This is essentially what happens. Anarchism leads to tribalism which leads to states. The largest gangster wins against smaller gangsters. His point about disputing this with digital technologies is really interesting though. Something there for sure
The numbers stations changed about two weeks ago. I'm not sure how that's connected with the flight plans, maybe someone has found a correlation.
The arrest for stealing on the job... easiest explanation could be she has some sort of narcissistic personality disorder, illusions of grandeur and self importance. Who is she talking? Is it the translator or is she on the phone?
It's odd to see them openly stating they're operating in our country. I thought we made such foreign influence illegal. That said, not sure why these protesters are the targets. Seems like they have more credible and immediate threats with the attacks emanating from iran and Yemen
The data clearly illustrates how this is some of the worst inflation we've seen in this country. Yet this nonstop propaganda. The cost of owning a house has doubled in the last few years. So has food. So have cars. It's insane. We're going to be forced to admit the currency is fake soon.
NIH was responsible for safety and efficacy of the jab and for compelling its use. Yet they held the patent from their research going back 20+ years and made $400 million licensing it!
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nih-refuses-release-details-covid-19-vaccine-royalty-agreement
They've clearly tried to shut down O'Keefe.... So, why haven't they done worse? Probably because he pushed passed the barrier of insignificance such that they can't just disappear him without making him more influential. He also likely passes a treasure trove of unpublished insurance docs.
At a high level this is confusing because of the idea of informative and conditioning. As humans we're naturally used to explaining things based upon events that have happened this is a hack that enables us to process information. Unfortunately it backfired in cases such as these.
The probability of it being behind your door (1/3) or the other doors (2/3) doesn't change, it's independent of the events. When a door is opened we know that it is not behind one door so the 2/3 probability now only has a degree of freedom of 0 whereas before it has a df of 1. So the offs haven't changed but the df has.
Here's another way to look at it. The average probability does change however (1/3 + 2/3)/2 --> 1/2. This differs from what it was at the beginning (1/3+1/3+1/3)/3-->1/3 because there are fewer degrees of freedom.
So notice there at first there were N-1 or 2 degrees of freedom for the entire context. And N-2=1 for the other doors. Opening a door removes the only degree of freedom for the subgroup. It is this added constraint that increases the rate at which you can infer about this subgroup, especially upon the last guess. It has no more degrees of freedom to vary.
What Malice does not state here as an example but in my opinion is probably the best example is the 400 year reign of the Dutch East India Company. While corporatism is not identical to anarchism its ostensibly similar right to draw a parallel.