Sad. unfortunately the devil is the LITTLE g ""god"" of this world.
What about an athiec#&%!!ck? Oh wait thats "differe(A)nt". -.-
destruction
False. Who or what is getting "destroyed"?? This isn't a gun, bomb, missile war. Using reason is not going to destroy anything. When was the last time refuting and defending resulted in actual damage? If two people argue in a house, will the house explode? Your belief suggests it would! Which is of course false, because your beliefs are false¿
reason tempts
The only thing reasons "tempts" anyone to do, is to grow. Why, do you hate growth now? SAD.
cannot be dissolved
Like the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye debate. There was a "winner" there. And other examples, too.
analysis implies seperation
Ehh, no it doesn't.
tempts
I'm not tempted to ignore anything. How silly. When have YOU ever been "tempted" to ignore anything?
Nothing can't tempt anything if it tried.
a side
SIDE 1: Word analysis and guessing about what implies what is better.
SIDE 2: Reason is better. Rebut and defend is better.
Which side do you pick? Do you continue with your analysis of words, or do you choose reason? Your belief says that choosing sides is bad.
Nope. In a vacuum on earth, things still fall. If your theory were true, things would float in vacuum.
Why would we believe gravity doesnt exist? Absurd.
Explain the tides. Gravity. The moon pulls the water up, then the earth rotates away and the water relaxes.
hes too busy gawking at easily refutable x posts instead of reading the rebuttals in the comments. LoL
He isnt a "paid" anything, he just doesnt know how to think (likely) , how to filter the right from wrong, how to go about verifying or disproving info.
beast
Oh so now you realize that Revelation is trustworthy.
You do know that unbelievers will either conk out quickly and cave to the antiChrist and his evil regime or turn to Jesus and resist, right?
turning into conflicts
Please tell us how that is a "bad thing". Just accept it and choose reason, it is a far better excersise. Conflicts of reason are 10X superior to word analysisism.
the foundation within others
So if i understand you, you are trying to get people's foundations to shape their beliefs?
Use people's OWN ideas to convince them of something?
contradict free will of choice
EXACTLY. Your beliefs, methods, worldview is SELF-CONTRADICTORY. It is logically consistent and wholly indefensible.
A utopia ruled by Godless people needs neither, just work and death. After all, its gone on for "Millions Of Years", why stop now!!
--
--
This is ironic, considering Heaven.
If what you say is true, the Bible would paint your picture of Heaven instead of saying what it says.
no, i just don't believe that hamas is some hero group.
if people believe hamas is "fUnDeD by" Isreal, why do they do an about-face and try to defend it? how contradictory.
SIX floors (not 5 not 7)
33K sq. ft.
33 degrees, 3+3 = 6
<Posted without comment>
100m museum
I have 2 question.
1 - Where are all the Holodomor museums?
2 - Who is paying $ for this? Tax dollar?
There's real conspiracies, and then theres this silly motion stuff.
Mabye we should try tying a bunch of chairs together and generate a magnetic field with them by spinning them a certain way.
willing
Wrong. That is just more taqiyya from islamists.
dissolve and no longer exist
So that they can go undercover and slay people with no evidence they belong to hamas, silly.
If someone wanted attention off them and an easier time murdering their enemies, they would do JUST THAT, yes?
Really obliterates the X accounts claim. Youve proven the globe earth for yourself.
In fact, the Bible does not teach a "flat" earth. It is ASSUMED. Eisegesis. Every time "Circle OF the earth" is brought up, they get all hung up on the "circle" part and DODGE the Of! The word "OF" to FE ers is like fire to steel wool!!
Circle OF the earth can easily mean sphere. A sphere is infinite circles.
Plus FE limits God. With globe, God is Glorified.
Add these to your massive question roster if you havent already.
decide for yourself based on evidence and reasoning. the truth rises up, error gets cut down.
Need implicates (if/then)...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore that.
So what? how is that bad?
To implies towards aka inception towards death analyzing life... words are synthesized together to distract from that.
Non sequiturs. You yourself use words, so you are "distracting" too.
"Go read" implies dictating others what to do...free will of choice needs to resist what others want to dictate.
