you continue to rabidly excuse it. It shows a lot about you.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so it is important to your argument to invoke the image of a teenage slumber party. No sex then, am I right?

Let’s be clear they were younger than teenagers.

I’m not quoting anyone on slumber party but myself: the rest I’m quoting is Michaels own words himself. He allowed children, not teens, to sleep in his bed. He said that. Not any news publication. Micheal Jackson’s own words. I trust his account more than I trust your theory.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you lol

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or realizing that the locking mechanism for most things is obsolete is a smart understanding of security. Yes their initial priority probably won’t be btc but we’ve heard rumors governments had quantum computers now we get to see them finally wagging it around. Knowing security weaknesses across the board is important in the growing better options department.

Knowledge is power, the story is significant regardless if you think the conclusion is wrong.

3
MO-Carpenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like a globalist spook. Why so many name brands and corporate interests. Is this about freedom or about mining and proctor and gamble? Shows this posters priorities. Bet it’s fake.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you keep autisticly tripping over the term slumber party.

Let’s look at a definition since you might not be a native English speaker.

Slumber Party noun a social gathering typically of teenagers held at the home of one of them for the purpose of sleeping there overnight.

It’s another word for sleepover. That’s what the kids did in micheals own bedroom, some of them for 100,200, 300+ nights total. (Not always consecutively)

That’s part of what he admits too.

6
MO-Carpenter 6 points ago +6 / -0

The handwriting is suspect & I doubt the authenticity of the note. It reads more like someone trying to imitate John’s style of tweeting. And if this note was found in his pocket where are the markings of the note being folded into his pocket?

From Janice McAfee’a Twitter. https://twitter.com/theemrsmcafee/status/1415023221024468995?s=20

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahaha that’s funny, and an excellent point. I just figured she was a little tarded.

I build houses, I’ve fell from 2 stories+ twice now and barely had a bruise. Mind you one was landing on 6” of snow, and the second time was in loose dirt.

Good catch though lol.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here’s the link to the video, this isn’t CNN I just only found a transcript that CNN used a clip from.

Here’s the clip. Micheal himself saying the words so you don’t have to take my word or CNNs word for it.

https://youtu.be/blt1Oou3ltc

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well let’s look at his own words shall we:

MICHAEL JACKSON, SINGER: We have guest rooms, but whenever kids come here, they always want to stay with me. They never want to stay in the guest -- and I have never invited them in my room. They always just want to stay. They say, "Can I stay with you tonight?" I go, "If it`s OK with your parents, yes, you can."

https://youtu.be/blt1Oou3ltc

All molestation claims as aide: I don’t know what a grown man was doing with small children sleeping in his bedroom. Do you think it’s normal or okay for a grown man to do this? Is this the kind of behavior we should normalize?

Would you encourage your nieces, nephews, siblings, or children to spend 100, 200, 300+ nights over at some mans house?

Because that’s what he admits to, he doesn’t admit to the sexual stuff, but what he admits to is insane.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am argumenting from the writings of true gnostics.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dunno buddy... Religion should be about sin. I always find the Buddhist/Gnostic "seek wisdom" stuff to be somewhat an appeal to arrogance. Wisdom is virtue in all religions, but it shouldn't be thee virtue. If you use you wisdom for sin, you're just really good at sinning (ie: illuminati).

Well said. Absolutely agree 100%.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read the image you’re posting under. OP posted an image and we’re all here commenting under it. It reads:

To truly see the light of the truth of the world, we must realize (use real eyes) that our inner Lucifer (fire, phosphorus, spirit) must rise like the serpent

When you say Gnostics have nothing to do with Lucifer while commenting on a Neo-Gnostic image that DIRECTLY NAMES LUCIFER you might be wrong here.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›