8
KiloRomeo 8 points ago +8 / -0

NIH was responsible for safety and efficacy of the jab and for compelling its use. Yet they held the patent from their research going back 20+ years and made $400 million licensing it!

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nih-refuses-release-details-covid-19-vaccine-royalty-agreement

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's agitprop for boomers to get them to green light ww3

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The invention of nuclear has caused all modern conflict with top tier states to become hybridized proxy conflicts

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +3 / -1

They've clearly tried to shut down O'Keefe.... So, why haven't they done worse? Probably because he pushed passed the barrier of insignificance such that they can't just disappear him without making him more influential. He also likely passes a treasure trove of unpublished insurance docs.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have to be compromised to gain power. Proof

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't it odd the way they tried to make it a left vs right issue... almost as if they're trying to cull the dems

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's literally: do whatever you can get away with

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

At a high level this is confusing because of the idea of informative and conditioning. As humans we're naturally used to explaining things based upon events that have happened this is a hack that enables us to process information. Unfortunately it backfired in cases such as these.

The probability of it being behind your door (1/3) or the other doors (2/3) doesn't change, it's independent of the events. When a door is opened we know that it is not behind one door so the 2/3 probability now only has a degree of freedom of 0 whereas before it has a df of 1. So the offs haven't changed but the df has.

Here's another way to look at it. The average probability does change however (1/3 + 2/3)/2 --> 1/2. This differs from what it was at the beginning (1/3+1/3+1/3)/3-->1/3 because there are fewer degrees of freedom.

So notice there at first there were N-1 or 2 degrees of freedom for the entire context. And N-2=1 for the other doors. Opening a door removes the only degree of freedom for the subgroup. It is this added constraint that increases the rate at which you can infer about this subgroup, especially upon the last guess. It has no more degrees of freedom to vary.

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't heard of this term used before but I've referred to this tactic. I'm going to use this. There's a related technique where they make up new words and use coordinated media to manifest it.

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Predator prey dynamics. They're probably tuned to emerge at an interval that exceeds the lifespan of their primary predators

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's fake here's why: the remote control (which uses diodes) seems directionally insensitive and yet the diodes at the ends are directionally sensitive.

3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you've figured it out before, what's really going on, if I recall you passed about it a while ago. Anyways those things have amped up for reasons related to recent events. From there we can connect the dots

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

It also hit the support head on which is super suspicious. That said, the video loss could be explainable based upon the power being shut off. So, why was power off? They were trying to power cycle the system?

3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

And autos. Though some of that is due to scarcity. What's interesting is that commodities are soaring. I think we'll see inflation continue in those and consumer goods but deflation in discretionary and luxury. Japan 1980s 🤷‍♂️

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank God for the courage of this man to come forward

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could be the chemtrails

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would explain how they had intelligence informing them of the attack

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not the type of behavior that inspires confidence in the ability to responsibly manage advanced weaponry.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember when peer reviewed research into alternative treatments were determined to be dangerous misinformation by fact checking groups funded by pfizer? I remember.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's crazy his fast they were to downplay the idea that it was bad actors. Supposedly DOT was informed but the cars were still allowed to cross the bridge. It was a mass casualty event but they're not really focusing on this instead it's all "what does this mean for your consumer goods" inflation justification propaganda.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's been a huge ramp up in "concern" over mental health. Notice how they're eager to toe mental health concerns to veterans and other groups who are competent with arms.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›