Could Michael Jackson have been framed to be a predator by people who are actually predators? After all, there is a quote attributed to Karl Marx that states to "accuse the other side of what you are doing," so it could very well be possible that they did the same thing to a man who's childhood was stolen and was never able to grow up mentally out from it as a sacrificial lamb to make the people think that the predators are being stopped, but in reality, have been able to get away. Is it possible that he was framed for alleged predatory acts, and perhaps even disposed of because of becoming more of a liability than an asset?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
I got the parental consent thing wrong, she was under the age of consent and therefore he was able to bang this underage girl because he had the parents blessing.
It’s pretty easy to make it about you when you’re totally cool with grown men having inappropriate relations with children. I rarely meet people so determined to defend pedophiles. I question your morals because you seem to be cool with behavior that you wouldn’t tolerate for yourself or your children. You wouldn’t tolerate it because you know it’s wrong to spend hundreds of nights with children in your bed. You wouldn’t tolerate a 24 year old being in a relationship with a 14 year old girl. You justify actions these men publicly admit to. I’m not even going down the rape path. I’m just presenting you with the evidence they admit to.
Now it seems you were just a troll all along. Bye.
If you think that’s okay you’re a pedophile, or a pedophile sympathizer.
You’ve spent so much time and effort burying your head in the sand. Normalizing Micheal sleeping with small children, normalizing 14 year olds dating 24 year old men. (In an interview once Priscilla let slip that they met when she was 13 but even if we give the benefit of the doubt and say 14, it’s still disgusting.
If those men’s behavior seems acceptable to you, then you’re enabling pedophilia. Age of consent laws exist because children who are unable to make sound judgements for themselves need protection. If the parents fail those children and give permission, that doesn’t make it morally right to fuck children. Legal=/=okay.
You’ve said enough in defense of child fuckers to last a lifetime.
I could have sworn I said goodbye to you.
In any case, since you've devolved into simply attacking me personally...
On me being a pedophile or a pedophile sympathizer:
Pedophilic Disorder DSM-5 302.2 (F65.4) https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/pedophilic-disorder-dsm--5-302.2-(f65.4) Pedophilic Disorder is a DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition), diagnosis assigned to adults ( defined as age 16 and up) who have sexual desire for prepubescent children (American Psychiatric Association, 2013a).
Your narrative has neither a prepubescent child nor evidence of sexual activity. Given that, you couldn't be more fundamentally wrong in your accusations?
My opinion (whatever it may be) about people meeting at parties in the 1950s doesn't enable anything. Your assertion that the father was somehow able to give legal consent for his daughter to have sex is laughable, but I think we all know now that you are intending to entertain people.
hahaha now you’re saying it’s not real pedophilia when Micheal Jackson sleeps with prepubescent children. You should stop talking already. I keep giving you rope and you just keep hanging yourself with it.
You’re absolutely a pedophile now confirmed. I was suspicious but you’ve really come out of your shell there. I’m glad we finally reached this point where your full opinion on the matter has been exposed.