▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Luther was big on bashing them. Wdym??

iconoclasm bad

How?

idolize a Book

How so? Is idolizing men and dead people any better? If a catholic family member dies can you ask them for 400 gorillion things too?

Church

The Church refers to THE WHOLE Body of Christ. ALL Saved people are a part of the Church. By the Biblical definition, most self proclaimed catholics are ironically and sadly not part of the Church.

And no, the Bible was 'given to us' by Godly men. Not people who thought Mary was made sinless.

Are Saints:

A. Specific and special people according to men

B. All Saved Believers

own interpretations

What one is most consistent with the rest of the Bible? Whatever evidence most supports an interpretation? That interpretation is likelist to be true. Humans are irrational and silly and blinded by sin rather than logical so ofc they won't know this.

man made

Like purgatory?

pride

Don't catholics also have this issue, what with the "WE are the FIRST Church! WE gave you the Bible! WE are the number 1 authority! WE have the One Single View, and the stupid Lower Caste do NOT!!"

Orthodox claim to be First, too.

Remember "the first shall be last and the last shall be first"?

Note: Also, very VERY fitting that someone defending catholicism also defends censorship. Pea one, Pea two, meet Pod.

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

What parts are false? Is he digging at catholicism or Christianity? The OP can repeat the exact same 1 liner.

Not saying you're wrong at all

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

All that was was some worthless "challenge". Lots of satire, but little argument. Please retry with a better one.

24 hr rule doesn't apply to unserious/satire-laden comments.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

know what's going on

Like actively? Like 1. they have live feed coming in from cameras?

  1. Or do you mean their knowledge comes from reading the Bible?

If 2. is what you mean, then we know that too.

tech goes that far

Elaboration required.

believe in God

Even the demons believe and tremble. But they choose to reject God willfully.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read my first reply before reading this.

part 2

Say Aunt Sally learns in a dream the recipe for an elixir that preserves her youth. When she wakes up, she scribbles the directions on a scrap of paper, then runs to the kitchen to make up her first glass. In a few days Aunt Sally is transformed into a picture of radiant youth because of her daily dose of “Sally’s Secret Sauce.”

Aunt Sally is so excited she sends detailed, hand-written instructions on how to make the sauce to her three bridge partners (Aunt Sally is still in the technological dark ages—no photocopier or email). They, in turn, make copies for ten of their own friends.

All goes well until one day Aunt Sally’s pet dog eats the original copy of the recipe. In a panic she contacts her three friends who have mysteriously suffered similar mishaps, so the alarm goes out to the others in attempt to recover the original wording.

Sally rounds up all the surviving hand-written copies, twenty-six in all. When she spreads them out on the kitchen table, she immediately notices some differences. Twenty-three of the copies are exactly the same. Of the remaining three, however, one has misspelled words, another has two phrases inverted (“mix then chop” instead of “chop then mix”) and one includes an ingredient none of the others has on its list.

Do you think Aunt Sally can accurately reconstruct her original recipe from this evidence? Of course she can. The misspellings are obvious errors. The single inverted phrase stands out and can easily be repaired. Sally would then strike the extra ingredient reasoning it’s more plausible one person would add an item in error than 25 people would accidentally omit it.

Even if the variations were more numerous or more diverse, the original could still be reconstructed with a high level of confidence if Sally had enough copies.

This, in simplified form, is how scholars do “textual criticism,” an academic method used to test all documents of antiquity, not just religious texts. it’s a careful linguistic process allowing an alert critic to determine the extent of possible corruption of any work.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, bro, only 1 reply to you and you react ultra defensively. Not even 5 comments in! Tell me, are you a coward who runs upon scrutiny of your worldview, or do you have actual defenses for it?

You think you are so right, but I wanna call that into question. Pride is bad.

Let's break this down:

I've read more ORIGINAL bible versions than your two brain cells will ever comprehend.

So you mean you read all the thousands of copies of manuscripts? How you define "original versions" is unclear.

Your lack of human history, belief systems, religions is so dumbfoundedly ignorant it is almost impossible to understand.,

"People made beliefs over time that partially echoed the truth so no faith is legit!!" This is a fallacy.

There are many people defending the Truth that is Christianity. Meanwhile, good luck seeing anyone argue for theose other belief systems!! Scrutiny and logic tends to prune away fake beliefs and leaves true beliefs standing!

For you "history", "world", "god" and belief start with the cheap re-written copy of the Torah c. 300 AD

God is eternal.

Thats what you say, and I believe history and the world started ~6K years ago. Yeah ofc you disagree but feel free to rebut that.

censored by post Roman ruling scholars.

What about the rich man and lazarus? What about "love thy neighbor"? What about Jesus' Kingdom being NOT of this world?? What about the Romans killing the literal Savior?? Given the content in the Bible, The romans musta been stupid morons who left a bunch of stuff to criticise them!! Or, you can admit God inspired people to write the Books of the Bible.

