Could you use words to communicate instead of pictures?

I don't believe in the secret chemical dispersal through commercial airplanes. I do believe there are geo-engineering attempts going on, though. It even pops up in the mainstream news sometimes as a possible counter to "global warming."

Chemtrails. Used to believe the conspiracy, now I don't.

That's pretty neat you came up with a hack for it. Are there any sites that use paywalls that are worth reading these days?

This is funny. Is there any context?

I have all emergency notifications turned off on my company phone. I guess we will see.

Which is exactly why the Scientologists want to keep the use of his hair a secret!

That is a lot more cameras than I expected! The Blade Runners sure have their work cut out for them!

I remember when the brits used to light speed cameras on fire with gasoline and used tires. I wonder if that campaign against speed cameras succeeded. In any case, bravo to these criminals for doing the right thing.

LOL. I'm certain it was a joke based on his handle.

When will it get so bad that Musk goes "Gault" and simply checks out of the system?

Sorry the guy in the tiktok was too long winded to tolerate, talking about his personal situation. What is this conspiracy about?

Since general relativity has run dry, it is perhaps time to start looking for a paradigm shift outside of the universe as we currently understand it. We should be employing every theoretical physicist to discover a unified theory.

You take away the computers and everything around you could have been made in the 1970s.

Eric Weinstein has been beating this drum for a while... That we are in a great stagnation for the past 50 years in physics. He goes into all the problems with academia and why our smartest people are wasting their efforts on string theory instead of doing real physics.

I also skipped the last 3 years due to the mandates, when my kind clearly was unwelcome. I'm hoping this year is a return to greatness.

I'll be at GenCon next week if anyone wants to hang out and play some games.

Your post proves you don't understand outgassing as well as you think you do. Just like always, you latch on to one scientific fact and ignore the rest of the variables involved. It leads to a flawed understanding of the mechanics at work and false conclusions.

If you want to learn more, I found Henry Frankel's paper on outgassing a fascinating read.

You mean the modular space station... that was assembled on earth and each piece was hauled to space on board rockets, then locked together one piece at a time over a period of 10 years? What kind of video evidence of that sequence of events would you accept as proof?

The y-axis is labeled "Number of Publications" so I have to assume it's showing the number of papers written on each malady over the years, though I'm not sure how the number sometimes goes down. You'd expect the numbers to steadily rise over time, depending on funding/interest.

It's pointless to discuss it with you because when you're proven wrong on a point you vanish.

I like this idea... live in the wilderness of Alaska like Dick Proenneke. Get jobs on the fishing boats when needed. They turn the screws on citizens in trade for comfort and convenience. The only way out of the system is to live rough like the old days. Maybe there is a compromise where you live within the system, but you're not part of it, like a ghost in the machine.

I would say I have a basic understanding of outgassing, but that would be more of a problem if your concern is trying to create or maintain a high vacuum. It's not a problem if you just need to maintain pressure. Pressure and vacuum are not the inverse of each other. Vacuum is merely the absence of pressure.

I'm not an engineer, so let me give you an example (with fake numbers) to illustrate my point. Keep in mind that the real numbers are likely staggeringly small.

Let's say a 10^-6 Torr vacuum has 5000 air molecules floating around in it and you need to extract 4995 of them to get down to 10^-12 Torr. Even a small leak will ruin your progress toward achieving a higher vacuum because we're talking about a tiny amounts of matter here.

On the other hand, if you want to maintain a breathable volume of air pressure, a few molecules escaping through your craft's seals won't be missed. You don't have to maintain the vacuum of space, you just have to bring enough air with you to replace any that escapes.

What side is vacuum only matters structurally. The seals on hatches, space gloves, windows, any joint between materials, they all need to handle 10^-12 torr vacuum.

I disagree. The reason the seals matter in a vacuum chamber is because you have to create the vacuum, which is very hard to do. If the vacuum already exists (in some area of space) all you have to do is seal against 1 atm of pressure escaping. You seem to be under the impression that high vacuum is somehow the inverse of high pressure. It's not. It's just absence of pressure, so you only need to seal against the amount of pressure your vessel needs to hold.

It should be obvious that a suit or craft that can maintain 1 atm pressure in a 10^-6 Torr vacuum can also maintain 1 atm pressure in 10^-12 Torr vacuum. There is no practical difference at that level when your goal is to maintain pressure.

All these arguments sound persuasive at first, until you think them through. The people who promote this stuff do it mostly in bad faith to sucker people with moderate-to-low intelligence. The lure of "hidden knowledge" is the same thing many religions and cults sucker people with. Don't fall for this crap.

A vacuum chamber is designed to keep all pressure out while a space suit/capsule/habitat is designed to keep pressure in. Creating strong vacuum is a fundamentally different task from maintaining 1 atmosphere of pressure. You essentially have to evacuate all the molecules bouncing around in the chamber, which gets exponentially harder to do the fewer of them left.

To equate the two like you do in this disinfographic is just dumb.