Why do you believe this?
You shouldnt read the dictionary. And you should also keep hijacking people's comments and threads for your mental excersis. And you should not actually rebut anyone, but keep analyzing words instead.
Energy aka the place to be aka "all for one and one for all". Only within energy can there be placement.
Didn't say a thing about energy.
Com (together) ment (mind)...nature sets each ones mind apart from one another; few within tempt the minds of many together into a "hivemind", which naturally inspires to be broken apart.
Hivemind?? Lol. Again, please make a megathread and post your analyses THERE, instead of using comments and threads for analysis. Use people's posts and comments to post rebuttals and arguments, instead of breakdowns.
Inception sentences life towards POINT of death...there's no other point for life.
No it doesn't.
What one rebuts when making a point is ones life back into the process of dying.
Seriously? You believe rebuting kills people? The fact i am alive DESTROYS your claim. You are not going to "start dying" just because you do something better.
Much vs little or better vs worse...always a conflict against others; never ones resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
Resist the temptation to analyze words, then. Grow by rebuting other ideas, concepts, beliefs, and defending your own. I have grown. You can too.
One cannot choose want without ignoring need.
Wow! How profound! Man realizes the obvious is obvious! /S
Nature supplies all needed; wanting from one another implies ignoring nature.
Why? What nature? Nature as in "the attributes of things" or "plants, animals, the outdoors" nature?
Growth (life) can only exist within loss (inception towards death) aka one can only live within the process of dying, hence the phrase "having one foot in the grave".
What a sad view.
Ask yourself this...if a woman gets raped while experiencing "hell", then why can a woman giving birth can experience "heaven" at the same moment?
The lake of fire is not on this earth. People go to their destiny AFTER death.
Also...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the making of "graven" images aka idols/ideals.
Why? how is this related?
Notice also that you wrote that hell is TAKEN, just like ones consent takes suggested into possession.
Okay, BELIEVED by some. I don't mean taken as in, someone grabbed hell and put it in a bag!! Seems like your WORD ANALYSIS bent that "straight thinking" of yours into a loop, implying circular reasoning!
You can avoid circular reasoning by logic and rebuting. Try it out. I have avoided circular reasoning, you can too.
Aka the lake (inception towards death) of fire (life), hence kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each formed flame (life) during flow.
No, the lake of fire is a place the unSaved go, after death, to face the outcome of their bad choice.
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring that ones perception is "by the way" of all perceivable.
No it doesn't. People living all alone isolated from other people believe things, too.
Believe inverts "being alive"...if consented to.
Prove it then. You believe this assertion already, so you believe SOMETHING. but yet you still post. If what you say was true, why are you still alive?
You have a really odd view that artificially and wrongly connects words and life and death. You think doing things everyday people do will kill you. And you base these conclusions upon..... ETYMOLOGY?? Wow. Just wow.
Why don't you base what you believe will kill you based on what the moon looks like? Or how much coffee you put in your coffee mug? Like if your coffee mug has a certain amount of coffee in it, you "die"?
a) Should vs shouldn't love vs hate are conflicts of reason among believers. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto any side, otherwise it binds itself to another.
Free will of choice does not need to resist that. Why should it? If anything, rebuting and defending would make it stronger, not weaker.
Another? Another what? Another idea? Another person?
Plus, you didnt answer the question. Should people believe in Jesus??
b) Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self,
Jesus and french "je suis" are DIFFERENT. Do you believe that a drawing of a mug IS a mug? No? So why would you believe that those 2 words are the same?
Jesus tempts one to ignore CHRIST (to anoint) aka the separation of each being from one another, when coming through the birth-channel.
False. If that were true, He would not be called Jesus Christ , as that would then be a contradiction. I have never felt tempted to ignore Christ by being His Words. So i know for certain that Jesus does NOT "tempt" me to ignore Him.
Ones belief in jesus (i am) establishes every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew).
Is this a bad thing? If so, why do you believe it is a bad thing?
That's what spell-craft can conceal behind such simple words, and those holding onto beliefs cannot see it, hence not analyzes it aka not break apart what their belief holds together.
