1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I found an interesting paper that explains the phenomenon: https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~amyers/MoonPaperOnline.pdf

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +2 / -1

God has conspired to keep billions of his children ignorant of the facts of our reality. By revealing these things perhaps you are working against his plan.

3
Geek-the-Mage 3 points ago +6 / -3

Not only do you think the earth is flat, you are also unable to think in three dimensions at all.

This image makes perfect sense in the heliocentric model.

0
Geek-the-Mage 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sounds like a conspiracy.

by pkvi
2
Geek-the-Mage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, Vermont is a lot bigger than it used to be.

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

You got all those degrees and still didn't learn how to do math? Sounds like you wasted your money and time.

Here, I'll give you the equation for centrifugal force and what the variables are and you can tell me how much centrifugal force the "spinning ball" earth has on you.

F = (m*v²)/r.

Force (F) - how much force the the earth's spin pushes you away from it.
mass (m) - mass of the object, your body, for instance, 180 pounds.
tangential velocity (v) - linear velocity of the surface, you gave 1000 mph.
radius (r) - radius of the earth, approx. 4000 miles.

I'll wait, Master's Degree.

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

The container was an example I used to show that water is affected by acceleration. You keep getting stuck on the direction of the acceleration. What if a stationary ball with very high mass had an acceleration pointing toward its center? Would the water stick to it then?

The centrifugal force of the earth is negligible because it's angular speed is very small. It revolves only once every 24 hours. You have confused linear speed with rotational speed. Try spinning a ball 1 revolution per day and see how much centrifugal force it has.

As for winds, that's another easy explanation if you think about it. The atmosphere is rotating with the land due to friction. Air behaves like a very thin fluid. Try putting water in a bucket and then spinning the bucket on its vertical axis... after a little while the water will be spinning with the bucket.

You keep telling telling me to do the math, but something tells me YOU haven't done the math.

3
Geek-the-Mage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why does capitalism require constant growth?

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to pile on, but this reasoning is weak.

0
Geek-the-Mage 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have been lied to but not by the physics professors. It's not your fault for going down the wrong rabbit hole. Not everything is a conspiracy. There are precious few facts we can rely on these days, but modern physics is still reliable. It's unfortunate that you're living in the world you're living in, but I understand.

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with what you said about Blackrock, but the globos don't want high interest rates. What we're seeing is the FED finally breaking ranks with European elites and fighting for its own survival. No doubt the FED will trigger a depression with these rate hikes but it might just save the Dollar.

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

It sounds like you're just afraid to trust yourself. I explained gravity is just an acceleration force, it's not magic. Earth's gravity has been measured at 9.8 m/s². You can feel the earth pushing back on your body, preventing you from traveling downward.

2
Geek-the-Mage 2 points ago +2 / -0

If water can stick to a bucket bottom under acceleration why can't it stick to a globe under acceleration? Obviously the direction of acceleration is not the same in these two cases, but in the case of the earth the centrifugal force is negligible and is far outweighed by the acceleration due to gravity.

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the water stays in the bucket then you must admit that water doesn't always find its level downward. You must also admit that water can be acted on by forces other than pressure, as you conveniently forgot to mention in your post. In this example the water finds its level in the direction of acceleration (the bottom of the bucket).

If water can be acted on by acceleration is it such a leap to accept that all the water on earth that is apparently level, is being accelerated downward by some force?

If you visualize a sphere with the direction of acceleration toward its center, instead of outward like the bucket, you can visualize a how water could bend around a sphere.

If you can't complete this simple thought experiment you may be too afraid to trust yourself.

3
Geek-the-Mage 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you put some water in a bucket and quickly swing it around in a circle does the water find it's level and spill out or does it stay in the bucket?

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Believe it or not the reason they're so desperate to spend is because our rising interest rate is crushing the Euro. If Congress can force the FED to create more dollars they can halt the rising interest rate, or even lower it. However, this time, the FED will not capitulate like they always have in the past. It's a power struggle and the US bankers are going to win.

I do not expect any more big spending bills to pass and I expect interest rates to continue rising.

by pkvi
2
Geek-the-Mage 2 points ago +2 / -0

That kind of makes sense to me, if they don't have infrastructure they need some kind of robust system people can trust. Not necessarily a China-style CBDC, but maybe an open source crypto system that has governance baked in. At least it wouldn't be warlords running everything. It could be a big step up from what they have in poor countries.

by pkvi
2
Geek-the-Mage 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not going to happen like you think. Instead of a coordinated worldwide collapse, it's going to happen in waves. What we're facing is a possible crash of the Euro and capital flight into the US in September. That's what the European technocrats (i.e. WEF) want to prevent, hence the PayPal policy you see. Look for signs of Italy exiting the EU... if that happens the whole EU is going to fall.

If it happens things could get bad here as the European old money powers take some drastic measures. (most likely try to get us involved in a greater war with Russia). We need to avoid war at any costs.

As European capital floods into the US, everything will go up in price including stocks (it's already happening, look at the DOW!), but this will be short-lived because then we're in for a big crash.

Sure, WEF would love to get the world on CBDCs, but we're not even within 5 years of that technology in the US. China is close to implementing it.

by xihg
1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, kind of hard to fake a financial collapse. The global financial world is too interconnected.

by pkvi
3
Geek-the-Mage 3 points ago +3 / -0

He should send them to Washington DC since that is where thr problem is.

2
Geek-the-Mage 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a big rise, but it's still not a huge number of deaths. Confronted with this information the left will still cling to the narrative that it was all worth it.

1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

The explanation that he had someone controlling the circuit was pretty convincing to me. The TV show hosts are trying to make entertainment and the circus side-show actor is likely being paid. If you want to believe the entertainers over a real electrical engineer then I won't try to ruin your fun any more.

by xihg
1
Geek-the-Mage 1 point ago +1 / -0

The mainstream opinion is he's a traitor. You had congressmen openly calling for his death. I don't get how you're trying to infer that he was a psyop by stating your distrust for the mainstream opinion.

Let's not forget that what he did was relevatory at the time, even though people on this very thread say it was always known. Some people may have suspected what the NSA was up to, but having the evidence out in the open was eye-opening to many, many more.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›