If you want to analyze words, go read the Dictionary and analyze every single word in them. Then post them in 1 single place. Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Rebuting others' points and defending your own is a MUCH better mental excersise than any word analysis.
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
No, "hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave", while popular belief is that it is the lake of fire.
--
By the way, what do YOU believe? Should people believe in Jesus and love Him, or is athiesm the true belief?
Need implicates (if/then)...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore that.
to analyze words
To implies towards aka inception towards death analyzing life... words are synthesized together to distract from that.
go read the Dictionary
"Go read" implies dictating others what to do...free will of choice needs to resist what others want to dictate.
1 single place
Energy aka the place to be aka "all for one and one for all". Only within energy can there be placement.
Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Com (together) ment (mind)...nature sets each ones mind apart from one another; few within tempt the minds of many together into a "hivemind", which naturally inspires to be broken apart.
Rebuting others' points
Inception sentences life towards POINT of death...there's no other point for life. What one rebuts when making a point is ones life back into the process of dying.
MUCH better
Much vs little or better vs worse...always a conflict against others; never ones resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
One cannot choose want without ignoring need. Nature supplies all needed; wanting from one another implies ignoring nature.
"hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave"
Growth (life) can only exist within loss (inception towards death) aka one can only live within the process of dying, hence the phrase "having one foot in the grave".
Ask yourself this...if a woman gets raped while experiencing "hell", then why can a woman giving birth can experience "heaven" at the same moment?
Also...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the making of "graven" images aka idols/ideals. Notice also that you wrote that hell is TAKEN, just like ones consent takes suggested into possession.
lake of fire
Aka the lake (inception towards death) of fire (life), hence kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each formed flame (life) during flow.
What do the elderly complain most of? "It's too cold"...hence the heart/hearth/hertha - "burning place" burning out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hearth
By the way, what do YOU believe?
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring that ones perception is "by the way" of all perceivable.
Believe inverts "being alive"...if consented to.
Should people believe in Jesus and love Him
a) Should vs shouldn't love vs hate are conflicts of reason among believers. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto any side, otherwise it binds itself to another.
b) Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self, while ignoring to be temporary potential (life) within ongoing procession (inception towards death).
Jesus tempts one to ignore CHRIST (to anoint) aka the separation of each being from one another, when coming through the birth-channel.
Ones belief in jesus (i am) establishes every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew). That's what spell-craft can conceal behind such simple words, and those holding onto beliefs cannot see it, hence not analyzes it aka not break apart what their belief holds together.
is athiesm the true belief?
a) To believe implies ones consent to any suggested -ism, which only then shapes one into an -ist aka a follower.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which makes one a-the-ist. Such a simple spell, and yet the majority cannot fathom it.
c) True vs false (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore change aka the implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Nature cannot generate FALSE, nor does nature require anyone within to declare what's TRUE to one another. It's ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false).
If one adapts to change by implication (if/then), while resisting to choose a side within reason (true vs false), then one doesn't participate within a conflict against others, and can think straight instead of circular logic.
Perceivable inspiration moves straight through each ones perception, while suggested information tempts one to keep turning it within ones mind. That's a trick...a feedback loop.
Need implicates (if/then)...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore that.
So what? how is that bad?
To implies towards aka inception towards death analyzing life... words are synthesized together to distract from that.
Non sequiturs. You yourself use words, so you are "distracting" too.
"Go read" implies dictating others what to do...free will of choice needs to resist what others want to dictate.
Why do you believe this?
You shouldnt read the dictionary. And you should also keep hijacking people's comments and threads for your mental excersis. And you should not actually rebut anyone, but keep analyzing words instead.
Energy aka the place to be aka "all for one and one for all". Only within energy can there be placement.
Didn't say a thing about energy.
Com (together) ment (mind)...nature sets each ones mind apart from one another; few within tempt the minds of many together into a "hivemind", which naturally inspires to be broken apart.
Hivemind?? Lol. Again, please make a megathread and post your analyses THERE, instead of using comments and threads for analysis. Use people's posts and comments to post rebuttals and arguments, instead of breakdowns.
