No it’s not, colt didn’t run society wide propaganda encouraging and coercing black on black violence or they’d get fired from their non existent jobs
It’s ironic because Arthur Koestler actively participated in this. He wrote Ghost in the Machine, an early transhumanist technocratic blueprint. He advised and advocated for some of the worst things we see beginning to be actualized today.
This is a really good point, thank you.
He’s definitely not named that on Reddit, I already have that username.
I’m talking about this:
Also notice how they refer to them as “call boys” and prostitutes instead of underage sex slaves or underage sex trafficking victims.
Hit the Carter Reagan and Bush Sr Whitehouse and Bill Barr personally buried it. This was pre-Epstein.
Well trump and bitch McConnell hired the guy who made his bones covering up White House underage sex trafficking for the Bush White House, I’m surprised more didn’t go wrong with Barr.
Your title makes no sense brother, I too would like to know what you’re attempting to communicate.
It appears to show swords and combat related stuff leading up to the gene splicing, some sick face emojis, then the moon, which is emphasized by several exclamation points afterwards. Then two dragons, some weird person emoji I’m unfamiliar with. Then the atomic, nuclear hazard, and biohazard symbols then it points and arrow and says END.
It definitely gets easier to read at the end.
Well John McCain was in country parading around onstage with em before the coup. We’ve been funding them since the fucking 1953 at least that we know publicly.
Fun fact; the original 007, famous occultist, and advisor to the Queen of England John Dee is credited with the suggestion that England should attempt to erase any knowledge of previous claims to America. It was a part of a geopolitical strategy to lay greater claim and undermine the much older Spanish and French settlers.
This is only one minor aspect of the attempts to rewrite history but I always found it fascinating that some old wanna be warlock had so much influence.
Thanks I’ll check it out. I appreciate you taking the time to talk with me today.
I don’t think we are in a matrix. I am an orthodox Christian. I believe in transcendent categories like Self/agency/intentionality Time/space Unity/ diversity Identity over time Causation Teleology Laws of logic Abstract concepts Meaning
All exist outside of our empirical observations. Orthodox Christianity has a pretty solid explanation for metaphysics. I’m not a philosopher and am ignorant but that’s where I’m personally coming from.
Also I’m not upset with anyone for having different views, but I love the pursuit of truth and having dialogues about this stuff.
You are making a claim that lacks the possibility of being proven at all. It’s impossible to prove, which is my concern.
There is no way you can be in the matrix, and show proof of it, without access to outside the matrix. It’s impossible. All of your observations within the matrix are created by the matrix in your view. Your only reality is fabricated and you have no access beyond it. Any experiment from physics, astrophysics, quantum physics will all yield results that are matrix results. Any information you gather is corrupted by the fact that it’s gathered from the matrix.
It destoys the possibility for you to justify your claim at all levels, logical and physical.
Any double slit experiment will still be within the matrix and therefore it will only show you what the matrix indicates.
Your position is unknowable, you’ve yet to address that.
As for the definition of simulation. Do the words sham, counterfeit, imitative mean anything?
That concept works for only a superficial level. I’m talking on a grand scheme. When I play a video game like Skyrim, the game is real, the keyboard is real, I’m really interacting with a programmed reality. But am I a wizard that can ride dragons? No.
Can I learn useful things yes, but one thing you can never learn in a simulation is that you are in a simulation.
It’s completely unknowable and unprovable because everything that could be used as evidence is apart of the simulation. This has been pondered since Ancient Greece.
Just because reality is an illusion / simulation / trick, doesnt mean that its not real.
That’s literally the definition of simulation though. I like where you’re logically headed that our actions matter and I applaud you there but I think your case may need to flesh out the vocabulary a little bit first. We can learn from video games and simulations I’m not arguing against that at all, but to say that a simulation is real is antithetical to the definition of simulation.
If we are living in a simulation, then your idea that this is a simulation is also apart of the simulation. It defeats itself.
