In lieu of an earlier post, I find most people really don't know anything at all about the giants of our past, and often assume it's all a big myth. Lincoln was so matter of fact about it, likely because it was a general known fact at that time. In 1881, Congress gave sole excavation rights of these mounds to the Smithsonian and gave them thousands of tax payer dollars to do so more than once. We all know what happens when they get involved in recovering history; anything consequential disappears. Some of their findings were made public in their Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for years 1873, 1875, and 1877. I'll post a link below to 1873 and you can change the years to view the rest. They found skulls measuring 36" in circumference, skeletons belonging to "gigantic savages," and so on. Publicly, The Smithsonian seems to mostly or only talk about the EASTERN mounds, but look for the stories from the Anasazi and also San Canyon Pueblo where footprints of 6 toed giants were found.
Would love to see what anyone knows about all this or give more info for those that want to know more. Of course this is just a glimpse of the story, definitely enough here to get started. This rabbit hole goes on and on once you start, but you will not be disappointed. It's more like, whole rabbit.
For those that want to go down the Giants/Nephilim road, there's also a very convincing story about giant remains being found on Jekyll island, along with a sacrificial altar built the same way the Canaanites built theirs. If it's true, the building that the infamous banksters' meeting happened in was built right on top of that altar. Search for Tim Bence on that story.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/34977#page/426/mode/1up (Human skull found measured 36 inches in circumference) https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln2/1:6?rgn=div1;view=fulltext https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11-12.pdf
You are making a claim that lacks the possibility of being proven at all. It’s impossible to prove, which is my concern.
There is no way you can be in the matrix, and show proof of it, without access to outside the matrix. It’s impossible. All of your observations within the matrix are created by the matrix in your view. Your only reality is fabricated and you have no access beyond it. Any experiment from physics, astrophysics, quantum physics will all yield results that are matrix results. Any information you gather is corrupted by the fact that it’s gathered from the matrix.
It destoys the possibility for you to justify your claim at all levels, logical and physical.
Any double slit experiment will still be within the matrix and therefore it will only show you what the matrix indicates.
Do you think your consciousness is within the matrix?
I don’t think we are in a matrix. I am an orthodox Christian. I believe in transcendent categories like Self/agency/intentionality Time/space Unity/ diversity Identity over time Causation Teleology Laws of logic Abstract concepts Meaning
All exist outside of our empirical observations. Orthodox Christianity has a pretty solid explanation for metaphysics. I’m not a philosopher and am ignorant but that’s where I’m personally coming from.
Also I’m not upset with anyone for having different views, but I love the pursuit of truth and having dialogues about this stuff.
Well if you want some alternate views have fun with the book I guess.
Thanks I’ll check it out. I appreciate you taking the time to talk with me today.