And the Torah is just a re-written censored piece of polytheist beliefs of Judaism c. 700 BC

So you believe it came from polythiesm. But i believe polythiesm came AFTER people knew about the true God. So who is right and why? It makes no sense that people would have a strict trend of reducing number of gods. Humans are rebellious by nature so they would make more gods.

when Judaism was re-written and censored

(/Athiest Argument style/)Give strictly repeatable, observable, testable, science-only, lab grade evidence or youre wrong!!!! (/Athiest Argument style/)

to be a single god monotheistic religion in the worship of YHWH.

If polythiesm was true, there would be conflicts among the "gods".

But you know what: people existed before any of those were invented. Before Moses (copy of a Sumerian story, with name changed) left Egypt (another false story, copied from Sumer).

Did i say otherwise? Nope. Obviously humans existed before books. God created men, then men discovered the ability to write and invented books.

Why do you take a gnostic stance, rather than an agnostic one, on dates of when things were written?

Those people believed in gods (plural), knew languages before Hebrew, were in tribese before a single jew or son of Israel had born, and had a notion of history, cosmology and where we came from.

Yes. Adam and Eve existed before Hebrew and Isreal. None of this proves the Bible wrong.

books older, and less censored than the bibleS (yes, there are hundreds of bible versions, some are so drastically different

Do you know what Textual Criticism is? I will bet you have barely considered HOW we got the Bible and what went into translation. The most accurate one is NASB 1977 and 1995.

If aliens coming to earth in the year 4050 have to translate books promoting u/factdigger 's worldview written in 1995, into THEIR own language, are they out of luck?

they'd blow your mind, if you were intelligent enough to read them).

My rebuttals might make you question your worldview, if you care enough to read them.

Also, I notice you never explained how fallible stupid humans made the Sinless, Perfect God. If God does not exist, we should never be able to conjure attributes higher than ours. We are all there supposedly is, how could we concieve anything higher? All other gods lack Omnipotence, and other religions save by works. Christianity is the only one among the religions that says Faith saves, Faith is a gift from God. Faith is not blind, why would you think it is? It is athiests who believe such.

I have a big ol community full of evidence c/evidencedump.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Invented by who?

Wrong. Human nature prohibits us from making a Sinless, Holy, Just God. We are so flawed and stupid. We like to believe works save us. Read Genesis. Read the Bible. What do you know about Christianity??

The "made up" theory works better on millions years, evolution, abiogenesis, than for Christianity.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mabye it existed in the past, but now doesn't exist because most people don't believe such a thing exists. Once it's gone we can't wish it back.

So you are relying on something that was destroyed by itself a long, long time ago.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the reason the laws of physics are how they are? Why don't they evolve?

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

just go ivermectin+fem + apricot seed. no need for that craziness.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

which god? i don't know what this video is promoting. can you explain for the ones in the back?

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

I said "all of them should be released". You are not just a coward, but stupid too, for calling me a "P3D0 PROTECTER REEEE" when i LITERALLY want the files to be released. Stupidity x Cowarddice, the worst combo! Destructive duo!

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have nothing to say so you hide like a true coward. Your b****k does nothing except create a cult echo chamber.

If you had anything useful, you wouldn't do it.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

In this reply, you are still basing all of your assumptions on the belief that bloomBERG is correct.

Are you sure that bloomberg isn't a deep state tool????

hiding something

Source = Democrat rag

fword off to

Ad hominem.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why, if God exists, does he let so many people live in constant suffering?

Why, if God doesn't exist, do people get cured, or even exist/live at all? why does good and love exist?

Imagine excersise. You hate it and prefer to slack, but stronger muscles and better health, longer life are worth it, yes? Same with suffering in this life. Build up spiritual maturity, keep being Christian thru out life.

Why did He make me a

God made the first two humans. And you & i & everyone are descended from them.

5'3 dark-skinned indian with slight

White people are hated in this world. You may be this way so you have more opportunity without "muh white" being a talking point used on you.

asd and adhd.

Mabye these give you unique abilities and give you certain advantages. Turn them into advantages and pray to Jesus for these to be helpful rather than hurtful.

Also you mention "slight" so it should be barely noticeable.

Everyday I wake up and hate myself. I wonder why God made me the way I am. So many people around the world are living in constant suffering and pain only they can understand.

So many people(like me) have brains that are wired in a way to make others around you hate you for just existing and being in there presence.

I think I've got your back, freind. :3

I starting to lose all the faith i've had in God because of this.

Well don't, there are many reasons to believe in Him.

Computers run on code. Code is written by man. The universe and things in it run on laws of physics, whch were written by God. The universe is amazing and made by God.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

other high profile names

If true, This is bad. All of them shoulf be released.

▲ 1 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

bloomberg

LAWL trusting Lefty Fake News, i see. Where is the actual eviidence for this? "trust bloomberg bro"?? Hahahahaha!

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

more utility

More utility to the anti-Christ enslavement technotyranny system, yes. Not to the commoner.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›