Comments (19)
sorted by:
Megascandal 12 points ago +12 / -0

Deadlier. There is no financial incentive to report injection deaths, there is huge financial incentive to report anything, and not just false positives, as covid.

sharks_n_colorado 6 points ago +6 / -0

Official sauce?

newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Looks like it’s from a speech by Thomas Renz. Same guy who just got his law license and has lost about every lawsuit that’s been filing, and losing, COVID-restriction suits.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhggg. My now former best friend for half my life took the shot and flipped a total 180. I don't care if someone chooses the shot, I care if they refuse to listen to evidence proving the intentions behind all this. I tried shooting him a bit of info, and he began treating me like I'm not a human being. Promptly cancelled my vacation plans to visit him, and went out to see my mom instead.

BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +2 / -0

Source, and wtf is cms?

KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just added above

BlackDay2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their usual argument against this would be that these people might've died anyway. How do we know the vaccine increases the odds of death over and above existing causes?

We could try to answer that by looking at the death rate in vaccinated vs unvaccinated groups split by age groups and comorbidities over time, and if deaths tend to clump during the 2 weeks after vaccination in the vaccinated group etc. I highly doubt we'll see that.

Other vaccines have been pulled for far less damage. One good thing is at least people are waking up to the extent of subversion/infiltration that exists in our world.

KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re falling for their trap. When have they ever done this when creating fear over covid? I agree I’m principle but in practice I don’t think it’s necessary: they’ve asserted an issue exists using method X so therefore we should be able to use method X to dismiss.

BlackDay2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. They only seem to need sentiments and rhetoric to get their way, and only our "side" tries to argue in the "proper" manner with facts and logic, and we still don't win.

icockmyglock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your post would be more effective if it compared covid death rate for the same period. As it isn't really impactful.

KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve given you a piece the picture. Feel free to help fill in the gaps. You shouldn’t need corresponding timelines since IFR should generalize across time for similar strains / cohorts.

Turbotron 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched this and the data is of Medicaid people of which the presenter said was something like 20% of americans. He was hesitant to simply say multiply these numbers by 5 to have an idea of the true scale could be but he didn't say it was invalid to think about those implications.

Phoenix_Eagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched this (....)

Hey could you share the source?

KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah it’s not a 5x because that population has a higher mortality generally. Though the existing ~30k VAERS are in addition to these numbers (post 14 day). So, overall projection of ~200k off 200mm —> 0.1%. Now it might be 0.05% … okay so what that’s still insane

arjunas1 1 point ago +1 / -0

what is cms data?

KiloRomeo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Medicare info. Just realized i forgot to post source. I think many have seen this already. My main point was the ah hah moment about the maths.


deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
Mrexreturns -1 points ago +1 / -2

Vax and Covid were both 1% or maybe less.

You will see the upcoming Final Solution lockdowns ordered by mr. Tedros soon.

20% of all Americans, 40% of Australians and 20 - 40 percent of anything else dead.