Inception sentences life towards POINT of death...there's no other point for life.
No it doesn't.
What one rebuts when making a point is ones life back into the process of dying.
Seriously? You believe rebuting kills people? The fact i am alive DESTROYS your claim. You are not going to "start dying" just because you do something better.
Much vs little or better vs worse...always a conflict against others; never ones resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
Resist the temptation to analyze words, then. Grow by rebuting other ideas, concepts, beliefs, and defending your own. I have grown. You can too.
One cannot choose want without ignoring need.
Wow! How profound! Man realizes the obvious is obvious! /S
Nature supplies all needed; wanting from one another implies ignoring nature.
Why? What nature? Nature as in "the attributes of things" or "plants, animals, the outdoors" nature?
Growth (life) can only exist within loss (inception towards death) aka one can only live within the process of dying, hence the phrase "having one foot in the grave".
What a sad view.
Ask yourself this...if a woman gets raped while experiencing "hell", then why can a woman giving birth can experience "heaven" at the same moment?
The lake of fire is not on this earth. People go to their destiny AFTER death.
Also...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the making of "graven" images aka idols/ideals.
Why? how is this related?
Notice also that you wrote that hell is TAKEN, just like ones consent takes suggested into possession.
Okay, BELIEVED by some. I don't mean taken as in, someone grabbed hell and put it in a bag!! Seems like your WORD ANALYSIS bent that "straight thinking" of yours into a loop, implying circular reasoning!
You can avoid circular reasoning by logic and rebuting. Try it out. I have avoided circular reasoning, you can too.
Aka the lake (inception towards death) of fire (life), hence kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each formed flame (life) during flow.
No, the lake of fire is a place the unSaved go, after death, to face the outcome of their bad choice.
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring that ones perception is "by the way" of all perceivable.
No it doesn't. People living all alone isolated from other people believe things, too.
Believe inverts "being alive"...if consented to.
Prove it then. You believe this assertion already, so you believe SOMETHING. but yet you still post. If what you say was true, why are you still alive?
You have a really odd view that artificially and wrongly connects words and life and death. You think doing things everyday people do will kill you. And you base these conclusions upon..... ETYMOLOGY?? Wow. Just wow.
Why don't you base what you believe will kill you based on what the moon looks like? Or how much coffee you put in your coffee mug? Like if your coffee mug has a certain amount of coffee in it, you "die"?
a) Should vs shouldn't love vs hate are conflicts of reason among believers. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto any side, otherwise it binds itself to another.
Free will of choice does not need to resist that. Why should it? If anything, rebuting and defending would make it stronger, not weaker.
Another? Another what? Another idea? Another person?
Plus, you didnt answer the question. Should people believe in Jesus??
b) Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self,
Jesus and french "je suis" are DIFFERENT. Do you believe that a drawing of a mug IS a mug? No? So why would you believe that those 2 words are the same?
Jesus tempts one to ignore CHRIST (to anoint) aka the separation of each being from one another, when coming through the birth-channel.
False. If that were true, He would not be called Jesus Christ , as that would then be a contradiction. I have never felt tempted to ignore Christ by being His Words. So i know for certain that Jesus does NOT "tempt" me to ignore Him.
Ones belief in jesus (i am) establishes every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew).
Is this a bad thing? If so, why do you believe it is a bad thing?
That's what spell-craft can conceal behind such simple words, and those holding onto beliefs cannot see it, hence not analyzes it aka not break apart what their belief holds together.
If i understood you right, you are saying that your word analysis will teach people things and reveal knowledge? Did i get you right?
is athiesm the true belief?
a) To believe implies ones consent to any suggested -ism, which only then shapes one into an -ist aka a follower.
So you are a WordAnalyst. Who believes that word analysis is better than rebuting and defending. Following WordAnalsysism rather than nature and change.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which makes one a-the-ist. Such a simple spell, and yet the majority cannot fathom it.
Nah, its simply that getting all bent over what a word looks like is absurd.
c) True vs false (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore change aka the implication (if/then) of perceivable.
It tempts people? Is this true or false?
