^^ this guy gets it.

As Nietzsche said in his Genealogy of morals ‘Christianity is the Jews revenge’

What makes you think that the Old Testament has ‘jack shit’ to do with Christ?

And to you too

Neither. I believe there’s a god, an ultimate source of all things and don’t believe in evolution or the Big Bang etc. I just don’t believe in the god of Israel as the one true god - by whatever name you want to call him (allah, el, Yahweh, Jehovah, hachem etc)

In fact, there were multiple Gods weren’t there, until they were mostly deleted at the command of the lord god of Israel, via methods such as the subversion of Rome through Christianity, as a continuation of the Jewish-Roman war.

I believe the lord god of Israel to be a powerful belligerent in the war for the global conquest of the worlds souls but not that he is the good guy.

I think he’s a bad guy, robbing the nations of their own gods, making his people feed off of the fruits of others labour, threatening to lay waste to the nations that do not serve his people, encouraging the slaughter of children and raping of women, engaging in subversive trickery in order to deceive the world into becoming willing but ignorant slaves of his people etc

“Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, declares the Lord GOD, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?”

Well, first, let’s just acknowledge that this guy is the Lord God of Israel, not of all humanity.

Secondly, the lord god of Israel does take pleasure in death and rape and the slaughter of children:

Isa 13:13  Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the LORD of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger. Isa 13:14  And it shall be as the chased roe, and as a sheep that no man taketh up: they shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land. Isa 13:15  Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. Isa 13:16  Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished. Isa 13:17  Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, which shall not regard silver; and as for gold, they shall not delight in it. Isa 13:18  Their bows also shall dash the young men to pieces; and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eye shall not spare children.

That’s retarded hypocritical nonsense dressed up to sound like a pearl of wisdom.

Not really. There wasn’t a guy who was the incarnation of god who walked on water and sacrificed himself to himself so that people could be forgiven their sins.

That’s just a retarded Jewish lie and the means by which they conquered Rome

You have neglected to acknowledge the part where Jesus affirmed himself as a Jew when talking to the Samaritan woman when he tells her

Jhn 4:22  Ye worship ye know not what: we (meaning Jews) know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

Also, Revelation don’t call out the Jews as the synagogue of Satan. It calls out Jews who say they are Jews but are not. There’s a huge distinction here. It is NOT saying that Jews are the synagogue of Satan. It is saying that fake, impostor Jews are. By implication, the ‘Real Jews’ must presumably still be gods chosen people and are simply the victim of some horrid identity theft. The perennial victim again.

This is an error that so many people make when reading this part of Revelation. It’s understandable but a more careful reading should make this nuance stand out pretty clearly.

I’m afraid this is woefully inadequate as an argument in support of the proposition

If Jesus was a Gentile and not a Jew then why, in his conversation with the Samaritan woman in John 4:1-45 does he acknowledge himself as a Jew? Why didn’t he correct the Samaritan woman when she termed him a Jew (John 4:9)?

Why did he then go on to reference himself as a Jew in John 4:22?

You say that the so-called original Jews are not gone and in their place stands an impostor.

What is your reason for believing that’s there were separate, original Jews who are now gone? And, were that so, then how do you account for Jesus stating that salvation was of the Jews? False messiah? Simply defeated? Simple error?

Can you expand on that?

Didn’t Jesus say to the woman of Samaria that ‘you don’t know what you worship. We (Jews) know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews’?

Didn’t Jesus instruct his disciples to stay out of the way of the goyim and to only seek out the lost children of the house of Israel?

Where in the Bible or history does the ‘modern day Jew’ (as you put it) depart from the biblical Jews that Jesus and the whole Bible deem to be the chosen children of the god of Israel?

Nobody’s fool

You’ve exposed yourself as a fool.

In other words you can’t even provide rudimentary support to some of your fundamental opinions about the nature of your professed faith.

I wonder if you even spotted the contradictions in your last couple of posts here.

And how did you determine that that is the criteria for Jewishness?

I’ve read all the papers, know lots of the tactics.

You’ve worked for the US Government hmm and now you’re on a Conspiracy board?

Cass Sunsteins paper advised government to infiltrate and hijack the places where conspiracy theories are discussed in order to slide Conspiracy-minded people into supporting the actions and plans of government beyond their conscious awareness.

He commented on what he called the ‘self-sealing’ nature of conspiracy theories and the tendency to gatekeep and marshall the herd through the type of accusations you make in order to keep the followers within strict parameter's of thought and opinion etc. and here you are, doing just as he advised. In response to what? Some guy pointing out that there’s missing context that might affect the tenor of a particular topic?

Mmmm. You’re the fed.l

You’re simply trying to take advantage of the self-sealing quality as explained in Cass Sunsteins paper ‘Conspiracy Theories: Their Causes and Cure’

You’re the fed

No, you’ve found a guy exercising reason.

Without the full context, you only know one side of a story.

Would this interaction make more sense if her Facebook post was calling for people to take to the streets and behead Jewish people, rape Jewish women and kill Jewish children?

Would it make more sense if she just posted a Palestinian flag and said I stand with Palestine?

Those are not equal propositions.

No one thinks the police should be out patrolling opinions on social media but ‘found the fed’ is just a completely imbecilic smear on someone’s reasonable enquiry.

He’s probably referring to a genetic tendency to lie and to engineer genocide and degeneracy

So you would agree that Jews are gods special people then and that the verse from Revelation you quoted only admonishes people who are pretend Jews rather than Jews themselves?

Further, you accept Jesus’ saying that salvation is of the Jews?

Further still, you accept that Jesus had not come to abolish the law or the prophets but to fulfill? In which case, the prophecy of Isaiah which states that the nations that do not serve Israel shall be utterly wasted is one you look forward to (although in your case Israel excluded Zionists and the non-orthodox, but you still agree that the nations should serve Israel or face being utterly wasted)?

So who are the real Jews then?

No, just biblically literate

Ok, so who are the real Jews then? Who is the real Israel?

That’s not naming the Jews. That’s naming people are NOT Jewish but pretend to be.

Jesus said ‘salvation is of the Jews’ And analogised the Canaanite woman to a dog in comparison with the children of god the Jews

The god of this world hates your guts though and, if you believe in the god of the Bible, has predestined you to be an obedient slave to Jews - which you can see Manifest in multiple ways