It’s akin to saying reality is false, except for the part that told me reality is false.
I mean, maybe it puts a bit a kink in "Evolution" (but they don't seem too worried about the huge plot holes there) and it lends some support to the Bible, but otherwise who cares?
Well since we are on conspiracy I’ll throw in my crazy.
The plot holes in evolution, the really weak “simulation theory” items pushed in our pop scientism. (Ex. 1) (Ex. 2) (Ex. 3) Are similar to Buddhism, Gnosticism, hermeticism, Freemasons, illuminate, and even philosophical views such as nihilism and postmodernism. These all share a similar views of essentially reality is fake and gay, either kill yourself or kill others on the way out. This inverts the Christian ethic of us being responsible for every action, every thought, that we aren’t victims.
I think covering up Nephilim, the true nature of reality, the subversion of Christianity, the creepy occult obsession of a SIGNIFICANT amount of powerful people from the beginning of time until now all point towards something higher than ourselves.
I’m a Christian so I have that bias. Honestly I was agnostic most of my life but the more I saw creepy occult stuff among the elite led me to study religion more.
Even science has such poor answers that it’s almost lazy. Simulation theory (who made the simulation?) directed panspermia (who directed all that jizz?) life evolving from primordial soup struck by lightening (lol Ancient Greece called they want their mythology back), ancient aliens(gods and demons relabeled ET), it’s all essentially hinging religious beliefs that make less sense the more we learn.
I think there’s a deliberate effort to take us further from the truth because they want to ursup God. It’s luciferian. Any school of thought that tells you “you don’t matter” “existence doesn’t matter” “it’s all an illusion” “random chance” all lead people to suicide, disillusionment, terrible decisions. I truly think these philosophies are purposely harmful to humans.
I’m done rambling but I’ll close with this: don’t let anyone tell you you don’t matter existence doesn’t matter, you do matter.
You had me right up until UN Human Rights expert. Just kidding Isreal is going insane in the Middle East. Israel has been more relentless in her persecution of Christians in Palestine than anyone on earth currently. Meanwhile the CIA influenced ecumenical movement in the US would have you believe in “judeo-Christian values” and how Israel must be protected. While Israel displaces, murders, desecrates temples and graveyards of some of the oldest Christian heritige in the world.
That sure is an interesting logo ya got there.
The new normal
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Mathew 10:28
From my reading and limited understanding In Christianity the only person who can fuck with your soul is the Lord. Someone can poison you, kill you, do all kinds of awful stuff to you, and sometimes you even get rewarded for it. To my knowledge nobodies faggy little dark arts rituals mean shit compared to God. I am highly suspicious of anyone implying anything they give you removed your soul, and in Christian theology yes someone who’s paralyzed has a soul. Someone who’s brain dead has a soul. Paralytics are something Jesus personally dealt with in the books of Mathew Mark Luke and John.
That’s why abortion and euthanasia are such hot topics for certain people of faith because they believe in their immortal soul.
I also similarly wouldn’t assume we become soulless when we are unconscious for sleep, or surgery, or otherwise incapacitated. It’s irrelevant if it’s permanent or temporary. If they are alive they’re alive, and Christian also have resurrection so even if you’re dead there’s still life after death. None of what these Catholics are saying make sense, furthermore if they’re going against Rome, they are violating the First Vatican Council. So by their own silly rules they’re heretical and supposedly damned. (I’m not a Roman Catholic, but I’m aware of their rules)
HG Wells wrote a book in 1940 called New World Order. The terms on the technocratic elite are not exclusive to one entity.
Are we just listing non sequiturs or did you have a point to make?
Someone already saying something seems dismissive, when in reality more people talking like this should be more concerning.
Joe Biden did a Wall Street Journal Op Ed in 1992 titled, “How I learned to love the New World Order”
Arthur Koestler wasn’t warning he was cheerleading and actively planning. You can argue about Orwell but if you’re trying to use the same argument for Koestler you’re likely just uninformed.