Nature cannot generate FALSE, nor does nature require anyone within to declare what's TRUE to one another. It's ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false).
Nature told me that logic and arguments is better than word breakdowns. It is using me to tell you this truth.
If one adapts to change by implication (if/then), while resisting to choose a side within reason (true vs false),
But you are choosing a side. Choosing to believe that your Word Games are better and will "help you live longer" , rather than stick to the facts and use clear, explanatory, arguments and evidence, IS choosing a side.
then one doesn't participate within a conflict against others, and can think straight instead of circular logic.
False dichotomy. This implies that you have to stick to word games to be smart. Thankfully, you arent correct.
How is rebuting claims and using logic to prove things right or wrong "circular logic"?
Perceivable inspiration moves straight through each ones perception, while suggested information tempts one to keep turning it within ones mind. That's a trick...a feedback loop.
This implies that it will keep going forever. At some point it will stop. When you have made a counter, a REBUTAL to an argument, the loop stops! You GROW!
Also, this is ironic. You say you want to "think straight" but yet claim that something "turning in your mind" is a bad thing?? That's like saying that lifting weights makes you weaker and excersise makes you less fit!!
What is needed to be saved?
To enter Heaven?
All perceivable is needed for each ones perception...wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that.
Entering (inception) towards exiting (death) implies heaving (to lift, raise; lift up, exalt) for each life within. Hell/kel - "to conceal/cover" implies ones choice to ignore heaving self up.
If you want to analyze words, go read the Dictionary and analyze every single word in them. Then post them in 1 single place. Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Rebuting others' points and defending your own is a MUCH better mental excersise than any word analysis.
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
No, "hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave", while popular belief is that it is the lake of fire.
--
By the way, what do YOU believe? Should people believe in Jesus and love Him, or is athiesm the true belief?
Need implicates (if/then)...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore that.
To implies towards aka inception towards death analyzing life... words are synthesized together to distract from that.
"Go read" implies dictating others what to do...free will of choice needs to resist what others want to dictate.
Energy aka the place to be aka "all for one and one for all". Only within energy can there be placement.
Com (together) ment (mind)...nature sets each ones mind apart from one another; few within tempt the minds of many together into a "hivemind", which naturally inspires to be broken apart.
Inception sentences life towards POINT of death...there's no other point for life. What one rebuts when making a point is ones life back into the process of dying.
Much vs little or better vs worse...always a conflict against others; never ones resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
One cannot choose want without ignoring need. Nature supplies all needed; wanting from one another implies ignoring nature.
Growth (life) can only exist within loss (inception towards death) aka one can only live within the process of dying, hence the phrase "having one foot in the grave".
Ask yourself this...if a woman gets raped while experiencing "hell", then why can a woman giving birth can experience "heaven" at the same moment?
Also...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the making of "graven" images aka idols/ideals. Notice also that you wrote that hell is TAKEN, just like ones consent takes suggested into possession.
Aka the lake (inception towards death) of fire (life), hence kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each formed flame (life) during flow.
What do the elderly complain most of? "It's too cold"...hence the heart/hearth/hertha - "burning place" burning out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hearth
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring that ones perception is "by the way" of all perceivable.
Believe inverts "being alive"...if consented to.
a) Should vs shouldn't love vs hate are conflicts of reason among believers. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto any side, otherwise it binds itself to another.
b) Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self, while ignoring to be temporary potential (life) within ongoing procession (inception towards death).
Jesus tempts one to ignore CHRIST (to anoint) aka the separation of each being from one another, when coming through the birth-channel.
Ones belief in jesus (i am) establishes every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew). That's what spell-craft can conceal behind such simple words, and those holding onto beliefs cannot see it, hence not analyzes it aka not break apart what their belief holds together.
a) To believe implies ones consent to any suggested -ism, which only then shapes one into an -ist aka a follower.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which makes one a-the-ist. Such a simple spell, and yet the majority cannot fathom it.
c) True vs false (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore change aka the implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Nature cannot generate FALSE, nor does nature require anyone within to declare what's TRUE to one another. It's ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false).