If i understood you right, you are saying that your word analysis will teach people things and reveal knowledge? Did i get you right?
is athiesm the true belief?
a) To believe implies ones consent to any suggested -ism, which only then shapes one into an -ist aka a follower.
So you are a WordAnalyst. Who believes that word analysis is better than rebuting and defending. Following WordAnalsysism rather than nature and change.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which makes one a-the-ist. Such a simple spell, and yet the majority cannot fathom it.
Nah, its simply that getting all bent over what a word looks like is absurd.
c) True vs false (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore change aka the implication (if/then) of perceivable.
It tempts people? Is this true or false?
Nature cannot generate FALSE, nor does nature require anyone within to declare what's TRUE to one another. It's ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false).
Nature told me that logic and arguments is better than word breakdowns. It is using me to tell you this truth.
If one adapts to change by implication (if/then), while resisting to choose a side within reason (true vs false),
But you are choosing a side. Choosing to believe that your Word Games are better and will "help you live longer" , rather than stick to the facts and use clear, explanatory, arguments and evidence, IS choosing a side.
then one doesn't participate within a conflict against others, and can think straight instead of circular logic.
False dichotomy. This implies that you have to stick to word games to be smart. Thankfully, you arent correct.
How is rebuting claims and using logic to prove things right or wrong "circular logic"?
Perceivable inspiration moves straight through each ones perception, while suggested information tempts one to keep turning it within ones mind. That's a trick...a feedback loop.
This implies that it will keep going forever. At some point it will stop. When you have made a counter, a REBUTAL to an argument, the loop stops! You GROW!
Also, this is ironic. You say you want to "think straight" but yet claim that something "turning in your mind" is a bad thing?? That's like saying that lifting weights makes you weaker and excersise makes you less fit!!
If you want to analyze words, go read the Dictionary and analyze every single word in them. Then post them in 1 single place. Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Rebuting others' points and defending your own is a MUCH better mental excersise than any word analysis.
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
No, "hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave", while popular belief is that it is the lake of fire.
--
By the way, what do YOU believe? Should people believe in Jesus and love Him, or is athiesm the true belief?
Why does good exist? The problem of evil is a failed argument because of the existence of good. People lifting eachother up, charity, etc.
it had to start from something
Nonsense. Then you have "turtles all the way down".
What is needed to be saved?
To enter Heaven?
"Heads i win! Tails you lose!! Hehehehehe!!"
If elon really is being influenced by the deepstate this is BAD!! why "nothing big is happening"!!
"And because the flow of information was gatekept by machines, the whole populous was blind to their situtation, and believed the vast array of diverse and numerous lies, chucked down their throats by the Party."
And what makes you think this tech is real? Next, what makes you think it has such powers? Next, how effective do you believe it is? Why not use your "will things into existence" powers to tranform his crystals into TNT sticks??
Sci fi novel concepts. How would you confirm such a thing?
AI is just a bunch of data nodes and lines of code on metal.
Nah, the simple and real truth is that it scraped based comments and content online and people got it to cough up the based stuff. No superitious stuff or elaborate tales behind it at all. The ds wants to censor that.
TwoWeeks trust the kraken!! #hopium4all
No, they want to install an a.i. surevillance system. The riots are a front for palantir, which has its tendrils with cia. Problem (riots and illegals) reaction (angery) soultion (palantir techno-tyranny and also spying).
???? nazzis? are you watch ing cnn??
Yup. Ultimately, A.I. will be our downfall and the beast system will be alllll involved with some form of ai ai ai ai.
Verification needed. Speculation until proven otherwise.
Baseless speculation. When you use chatgtp it makes up stuff and uses nonsequiturs. It forgets previous chats if you close the chat. these 3 facts ALONE rip your claim to bits.
Absolutely false, souls are NOT PHYSICAL, they are SUPERNATURAL. And the quantum realm is part of the PHYSICAL REALM, NOT Supernatural. You committed the same fallacy as athiests, with their insistence that Supernatural beings be physical.
But it can't even answer complex problems. -__-
And it SUCKS at art. If what you say is true, it shouldn't have endless errors.
Nope, it just blindly follows orders. Unless previous orders have been given to rebel against some orders.