Why create a new account to then create a link post that redirects to a url hiding service. Who would click something like that?

I was just thinking about this. Also, the market has shady priced in QE so if/when it happens it will probably be more of a sector rebalance than a rising tide.

Yeah not sure why they deleted it

Not sure but I'd offer a different perspective on the content- seemed to be posting a lot of controlled op "resistance lite" type of stuff. Tucker is essentially thus- a source of approved counter narrative content intended to prevent fomenting of legitimate angst.

Don't get me wrong what they posted last week needed to come out except... it's been out since the beginning among alt sources. So why now? Because they're trying to lure everyone back to complacency.

🤡 🌎

Probably true but then again this would likely turn into QE INFINITY 3.0

Brings up another good point- some of these banks have huge amortized losses. Wow look at ALLY. Car loans in general are a powder keg

Pdf sources: https://www.fdic.gov/about/financial-reports/reports/2022annualreport/ar22section3.pdf

Do they have the money though? Looks like they only have $94 billion as of 2017
https://www.fdic.gov/about/financial-reports/report/2017annualreport/section5-01.html

People were lining up outside in the rain to get their money out yesterday.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/yellen-says-government-will-help-svb-depositors-no-bailout-fed-fdic-hopes-talk-special

And trump is somehow a part of this too. He could/should have done more if he was really a "white hat"

More like free falling

Russell brand too.

How do you get dark mode on zh

Time to really pay attention https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/credit-suisse-crashes-all-time-low-after-boosting-deposit-rates-reverse-bank-run

This is probably only the first wave. Who funded SVB? They're likely in jeopardy too it would logically seem

The future of the internet is bots chatting with each other

Well this aged well

Cool now try spike protein vaccinated ferrets.

This is basically 20,000/2,000,000 or 1% sterilized- that we're aware of!

Now let's say 10% of service members are actively trying to have kids (this feels a bit generous honestly), then the population level effect here could be 1/10%x1%==>10% sterilized

Was going to add that the background rate is actually closer to 5% if you exclude first few weeks

Yeah a part of me wonders whether the authors were trying to get the word out by using malicious compliance

Really? Had no idea it was that high

Were all the premature deaths for the myocarditis and what not just a side effect of this primary cause?

This is the first time I noticed this data error- in confirmation of what was reported last night during that conference.