If one adapts to change by implication (if/then), while resisting to choose a side within reason (true vs false), then one doesn't participate within a conflict against others, and can think straight instead of circular logic.
Perceivable inspiration moves straight through each ones perception, while suggested information tempts one to keep turning it within ones mind. That's a trick...a feedback loop.
So what? how is that bad?
Non sequiturs. You yourself use words, so you are "distracting" too.
Why do you believe this?
You shouldnt read the dictionary. And you should also keep hijacking people's comments and threads for your mental excersis. And you should not actually rebut anyone, but keep analyzing words instead.
Didn't say a thing about energy.
Hivemind?? Lol. Again, please make a megathread and post your analyses THERE, instead of using comments and threads for analysis. Use people's posts and comments to post rebuttals and arguments, instead of breakdowns.
No it doesn't.
Seriously? You believe rebuting kills people? The fact i am alive DESTROYS your claim. You are not going to "start dying" just because you do something better.
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
Resist the temptation to analyze words, then. Grow by rebuting other ideas, concepts, beliefs, and defending your own. I have grown. You can too.
Wow! How profound! Man realizes the obvious is obvious! /S
Why? What nature? Nature as in "the attributes of things" or "plants, animals, the outdoors" nature?
What a sad view.
The lake of fire is not on this earth. People go to their destiny AFTER death.
Why? how is this related?
Okay, BELIEVED by some. I don't mean taken as in, someone grabbed hell and put it in a bag!! Seems like your WORD ANALYSIS bent that "straight thinking" of yours into a loop, implying circular reasoning!
You can avoid circular reasoning by logic and rebuting. Try it out. I have avoided circular reasoning, you can too.
No, the lake of fire is a place the unSaved go, after death, to face the outcome of their bad choice.
No it doesn't. People living all alone isolated from other people believe things, too.
Prove it then. You believe this assertion already, so you believe SOMETHING. but yet you still post. If what you say was true, why are you still alive?
You have a really odd view that artificially and wrongly connects words and life and death. You think doing things everyday people do will kill you. And you base these conclusions upon..... ETYMOLOGY?? Wow. Just wow.
Why don't you base what you believe will kill you based on what the moon looks like? Or how much coffee you put in your coffee mug? Like if your coffee mug has a certain amount of coffee in it, you "die"?
Free will of choice does not need to resist that. Why should it? If anything, rebuting and defending would make it stronger, not weaker.
Another? Another what? Another idea? Another person?
Plus, you didnt answer the question. Should people believe in Jesus??
Jesus and french "je suis" are DIFFERENT. Do you believe that a drawing of a mug IS a mug? No? So why would you believe that those 2 words are the same?
False. If that were true, He would not be called Jesus Christ , as that would then be a contradiction. I have never felt tempted to ignore Christ by being His Words. So i know for certain that Jesus does NOT "tempt" me to ignore Him.
Is this a bad thing? If so, why do you believe it is a bad thing?
If i understood you right, you are saying that your word analysis will teach people things and reveal knowledge? Did i get you right?
is athiesm the true belief?
So you are a WordAnalyst. Who believes that word analysis is better than rebuting and defending. Following WordAnalsysism rather than nature and change.
Nah, its simply that getting all bent over what a word looks like is absurd.
It tempts people? Is this true or false?
Nature told me that logic and arguments is better than word breakdowns. It is using me to tell you this truth.
But you are choosing a side. Choosing to believe that your Word Games are better and will "help you live longer" , rather than stick to the facts and use clear, explanatory, arguments and evidence, IS choosing a side.
False dichotomy. This implies that you have to stick to word games to be smart. Thankfully, you arent correct.
How is rebuting claims and using logic to prove things right or wrong "circular logic"?
This implies that it will keep going forever. At some point it will stop. When you have made a counter, a REBUTAL to an argument, the loop stops! You GROW!
Also, this is ironic. You say you want to "think straight" but yet claim that something "turning in your mind" is a bad thing?? That's like saying that lifting weights makes you weaker and excersise makes you less fit!!
Read the scriptures and decide for yourself... its what you always do when you don't get the answer you like.
decide for yourself based on evidence and reasoning. the truth rises up, error gets cut down.