Grey bars are covid-neg antibodies from samples back to 2015. Basically grey dots are low for all spikes. Common cold (aka normal coronavirus) causes grey and red dots to both be high for other proteins.
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420306103?via%3Dihub
Increase in critical adverse events by 3:1000. They’re not disclosing what those events are, can’t find the raw study 🤔
All the “credibility of the journal” stuff to me largely feels dogmatic. The merits of the study leave plenty of questions to answer though they have laid out a repeatable method to track this over time.
I thought appendix A was clever: calculate vaers covid death rate under reporting to project vaers vax death rate under reporting
Ty and wow: “A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic.”
Two things:
- Whatever treatments were given should be on your records. When you feel up to it perhaps do some DD.
- I’m a huge believer in stretching (not yoga because that’s actually a religious practice) but similar movements. Physical therapists can help if initial program too much
You’re falling for their trap. When have they ever done this when creating fear over covid? I agree I’m principle but in practice I don’t think it’s necessary: they’ve asserted an issue exists using method X so therefore we should be able to use method X to dismiss.
Medicare info. Just realized i forgot to post source. I think many have seen this already. My main point was the ah hah moment about the maths.
Yeah it’s not a 5x because that population has a higher mortality generally. Though the existing ~30k VAERS are in addition to these numbers (post 14 day). So, overall projection of ~200k off 200mm —> 0.1%. Now it might be 0.05% … okay so what that’s still insane
Yes they also happened. They jacked the numbers.